NOTICE OF ~~2016~~2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JUNE ~~15, 2016~~

14, 2022

Notice is hereby given that the ~~2016 annual meeting~~2022 Annual Meeting of ~~shareholders~~Shareholders of Oxford Industries, Inc. will be held on ~~Wednesday,~~Tuesday, June ~~15, 2016~~14, 2022 at 3:2:00 p.m., ~~local time, at The Fifth Floor Conference Center at 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. The purposes of~~Eastern Time. This year’s annual meeting will once again be conducted as a virtual meeting via live audio webcast. There will not be a physical location for the annual meeting, and shareholders will not be able to attend the meeting ~~are to:~~

in person. Shareholders may access and participate in the annual meeting by visiting www.meetnow.global/MSPW2TH. At the meeting, shareholders will consider and vote on the following matters:

(1)

~~Elect four~~

To elect as directors ~~nominated by our Board and~~three Class III nominees, as named in the accompanying proxy statement, to serve until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

(2)

To approve the Oxford Industries, Inc. Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, to, among other things, authorize 500,000 additional shares of common stock for ~~a term of three years and until their respective successors are elected and qualified;~~issuance under the plan;

(3)

~~(2)~~

~~Approve~~

To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal ~~2016;~~2022;

(4)

~~(3)~~

~~Hold an~~

To approve, by a non-binding, advisory ~~non-binding~~ vote, ~~to approve~~the compensation of our named executive ~~compensation;~~officers; and

(5)

~~(4)~~

~~Transact~~

To transact any other business that properly comes before the annual meeting or any adjournment or ~~postponement of the annual meeting.~~

postponement.

Shareholders of record as of the close of business on April ~~15, 2016~~14, 2022 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting.

~~Pursuant~~We have designed the format of the annual meeting to ~~U.S. Securities~~ensure that shareholders have the opportunity to participate in the meeting. The annual meeting will include a live Q&A session during which members of our executive leadership team, including the Chairman of the Board, will be available to answer questions submitted during the meeting, as time permits. To ensure the annual meeting is conducted in a manner that is fair to all shareholders, the Chairman (or such other person designated by our Board) may exercise discretion in recognizing questions, the order in which questions are answered and ~~Exchange Commission rules, we~~the amount of time devoted to questions.

We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials ~~over~~on the Internet ~~instead of mailing printed copies to our shareholders.~~under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. A Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ~~is being~~will be mailed to shareholders beginning on or about May ~~6, 2016.~~4, 2022. This ~~2016~~ proxy statement and our ~~2015~~2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K may be accessed by all shareholders athttp://www.edocumentview.com/~~OXM~~.oxford. Any shareholder may request a printed copy of the proxy materials by following the instructions set forth in the Notice of Internet Availability.

A list of our shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for examination by any shareholder, or his or her agent or attorney, at the annual meeting. The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of our Board. Reference is made to the accompanying proxy statement for further information with respect to the items of business to be transacted at the annual meeting.

Your vote is ~~important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the annual meeting,~~important, and you are encouraged to vote as soon as possible. You may vote ~~over~~using any of the ~~Internet, or~~following methods: (1) on the Internet; (2) by ~~signing and returning a proxy card or voting by telephone after~~ requesting a paper copy of the proxy materials ~~following~~and submitting your vote via a toll-free telephone number or by signing, dating and mailing a completed proxy card; or (3) electronically during the ~~instructions set forth in the Notice of Internet Availability.~~annual meeting. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described onin the Notice of Internet Availability. ~~You may revoke your proxy at any time before the annual meeting and, if you attend the annual meeting, you may elect to vote in person.~~ If your shares are held in an account atwith a ~~bank or~~ broker, your ~~bank or~~ broker will vote your shares for you if you provide voting instructions. In the absence of instructions, your broker can only vote your shares on limited matters.

~~Attendance at~~

The live audio webcast of the annual meeting ~~is limited~~will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time. We encourage shareholders to ~~shareholders, those holding proxies from shareholders, and invited guests such as members~~access the webcast in advance of the ~~media. If your shares are held~~designated start time. Please see “Information About the Meeting and Voting” in ~~an account at a bank or broker, you should bring~~ the ~~notice or voting instruction form you received from your bank or broker, or obtain a valid~~accompanying proxy ~~card from your bank or broker,~~statement for additional information about how to participate in ~~order to gain admission to~~ the annual meeting.


May ~~6, 2016~~4, 2022			By Order of the Board of Directors, Suraj A. Palakshappa Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer and Secretary


	Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on June 14, 2022: This proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available on the Internet at http://www.edocumentview.com/oxford.	~~Thomas E. Campbell~~ ~~Executive Vice President—Law and Administration,~~ ~~General Counsel and Secretary~~

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on June 15, 2016: This proxy statement and our fiscal 2015 annual report to shareholders are available on the Internet at http://www.edocumentview.com/OXM.

~~Table of Contents~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	PROXY STATEMENT			1
~~PROXY STATEMENT~~	INTRODUCTION			1
~~INTRODUCTION~~	PROPOSALS FOR SHAREHOLDER CONSIDERATION			1
~~INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING~~	Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors			12
~~Shares Outstanding~~	Board of Directors			12
~~Voting~~	Bylaws Relating to Retirement			12
~~Broker Discretionary Voting; Broker Non-Votes~~	Director Nominations			2
~~Changing Your Vote~~	Required Vote			2
~~Quorum~~	Recommendation of our Board of Directors			23
	Proposal No. 2: Approval of Oxford Industries, Inc. Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated			3
	General			3
	Amendments to the LTIP			3
	History of the LTIP			3
	Shares Available for Issuance under the LTIP			4
	Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans			4
	Award Limits			4
	Administration and Eligibility			4
	Share Usage and Dilution			4
	Types of Awards			6
	Performance-Based Compensation			7
	Adjustments			8
	Transferability			8
	Amendment			8
	Duration			8
	United States Federal Income Tax Consequences			8
	Section 409A			9
	New Plan Benfits			10
	Why We Believe Shareholders Should Vote in Favor of the LTIP, as Amended and Restated			10
	Copies of the LTIP			10
	Required Vote			10
	Recommendation of our Board of Directors			11
	Proposal No. 3: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			11
	Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			11
	Required Vote			11
	Recommendation of our Board of Directors			11
	Proposal No. 4: Non-Binding, Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation			11
	Executive Compensation			11
	Proposed Resolution			11
	Required Vote			11
	Recommendation of our Board of Directors			12
	CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS			313
~~Directors~~	Directors			313
	Director ~~Independence~~ Nominees			613
	Continuing Directors			15
	Director Skills and Qualifications			17
	Director Independence			17
	Corporate Governance Guidelines; Conduct Policies			717
	Board Meetings and Committees of our Board of Directors			717
	Executive Committee			18
	Audit Committee			18
	Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee (or NC&G Committee)			18
	Environmental, Social and Governance Oversight			19
	Meetings of Non-Employee Directors			919
	Board Leadership			919
~~Board's Role in Risk Oversight~~		10
~~Website Information~~		10
Director Nomination Process			1020
~~Director Compensation~~	Board Diversity			1020
~~EXECUTIVE OFFICERS~~	Director Compensation			1320

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Compensation Program for Fiscal 2021	20
~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~	Director Compensation for Fiscal 2021	1421
~~Introduction~~	Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines	1422
	EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	23
	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	25
	Introduction	25
	Compensation Discussion and Analysis	1425
~~Compensation Tables~~	Executive Summary	2625
	Fiscal 2021 Overview and Highlights	25
	Consideration of Last Year’s Advisory Say-On-Pay Votes	26
	Compensation Philosophy and Objectives	26
	Compensation Decision Process	27
	Elements of Executive Officer Compensation	28
	Base Salary	30
	Short-Term Incentive Compensation	30
	Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation	32
	Other Benefit Plans and Perquisites	34
	Written Arrangements	35
	Clawback Policy	35
	Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines; Anti-Pledging/Hedging Policy	35
	Compensation Tables	36
	Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2021	36
	Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021	37
	Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2021 Year-End	38
	Stock Vested During Fiscal 2021	39
	Fiscal 2021 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation	40
	Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control	2940
	CEO Pay Ratio	41
	NOMINATING, COMPENSATION & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT	3043
	COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION	3043
	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	3043
	AUDIT-RELATED MATTERS	3143
	Report of the Audit Committee	3143
	Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	3244
	~~Audit Committee Pre-Approval~~Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors	3244
	COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP BY MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS	3345
~~Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance~~	Management	3545
	Certain Beneficial Owners	45
	Delinquent Section 16A Reports	46
	EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION	3547
~~PROPOSALS FOR SHAREHOLDER CONSIDERATION~~	INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING	3547
~~Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors~~	Shares Outstanding	3547
~~Proposal No. 2: Approval of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~	Participating in the Meeting	3747
~~Proposal No. 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation~~	Voting	3747
~~Other Matters~~	Broker Discretionary Voting; Broker Non-Votes	3848
~~ADDITIONAL INFORMATION~~	Changing Your Vote	3848
	Quorum	48
	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	49
	Annual Report on Form 10-K	3849
	Board’s Role in Risk Oversight	49
	Submission of Director Candidates by Shareholders	3849
	Shareholder Proposals	3950
	Communications to our Board of Directors	3950
	Proxy Solicitation	4050
	Shareholder List	50
	Website Information	51
	APPENDIX A–OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN	A-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Table of Contents~~

999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688
Atlanta, Georgia 30309

PROXY STATEMENT

For ~~2016~~2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders ~~Meeting~~
To Be Held on June ~~15, 2016~~14, 2022

Introduction

~~INTRODUCTION~~

This proxy statement contains information relating to the ~~2016 annual meeting~~2022 Annual Meeting of ~~shareholders~~Shareholders of Oxford Industries, Inc. to be held on ~~Wednesday,~~Tuesday, June ~~15, 2016,~~14, 2022, beginning at 3:2:00 p.m., ~~local time.~~Eastern Time. The annual meeting will be ~~held~~conducted as a virtual meeting, accessible via live audio webcast at The Fifth Floor Conference Center at 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. You may contact our Investor Relations Department at (404) 659-2424 to obtain directions to the site of the annual meeting.

~~Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we~~www.meetnow.global/MSPW2TH.

We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials ~~over~~on the Internet. Accordingly, we are mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our shareholders instead of a paper copy of our proxy materials. By providing our proxy materials on the Internet, we believe that we are increasing our shareholders’ ability to access the information they need while at the same time reducing the cost and environmental impact of our annual meeting. The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions for accessing our proxy materials and submitting a proxy ~~over~~on the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability also contains instructions for requesting a paper copy of our proxy materials. We will begin mailing the Notice of Internet Availability on or about May ~~6, 2016,~~4, 2022 to all holders of our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, entitled to vote at the annual meeting. A similar notice will be sent by brokers ~~banks~~ and other nominees to beneficial owners of shares of which they are the shareholder of record.

This ~~2016~~ proxy statement and ~~2015~~our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available athttp://www.edocumentview.com/~~OXM~~~~. This site does not have "cookies" that identify visitors to the site.~~oxford. We will mail any shareholder a copy of the proxy materials free of charge upon request, but you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. You may request to receive a copy of proxy materials by ~~mail by~~ following the instructions set forth in the Notice of Internet Availability.

PROPOSALS FOR SHAREHOLDER CONSIDERATION

Proposal		Board’s Recommendation
Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors	Election of Ms. Helen Ballard, Ms. Virginia A. Hepner and Mr. Milford W. McGuirt as Class III directors for a three-year term expiring in 2025	FOR EACH
Proposal No. 2—Approval of Oxford Industries, Inc. Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated	Approve the Oxford Industries, Inc. Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, to, among other things, authorize 500,000 additional shares of common stock for issuance under the plan	FOR
Proposal No. 3—Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP	Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022	FOR
Proposal No. 4—Non-Binding, Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation	A non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers	FOR

TABLE OF CONTENTS
~~INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING~~

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

Board of Directors

~~Shares Outstanding~~

~~You may vote at~~In accordance with our ~~2016 annual shareholders meeting if you owned shares of~~charter, our ~~common stock~~directors are divided into three classes that are as ~~of the close of business on April 15, 2016, the record date for the annual meeting. As of the record date, there were 16,755,551 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. You~~nearly equal in size as possible. Directors in each class are ~~entitled~~elected to ~~one vote for each share of our common stock that you owned on the record date.~~

~~Voting~~

~~If, on April 15, 2016, your shares of Oxford common stock were registered directly in your name~~three-year terms, with ~~Computershare, our transfer agent, then you are a shareholder of record. As a shareholder of record, you may vote using one of the following methods:~~

•: ~~by voting over the Internet by following the instructions set forth in the Notice of Internet Availability;~~
•: ~~by signing and returning a proxy or voting by telephone after requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials; or~~
•: ~~by attending~~director classes serving staggered terms. A director holds office until the annual meeting ~~and voting in person.~~

~~If you are a shareholder~~ of ~~record and you sign and return your proxy card but do not include voting instructions, your proxy will be voted as recommended by our Board or, if no recommendation is given,~~shareholders held in the ~~discretion of~~year during which the ~~proxies designated on the proxy card, to the extent permitted under applicable law.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~If you are a shareholder of record, your shares will not be voted unless you submit a proxy (either over the Internet~~director’s term ends and until his or ~~by signing~~her successor is elected and returning a proxy card) or attend the annual meeting and vote in person. If you vote over the Internet, please have your Notice of Internet Availability available at the time you submit your voting instructions. The Internet voting procedures provided on the Notice of Internet Availability are designed to authenticate shareholders' identities and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.

If, on April 15, 2016, your shares were held in an account at a bank or broker, like most of our shareholders, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name" and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. The bank or broker holding your account is considered the shareholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank or broker on how to vote the shares in your account. Telephone and/or Internet voting may be available to direct your bank or broker on how to vote the shares in your account but the availability of telephone and/or Internet voting will depend on the voting processes of your bank or broker. Please follow the directions on your proxy card or voting instruction form carefully. Even if your shares are held in an account at a bank or broker, you are invited to attend the annual meeting. However, since you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a valid proxy card from your bank or broker and, in order to gain admission to the meeting, you should bring the notice or voting instruction form you received from your bank or broker, or obtain a valid proxy card from your bank or broker.

~~Broker Discretionary Voting; Broker Non-Votes~~

If you hold shares through an account with a bank or broker, your shares may be voted by the bank or broker even if you do not provide voting instructions. Banks and brokerage firms have the authority, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"), to vote shares in their discretion on certain "routine" matters when their clients do not provide voting instructions. Under the NYSE's rules, as currently in effect, only Proposal No. 2 (approval of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016) is considered a routine matter.

~~The other proposals to be addressed at the annual meeting are considered "non-routine" matters under the NYSE's rules.~~qualified. When a bank or brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from the beneficial holder of the shares with respect to a non-routine matter, the bank or brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that proposal. This is called a "broker non-vote." Broker non-votes will be counted as present at the annual meeting for quorum purposes but will not be counted as entitled to vote on the non-routine matter.~~Therefore, if your shares are held in an account at a bank or broker, it is important that you provide voting instructions to your bank or broker so that your vote on these proposals is counted.~~

~~Changing Your Vote~~

~~If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke or change your vote with respect to the shares of our common stock that are registered directly in your name by doing any of the following:~~

•: ~~delivering a written notice of revocation to our Secretary before the vote is taken at the annual meeting, such notice of revocation dated later than the proxy you want to revoke;~~
•: ~~prior to the applicable cutoff time, changing your vote using the Internet methods for voting described above;~~
•: ~~properly executing and delivering a later-dated proxy before the vote is taken at the annual meeting;~~
•: ~~if you have requested a printed copy of the proxy materials, by voting by telephone; or~~
•: ~~voting in person at the annual meeting (your attendance at the annual meeting, in and of itself, will not revoke the earlier proxy).~~

If your shares are held in an account at a bank or broker, then you must follow the instructions provided by your bank or broker in order to revoke or change your vote with respect to those shares held in street name.

~~Quorum~~

In order for us to conduct the annual meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of the record date must be present, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting. This is referred to as a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be counted as shares present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS~~

~~Directors~~

~~Under our articles of incorporation, our Board is to consist of at least nine members, with the specific number fixed by our bylaws, as amended from time to time. Currently, our bylaws have fixed~~ the number of directors is increased, newly appointed directors are required to stand for election at ~~10.~~

~~There are~~the next annual meeting.

Bylaws Relating to Retirement

Pursuant to our bylaws, an individual becomes ineligible for election or appointment as a director: (1) for any employee director (i.e., someone who concurrently serves as an employee of our company and as a member of our Board), other than an individual who has at any time served as our Chief Executive Officer, following the end of our fiscal year during which such individual reaches the age of 65; and (2) for any other individual, following the end of our fiscal year during which such individual reaches the age of 72.

Director Nominations

Our Board currently ~~ten members serving~~consists of three Class I directors (Messrs. Dennis M. Love, Clyde C. Tuggle and E. Jenner Wood III), four Class II directors (Messrs. Thomas C. Chubb III, John R. Holder, Stephen S. Lanier and Clarence H. Smith) and four Class III directors (Ms. Helen Ballard, Ms. Virginia A. Hepner, Mr. Thomas C. Gallagher and Mr. Milford W. McGuirt).

At our 2022 annual meeting, the terms of our Class III directors will expire. Our Board, on the recommendation of our ~~Board.~~ Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee, or NC&G Committee, has unanimously nominated Ms. Helen Ballard, Ms. Virginia A. Hepner and Mr. Milford W. McGuirt for election at our annual meeting as Class III directors, each to serve for a three year term expiring in 2025 and until his or her respective successor is elected and qualified.

The term for Mr. ~~George~~Thomas C. ~~Guynn, who~~Gallagher also expires at the end of the meeting. Mr. Gallagher has served on our Board since ~~2007 and currently serves~~2013, having previously served as ~~chair~~a member of our ~~Audit Committee, expires at the annual meeting.~~Board from 1991 until 2007. Because Mr. ~~Guynn~~Gallagher reached the retirement age of 72 prior to the beginning of our current fiscal year, he is no longer eligible for election as a director under our ~~Bylaws.~~bylaws. Therefore, Mr. ~~Guynn~~Gallagher will ~~retire~~not seek re-election as a director ~~as of~~at the annual meeting. We thank Mr. ~~Guynn~~Gallagher for his many years of service to our company.

Following Mr. Gallagher’s retirement, there will be a vacancy on our Board. Our Board may choose to (1) immediately fill the vacancy, (2) allow the vacancy to remain open until a suitable candidate is identified and elected or (3) amend our bylaws to reduce the number of directors serving on our Board.

The terms of our Class I directors expire in 2023, and the terms of our Class II directors expire in 2024. Each of our Class I and Class II directors is currently expected to remain in office for the remainder of his or her current term.

Required Vote

In an uncontested election at an annual meeting of shareholders, our bylaws require that each director be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director (number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director). In accordance with our bylaws, in order for a shareholder to have nominated a director for consideration at the 2022 annual meeting, we must have received the nomination not later than the close of business on March 17, 2022. We have not received a shareholder nomination for a director for consideration at the 2022 annual meeting. Accordingly, the election of directors at the 2022 annual meeting is an uncontested election.

Under Georgia law, in an uncontested election, if a nominee who is already serving as a director is not elected, the director would continue to serve on our Board as a “holdover director.” Under our bylaws, any holdover director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast must offer to tender his or her resignation to our Board. Our Board, in consultation with any of its committees so designated, would then determine whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. Under our bylaws, our Board is required to act on the resignation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote for the election of directors. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

Each nominee has consented to serve if elected, and our Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unwilling or unable to serve prior to the annual meeting, then at the recommendation of our Board: (1) proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee selected by or at the direction of our Board; (2) the vacancy created by the inability or unwillingness of a nominee to serve will remain open until filled by our Board; or (3) our bylaws may be amended to reduce the number of directors serving on our Board.

2 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF MS. HELEN BALLARD, MS. VIRGINIA A. HEPNER AND MR. MILFORD W. MCGUIRT AS A CLASS III DIRECTOR.

Proposal No. 2: Approval of Oxford Industries, Inc. Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated

General

We are asking shareholders to approve the Oxford Industries, Inc. Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (which we refer to as the “LTIP”). The purpose of the LTIP is to promote our long-term financial success and increase shareholder value by providing equity-based compensation opportunities for our key employees and non-employee directors. We believe that equity-based awards are a competitive necessity in our industry and are essential to our continued ability to recruit and retain the caliber of individuals needed to successfully oversee and execute our strategy.

The LTIP serves these objectives and our shareholders’ interests by making equity-based awards available for grant to eligible participants in the form of (i) stock options, (ii) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), (iii) restricted shares of our common stock, (iv) restricted share units (“RSUs”) or (v) other stock-based awards, in each case, together with related rights and interests therein.

Recognizing that, generally, to deliver a given long-term incentive award value, stock options require more shares than full-value awards and to further ensure that LTIP participants share in the appreciation and depreciation of the value of our common stock in line with the interests of our shareholders, since 2004, we have exclusively utilized service-based and performance-based, full-value awards (i.e., restricted shares and RSUs) for equity-based compensation and would currently expect that approach to continue.

Amendments to the LTIP

On March 21, 2022, our Board voted to amend and restate the LTIP, subject to shareholder approval at this year’s annual meeting, to, (i) increase by 500,000 the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the LTIP, (ii) remove and delete certain references to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (which we refer to as the “Code”) rendered inapplicable by The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, (iii) add provisions for the potential grant of “other stock-based awards” pursuant to the LTIP and (iv) make certain other non-material amendments.

Certain of the proposed changes to the LTIP do not require shareholder approval. Accordingly, if shareholders do not approve Proposal No. 2, these amendments to the LTIP approved by our Board will become effective; however, the increase in the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the LTIP will not.

History of the LTIP

Certain milestones of the LTIP are as follows:

•

The LTIP was originally adopted by our Board on July 27, 2004, subject to approval of our shareholders.

•

The LTIP became effective upon approval by our shareholders on October 4, 2004.

•

The LTIP was amended by our Board on August 3, 2006, subject to shareholder approval, to, among other things, increase by 500,000 shares a sublimit on the number of shares of our common stock that could be issued under the LTIP free of a “substantial risk of forfeiture” or in satisfaction of RSUs awarded under the LTIP.

•

The LTIP was again amended by our Board on September 26, 2006, prior to our 2006 annual meeting, to eliminate various successor stock option plans and provide for the LTIP to serve as our company’s sole equity-based compensation plan (with the exception of our employee stock purchase plan, which is available to our eligible part-time and full-time employees in the United States on a non-discriminatory basis).

•

Our Board’s August 3, 2006 amendment to the LTIP was approved by our shareholders on October 10, 2006.

•

The LTIP was amended by our Board on March 26, 2009, subject to shareholder approval, to (1) increase by 1,000,000 shares the number of shares of our common stock that can be granted to participants over the life of the LTIP and (2) remove all sublimits on the number of shares of our common stock that could be issued under the LTIP free of a “substantial risk of forfeiture” or in satisfaction of RSUs awarded under the LTIP.

•

Our Board’s March 26, 2009 amendments to the LTIP were approved by our shareholders on June 15, 2009.

•

Our Board approved certain non-material amendments to the LTIP on March 27, 2014.

•

Our shareholders reapproved the LTIP on June 18, 2014 to preserve the tax deductibility of qualifying performance-based awards pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

The LTIP was amended by our Board on March 24, 2015 to, among other things, (1) establish minimum vesting periods for certain awards under the plan and (2) eliminate liberal share recycling provisions previously included in the plan.

Notably and as reflected above, (i) the LTIP remains our company’s sole equity-based compensation plan and (ii) we have not increased the number of shares available for issuance under the LTIP since 2009.

Shares Available for Issuance under the LTIP

Subject to shareholder approval of this proposal, the total number of shares authorized for issuance over the life of the LTIP is 2,500,000 shares. Assuming the effectiveness of the proposed amendment, as of April 14, 2022, there would have been an aggregate of 684,108 shares of our common stock available for issuance under the LTIP (assuming the vesting of all then outstanding unvested restricted shares and service-based RSUs, as well as the grant at target performance of all shares of our common stock that could be granted pursuant to outstanding performance-based RSU awards). As of April 29, 2022, the closing price of our common stock was $89.60 per share.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Certain additional information concerning securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of January 29, 2022, consisting of the LTIP and our employee stock purchase plan, is presented in the “Equity Compensation Plan Information” section of this proxy statement.

Award Limits

Under the LTIP, an individual may not receive awards representing more than 300,000 shares of our common stock in any one calendar year. In addition, the aggregate number of shares issued under the LTIP upon the exercise of incentive stock options may not exceed 200,000.

Administration and Eligibility

Our NC&G Committee (or another committee appointed by our Board) administers the LTIP. Pursuant to ~~nominating Ms.~~its charter, our NC&G Committee is to be comprised of at least three directors, each of whom must be independent under the applicable NYSE listing standards and a “non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In its capacity as plan administrator, our NC&G Committee determines which participants are granted awards, the type of each award granted and the terms and conditions of each award. Our NC&G Committee also has full power and authority to interpret and construe the LTIP and any associated award agreements. Any action or determination by our NC&G Committee is final, binding and conclusive.

With respect to each award granted under the LTIP, we have entered into and will continue to enter into a written or electronic award agreement with the participant which describes the terms and conditions of the award, including: (i) the type of award and when and how it may be exercised or earned; (ii) any exercise price associated with the award; (iii) how the award will or may be settled; and (iv) any other applicable terms and conditions affecting the award.

Employees of our company and our subsidiaries and non-employee members of our Board may be selected by our NC&G Committee to receive benefits under the LTIP. As of April 14, 2022, approximately 4,800 employees and 10 non-employee directors were eligible to participate in the LTIP.

Share Usage and Dilution

Assuming the effectiveness of the proposed amendment to the LTIP to add an additional 500,000 shares available for future issuance, as of April 14, 2022, there would have been an aggregate of 684,108 shares of our common stock available for issuance under the LTIP (assuming the vesting of all then outstanding unvested restricted shares and service-based RSUs, as well as the issuance at target performance of all shares of our common stock that could be issued pursuant to outstanding performance-based RSU awards).

4 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Dilution (aka Overhang)

The following table illustrates the potential dilutive impact to our shareholders of the LTIP, after giving effect to the proposed amendments, which we believe is below or within industry benchmarks:

	Currently Outstanding Awards (as of April 14, 2022)					418,314(1)
	Available for Future Awards (assumes LTIP approved)					684,108
	Total					1,102,422
	Shares Outstanding as of April 14, 2022 Record Date					16,345,358
	Dilution					6.7%

(1)

The number of shares subject to currently outstanding awards assumes the issuance at target performance of all shares of our common stock that could be issued pursuant to outstanding performance-based RSU awards. If our actual performance results in awards above or below target performance, those results would impact the number listed in the table as available for future awards on a one-for-one basis and have no impact on the dilution calculation or the dilutive impact of the LTIP.

Burn Rate

The following tables provide information regarding our NC&G Committee’s usage of the LTIP in the last three fiscal years (i.e., burn rate) based on both (i) performance-based awards at the time of approval (assuming target performance) and (ii) the actual number of shares earned based on actual performance under performance-based awards following the conclusion of the applicable performance period:

Burn Rate Based on Approved Performance-Based Awards (Assuming Target Performance for Performance-Based Awards)
	Director Retainers (Restricted Shares)		Service-Based Restricted Shares		Performance- Based Restricted Shares(1)		Performance- Based RSU Awards(2)		Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding (000s)(3)		Burn Rate(4)		Burn Rate (ISS Methodology)(4)(5)
Fiscal 2019		10,254		42,573		43,532		—		16,756		0.58%		0.86%
Fiscal 2020		18,305		131,425		—		83,345		16,576		1.41%		2.11%
Fiscal 2021		11,148		42,855		—		56,750		16,631		0.67%		1.00%
Three-Year Average												0.88%		1.33%

(1)

“Performance-Based Restricted Shares” reflects the number of shares that would be earned pursuant to performance-based equity awards approved during the relevant fiscal year (at target performance based on our earnings per share during a one-year performance period).

(2)

“Performance-Based RSU Awards” reflects the number of shares that would be issued pursuant to performance-based equity awards approved during the relevant fiscal year (at target performance based on our relative total shareholder return during the applicable three-year performance period).

(3)

Reflects basic weighted average number of shares outstanding during the applicable period.

(4)

Burn rate = number of shares awarded (as set forth in the table) / weighted average number of shares outstanding.

(5)

The ISS methodology multiplies awards (as set forth in the table) by a factor of 1.5 when calculating burn rate.

Burn Rate Based on Performance-Based Awards Earned
	Director Retainers (Restricted Shares)		Service-Based Restricted Shares		Performance- Based Restricted Shares(1)		Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding (000s)(2)		Burn Rate(3)		Burn Rate (ISS Methodology)(3)(4)
Fiscal 2019		10,254		42,573		43,152		16,756		0.57%		0.86%
Fiscal 2020		18,305		131,425		42,438		16,576		1.16%		1.74%
Fiscal 2021		11,148		42,855		—		16,631		0.32%		0.49%
Three-Year Average										0.69%		1.03%

(1)

“Performance-Based Restricted Shares” reflects the number of restricted shares actually earned pursuant to performance-based equity awards approved during the prior fiscal year (based on our actual earnings per share during the preceding fiscal year). In fiscal 2020, our NC&G Committee approved performance-based equity awards based on our relative total shareholder return over a three year performance period; accordingly, no awards are listed for fiscal 2021 given actual performance is undeterminable at this time.

(2)

Reflects basic weighted average number of shares outstanding during the applicable period.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(3)

Burn rate = number of shares awarded (as set forth in the table) / weighted average number of shares outstanding.

(4)

The ISS methodology multiplies all awards (as set forth in the table) by a factor of 1.5 when calculating burn rate.

We believe that our NC&G Committee’s recent use of the LTIP as a vehicle for rewarding and incentivizing key employees to deliver long-term value to our shareholders reflects a conservative and prudent use of equity-based compensation, as reflected in the burn rate metrics noted above. While the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the LTIP in future years, after giving effect to the proposed amendment, may provide several additional years of equity-based awards based on our recent burn rate, our Board believes that it is appropriate to request additional shares for issuance pursuant to the LTIP at this time given the difficulty in projecting the number of actual shares that will be earned based on currently outstanding (and potential future) awards for which performance is based on a multi-year performance period.

Types of Awards

The following is a summary of the types of awards that may be made under the LTIP:

Stock Options

Under the LTIP, our NC&G Committee may grant stock options (which may be incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code or non-incentive stock options) that entitle the optionee to purchase shares of our common stock at a price equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. The option may specify that the exercise price is payable by the optionee (i) in cash, (ii) by the transfer to our company of unrestricted shares of our common stock, (iii) with any other legal consideration the NC&G Committee may deem appropriate or (iv) any combination of these. Except as specified under the award by the NC&G Committee in the event of a change of control or similar event, or the participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement, no stock option may be exercised earlier than the first anniversary of the grant date. In addition, no stock option may be exercised more than 10 years from the grant date. Each grant may specify a period of continuous employment with our company or any of our subsidiaries (or in the case of a non-employee director, service on our Board) that is necessary before the stock option or any portion thereof will become exercisable.

SARs

Our NC&G Committee may grant SARs that entitle the participant to receive a payment equal to a percentage (not exceeding 100%) of the difference between the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date and on the date of exercise. The grant may specify that the amount payable to the participant upon exercise of the SAR may be paid (i) in cash, (ii) in shares of our common stock or (iii) any combination of these. Any grant may specify a waiting period before the SARs may become exercisable and permissible dates or periods on or during which the SARs are exercisable. Each grant of a SAR must specify the period of continuous employment of the participant by our company or any of our subsidiaries that is necessary before the SAR or installments thereof may be exercisable. Except as specified under the award by the NC&G Committee in the event of a change of control or similar event, or the participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement, no SAR may be exercised earlier than the first anniversary of the grant date.

Restricted Share Awards

Our NC&G Committee may authorize grants to participants of restricted shares. An award of restricted shares involves the immediate transfer to a participant of ownership of a specific number of shares in return for the performance of services. The participant is entitled immediately to voting, dividend and other ownership rights in such shares, subject to the discretion of our NC&G Committee. The transfer may be made without additional consideration from the participant. Our NC&G Committee may specify performance objectives that must be achieved for the restrictions to lapse or for the restricted shares to be granted. Restricted shares may be subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code for a period to be determined by our NC&G Committee. At the discretion of our NC&G Committee, any grant or sale of restricted shares may provide for the earlier termination of the risk of forfeiture in the event of a change of control of our company or a similar event or in the event of the participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement. Except under the foregoing circumstances as approved by our NC&G Committee, restricted shares are subject to a minimum one year vesting period (provided that restricted share awards subject to a performance period may include the performance period as part of the one year minimum vesting period).

RSUs

Our NC&G Committee may authorize grants to participants of RSUs. Each grant may specify one or more performance objectives to be met within a specified period in order for the participant to earn all or some portion of the RSUs. At the discretion of our NC&G Committee, the settlement date for RSU awards may be accelerated in the event of a change of control of our company or a similar event or in the event of the participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement. Except under the foregoing circumstances as approved by our NC&G Committee, the settlement date for RSUs

6 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

must be at least one year following the grant date (provided that RSU awards subject to a performance period may include the performance period as part of the one year minimum settlement date). To the extent earned, RSUs will be paid to the participant at the time and in the manner determined by our NC&G Committee in (i) cash, (ii) shares of our common stock or (iii) any combination thereof. Any grant of RSUs may provide for the payment to the participant of dividend equivalents in cash or in additional shares of stock on a current, deferred or contingent basis.

Other Stock-Based Awards

Under the LTIP, as amended by our Board in March 2022, our NC&G Committee would have the right to grant other awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, shares of common stock, subject to such terms and conditions as our NC&G Committee may determine. At the discretion of our NC&G Committee, the settlement date for other stock-based awards may be accelerated in the event of a change of control of our company or a similar event or in the event of the participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement. Except under the foregoing circumstances as approved by our NC&G Committee, the settlement date for other stock-based awards must be at least one year following the grant date (provided that other stock-based awards subject to a performance period may include the performance period as part of the one year minimum settlement date). To the extent earned, other stock-based awards will be paid to the participant at the time and in the manner determined by our NC&G Committee in (i) cash, (ii) shares of our common stock or (iii) any combination thereof. Any grant of other stock-based awards may provide for the payment to the participant of dividend equivalents in cash or in additional shares of stock on a current, deferred or contingent basis.

Performance-Based Compensation

Awards granted under the LTIP may be subject to specified performance criteria established by the NC&G Committee. Such performance goals may include, but are not limited to, performance based on one or more of the following criteria:

•

EBITDA;

•

EBIT;

•

net earnings;

•

net income;

•

operating income;

•

earnings per share;

•

book value per share;

•

return on shareholders’ equity;

•

capital expenditures;

•

expenses and expense ratio management;

•

return on investment;

•

improvements in capital structure;

•

profitability of an identifiable business unit or product;

•

maintenance or improvement of profit margins;

•

stock price;

•

market share;

•

revenues or sales;

•

costs;

•

cash flow;

•

working capital;

•

return on (net) assets;

•

economic value added;

•

gross or net profit before or after taxes;

•

objectively determinable goals with respect to service or product delivery, service or product quality, inventory management, customer satisfaction, meeting budgets and/or retention of employees; or

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

total shareholder return or relative total shareholder return.

Adjustments

The LTIP provides that (i) the NC&G Committee may make appropriate equitable adjustments to the maximum number of shares of our stock available for issuance under, and other sublimits stated in, the plan and (ii) the NC&G Committee shall make appropriate equitable adjustments to the number of shares covered by outstanding awards and the exercise prices and performance measures applicable to outstanding awards, in any case to reflect changes in our capital structure on account of any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization or other change in capital structure, any merger, consolidation, spin-off, spin-out, split-off, split-up, reorganization or partial or complete liquidation or other distribution of assets of our company or any event constituting an equity restructuring under the Code. These adjustments will be made only to the extent they conform to the requirements of applicable provisions of the Code.

Transferability

Except as provided below, no award under the LTIP may be transferred by a participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and stock options and SARs may be exercised during the participant’s lifetime only by the participant or, in the event of the participant’s legal incapacity, the guardian or legal representative acting on behalf of the participant. Our NC&G Committee may expressly provide in an award agreement (other than an incentive stock option award agreement) that the participant may transfer the award to a spouse or lineal descendant, a trust for the exclusive benefit of such family members, a partnership or other entity in which all the beneficial owners are such family members or any other entity affiliated with the participant that our NC&G Committee may approve.

Amendment

Our Board may amend the LTIP at any time, except that no amendment or termination may be made without shareholder approval if the amendment would increase the number of shares reserved for issuance and delivery under the plan or otherwise increase the sublimits on (i) the number of shares of our common stock issuable under incentive stock options granted under the LTIP or (ii) the number of shares issuable to any participant in one calendar year. Our NC&G Committee may not reprice any stock option or stock appreciation right or purchase, cancel or buy out an underwater stock option or stock appreciation right, except with shareholder approval.

Duration

The LTIP will remain in effect until terminated by our Board.

United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of certain material United States federal income tax consequences that generally will arise with respect to awards granted under the LTIP. This summary is based on the federal tax laws in effect as of the date of this proxy statement. Changes to these laws could alter the tax consequences described below. This summary does not constitute tax advice or describe federal employment, state, local or foreign tax consequences. Each LTIP participant is advised to consult with his or her tax advisor concerning the tax implications of participating in the LTIP.

Incentive Stock Options (or “ISOs”)

No taxable income is recognized by a participant on the grant or vesting of an ISO. If a participant exercises an ISO in accordance with its terms and does not dispose of the shares acquired within two years after the date of the grant of the ISO or within one year after the date of exercise, the participant will be entitled to treat any gain related to the exercise of the ISO as a capital gain (instead of compensation income). If a participant holds the shares acquired for at least one year from the exercise date and does not sell or otherwise dispose of the shares for at least two years from the grant date, the participant’s gain or loss upon a subsequent sale will be long-term capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and the participant’s basis in the shares acquired.

If a participant sells or otherwise disposes of the shares acquired without satisfying the required minimum holding period, such disqualifying disposition will give rise to compensation income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired on the exercise date (or, if less, the amount realized upon disqualifying disposition) over the participant’s tax basis in the shares acquired.

The rules that generally apply to ISOs do not apply when calculating any alternative minimum tax liability. The rules affecting the application of the alternative minimum tax are complex, and their effect depends on individual circumstances, including whether a participant has items of adjustment other than those derived from ISOs.

8 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Non-Incentive Stock Options

A participant will not have income upon the grant of a non-incentive stock option. A participant will have compensation income upon the exercise of a non-incentive stock option equal to the value of the stock on the day the participant exercised the option less the exercise price. Upon sale of the stock, the participant will have capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the sales proceeds and the value of the stock on the day the option was exercised. This capital gain or loss will be long-term if the participant has held the stock for more than one year and otherwise will be short-term.

SARs

A participant will not have income upon the grant of a SAR. A participant generally will recognize compensation income upon the exercise of a SAR equal to the amount of the cash and the fair market value of any stock received. Upon the sale of the stock, the participant will have capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the sales proceeds and the value of the stock on the day the SAR was exercised. This capital gain or loss will be long-term if the participant held the stock for more than one year and otherwise will be short-term.

Restricted Share Awards

A participant will not have income upon the grant of restricted shares unless an election under Section 83(b) of the Code is made within 30 days of the grant date. If a timely Section 83(b) election is made, then a participant will have compensation income equal to the value of the stock on the grant date less the purchase price, if any. When the stock is sold, the participant will have capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the sales proceeds and the value of the stock on the date of grant. If the participant does not make a Section 83(b) election, then when the stock vests, the participant will have compensation income equal to the value of the stock on the vesting date less the purchase price, if any. When the stock is sold, the participant will have capital gain or loss equal to the sales proceeds less the value of the stock on the vesting date. Any capital gain or loss will be long-term if the participant held the stock for more than one year and otherwise will be short-term.

RSUs

A participant will not have income upon the grant of an RSU. A participant is not permitted to make a Section 83(b) election with respect to an RSU award. When the stock or cash is distributed with respect to an RSU, the participant will have income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the stock or the amount of cash on the date of distribution less the purchase price, if any. When any such stock is sold, the participant will have capital gain or loss equal to the sales proceeds less the value of the stock previously taxed. Any capital gain or loss will be long-term if the participant held the stock for more than one year and otherwise will be short-term.

Other Stock-Based Awards

The tax consequences associated with any other stock-based award granted under the LTIP will vary depending on the specific terms of the award. Among the relevant factors are whether or not the award has a readily ascertainable fair market value, whether or not the award is subject to forfeiture provisions or restrictions on transfer, the nature of the property to be received by the participant under the award and the participant’s holding period and tax basis for the award or underlying common stock.

Tax Consequences to Us

There will generally be no tax consequences to us for any awards made under the LTIP, except that we may be entitled to a deduction if and when a participant has compensation income. Any such deduction will be subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code described below.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax deduction to publicly-traded companies for compensation, including stock awards, in excess of $1,000,000 for certain “covered employees” in any year. We anticipate that a portion of the compensation expense related to awards under the LTIP will not be deductible for tax purposes.

Section 409A

Section 409A of the Code imposes certain restrictions on amounts deferred under non-qualified deferred compensation plans and a 20% additional tax on amounts that are subject to, but do not comply with, Section 409A. Section 409A includes a broad definition of non-qualified deferred compensation plans, which includes certain types of equity incentive compensation. We intend for awards granted under the LTIP to be exempt from, or otherwise comply with, Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

New Plan Benefits

No new plan benefits table for the LTIP is included in this proxy statement. Except for the annual stock retainer grant equal to $100,000 to be granted to each of our non-employee directors pursuant to our non-employee director compensation program (which we anticipate may be increased to $110,000 for the fiscal 2022 cycle), the benefits or amounts that may be received by or allocated to participants in the LTIP in future years will be determined in the discretion of our NC&G Committee and, accordingly, the benefits that may be received by or allocated to participants in the LTIP in future years is not presently determinable.

Why We Believe Shareholders Should Vote in Favor of the LTIP, as Amended and Restated

Our Board believes that our success depends, in large part, upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees and non-employee directors and, as discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, our equity-based award program is the primary vehicle for offering long-term incentives to our executive officers.

We believe the LTIP includes provisions, or is otherwise subject to various safeguards, that are designed to protect our shareholders’ interests and to reflect compensation and governance best practices, including:

Independent Committee Administration

The LTIP is administered by our NC&G Committee, whose members are independent under the applicable NYSE listing standards, “non-employee” directors within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and “outside directors” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

No Discounted Awards

No stock option or SAR may be granted with a per share exercise price less than 100% of the fair market value of shares of our common stock on the grant date.

No Repricing of Stock Options or SARs

The LTIP prohibits the repricing of stock options and SARs, or the exchange of underwater stock options and SARs, in any case without shareholder approval.

Limits on Share Recycling

Shares of our common stock withheld to satisfy tax withholding on an award or to pay the exercise price of any award will not be added back to the number of shares available for issuance under the LTIP.

No Tax Gross-Ups

The LTIP does not provide for any tax gross-ups.

No Evergreen Feature

The LTIP does not include an evergreen funding feature under which the shares available for issuance under the LTIP can be automatically replenished.

Minimum Vesting Requirements

All awards under the LTIP must meet minimum one-year vesting requirements, subject to certain limited exceptions detailed in the plan document which may be approved by our NC&G Committee.

Annual Limit on Participant Awards

The LTIP provides for an annual limit on the number of shares that may be granted to an individual participant pursuant to LTIP awards.

Copies of the LTIP

This summary is not a complete description of all of the provisions of the LTIP. The summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the LTIP, a copy of which has been attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A (and which copy reflects the proposed amendments described above). Shareholders are encouraged to read the full text of the LTIP.

Required Vote

Approval of the LTIP requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Because broker non-votes are

10 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

counted as present at the annual meeting for quorum purposes but are not counted as entitled to vote on this proposal, they will have no effect on the vote to approve the LTIP, as amended and restated. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC. LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED.

Proposal No. 3: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Audit Committee is responsible for appointing and overseeing Oxford’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022, which appointment was ratified by our full Board. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent auditors since 2002.

Our Board considers Ernst & Young LLP to be well qualified and recommends that our shareholders vote to approve its selection. Although shareholder ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by law, our Board believes soliciting shareholder approval of Ernst & Young LLP’s selection to be a matter of good corporate governance. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to participate in the annual meeting. The representative will be given the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

Required Vote

Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022 requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. If our shareholders do not ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022, our Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022 and/or future years.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY ERNST & YOUNG LLP TO SERVE AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2022.

Proposal No. 4: Non-Binding, Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation

We are asking shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation practices, as described in this proxy statement. This “say-on-pay” proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our executive compensation practices. The vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

As further described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation programs are designed to maintain a strong link between pay and performance for our named executive officers; align our named executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders by creating a strong focus on stock ownership; and ensure that we are able to attract and retain talented individuals who can deliver excellent business performance.

Proposed Resolution

We are asking our shareholders to vote on the following resolution at the annual meeting:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion set forth herein.

Required Vote

Approval of the say-on-pay resolution requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Because broker

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

non-votes are counted as present at the annual meeting for quorum purposes but are not counted as entitled to vote on this proposal, they will have no effect on the vote on the resolution approving executive compensation. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

The vote on this say-on-pay proposal is advisory, and therefore the results of this proposal are not binding on our company, our NC&G Committee or our Board. The results of this proposal will not override any decision made by our Board or NC&G Committee. Our Board and our NC&G Committee value the input of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against this say-on-pay proposal, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and our NC&G Committee will evaluate whether any actions, in fiscal 2022 or in subsequent years, are appropriate to address those concerns.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

12 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Directors

Under our articles of incorporation, or charter, our Board must consist of at least nine members, with the specific number fixed by our bylaws, as amended from time to time. Our bylaws have currently set the number of our directors at 11 members, and we currently have 11 members serving on our Board.

Our charter provides that the members of our Board are to be divided into three classes. Our Board currently consists of three Class I directors (Messrs. Dennis M. Love, Clyde C. Tuggle and E. Jenner Wood III), four Class II directors (Messrs. Thomas C. Chubb III, John R. Holder, Stephen S. Lanier and Clarence H. Smith) and four Class III directors (Ms. Helen Ballard, Ms. Virginia A. Hepner, Mr. Thomas C. Gallagher and Mr. ~~E. Jenner Wood~~Milford W. McGuirt). The terms of our Class III ~~who are currently~~ directors ~~for re-election~~expire at the 2022 annual meeting, ~~our Board has nominated Ms. Virginia A. Hepner for election to serve as a director. Ms. Hepner was identified and recommended as a potential director nominee by non-management members~~while the terms of our ~~Board. After evaluating the experience, qualifications, attributes, skills~~Class I directors and ~~independence~~Class II directors expire in 2023 and 2024, respectively. As further described above under “Proposal No. 1: Election of ~~various prospective candidates, our Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee, or NC&G Committee, recommended to our Board that Ms. Hepner be nominated for election as a director~~Directors—Director Nominations,” Mr. Gallagher will retire at the end of our 2022 annual meeting.

Director Nominees

The following ~~table~~ sets forth, as of April ~~15, 2016,~~14, 2022, certain information concerning our nominees for director, ~~and our continuing directors,~~ as well as a description of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that each of these individuals should serve as a director.

Nominees for Class III Director

Name	Age	Director Since	Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications
Helen Ballard	67	1998	Ms. Ballard is the owner of Helen Ballard LLC, a company she formed in 2015 in the business of home furnishing products design. Prior to forming Helen Ballard LLC, Ms. Ballard founded Ballard Designs, Inc. in 1983 and served as its Chief Executive Officer until she retired from that position in 2002. Ballard Designs, Inc. is an omnichannel home furnishing retail business currently part of Qurate Retail, Inc.
			Ms. Ballard has more than 20 years of experience in a chief executive capacity. Ms. Ballard also previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of Cornerstone Brands, Inc., which was organized as a conglomerate of companies selling home and leisure goods and casual apparel through catalogs primarily aimed at affluent, well-educated consumers ages 35 to 60. Ms. Ballard’s experience in direct-to-consumer businesses serves our Board well.
Virginia A. Hepner	64	2016	Ms. Hepner retired from her position as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Woodruff Arts Center, a visual and performing arts center, in 2017. Ms. Hepner had served in this capacity since 2012. Prior to joining the Woodruff Arts Center, she served as a consultant to DMI Music and Media Solutions from 2011 until 2012. She is currently a principal investor in GHL, LLC, a private real estate investment partnership for commercial assets. Ms. Hepner retired from Wachovia Bank in 2005 as an Executive Vice President. Ms. Hepner serves as a director of Cadence Bank, including as Chair of its Audit Committee and a member of its Executive Compensation and Stock Incentive Committee. Ms. Hepner is also a member of the Board of Directors of National Vision Holdings, Inc., including as the Chair of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of its Audit Committee. Ms. Hepner previously served as a director of Chexar Corporation (now named Ingo Money, Inc.).
			Ms. Hepner has more than 25 years of corporate banking and capital markets experience, including having served as a senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities. Her financial expertise and leadership skills, also evidenced by her experience as a director of publicly held companies and overseeing various aspects of The Woodruff Arts Center’s operations, serve our Board well.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Name			Age			Director Since			Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications
	Milford W. McGuirt			65			2020			Mr. McGuirt retired as Managing Partner of the Atlanta office and Mid-South Region of KPMG in 2019. During a 33-year career at KPMG, Mr. McGuirt held a number of leadership positions, including as a senior partner and the National Audit Sector Leader and National Industry Leader for the firm’s higher education practice. Prior to joining KPMG, Mr. McGuirt served as an audit manager with Coopers & Lybrand. Mr. McGuirt became a member of the Board of Directors of Science Applications International Corp. in July 2021 and serves on its Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. McGuirt served as a member of the Board of Directors, Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of HD Supply Holdings, Inc. and HD Supply, Inc. from June 2020 until those companies’ acquisition by The Home Depot, Inc. in December 2020. Mr. McGuirt has more than 40 years of experience in public accounting and audit services, which included recognition as one of Atlanta’s Most Admired CEOs by the Atlanta Business Chronicle in 2017 when he was heading up KPMG’s Atlanta office and Mid-South Region. Mr. McGuirt’s professional experience, which includes extensive board and civic affiliations, provides our Board and Audit Committee with valuable financial expertise, governance insights and strategic leadership.

Name
Age Director Since Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications
Helen Ballard 61 1998 Ms. Ballard is the owner of Helen Ballard LLC, a company she formed in the business of home furnishing product design. Ms. Ballard founded Ballard Designs, Inc. in 1983 and served as Chief Executive Officer until she retired from that position in 2002. Ballard Designs, Inc. is a home furnishing catalog business which is currently part of HSN, Inc. Ms. Ballard also previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of Cornerstone Brands, Inc., which was organized as a conglomerate of companies selling home and leisure goods and casual apparel through catalogs primarily aimed at affluent, well-educated consumers ages 35 to 60.
Ms. Ballard has approximately 20 years of experience in a chief executive capacity. Ms. Ballard's experience in direct-to-consumer businesses, including a catalog business, in particular with business activities aimed at demographics overlapping those of our various operating groups, serves our Board well.

Thomas C. Chubb III

52

2012

Mr. Chubb is our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. He has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since 2013 and was elected our Chairman in 2015. Mr. Chubb served as our President starting in 2009, as our Executive Vice President from 2004 until 2009, and as our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 1999 to 2004.
Mr. Chubb has been employed by our company for 25 years, and has been an executive with our company for more than 15 years. In his capacity as our President starting in 2009, Mr. Chubb provided direct oversight with respect to the operations of our Lanier Apparel Group and our former Ben Sherman Group and, starting with our acquisition of those operations in 2010, provided direct oversight with respect to the operations of our Lilly Pulitzer Group. In addition, Mr. Chubb's previous experience as our General Counsel gives him key insights into the business, legal and regulatory environment in which we operate. Mr. Chubb's long history with our organization, his leadership skills and his knowledge of our businesses and industry serve our Board well.

14 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Continuing Directors

~~Table~~The following sets forth, as of ~~Contents~~April 14, 2022, certain information concerning our current Class I and Class II directors, whose terms expire in 2023 and 2024, respectively, as well as a description of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that each of these individuals should serve as a director. Each of our Class I and Class II directors is currently expected to remain in office for the remainder of his or her current term.

Name	Age	Director Since	Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications
Thomas C. Chubb III	58	2012	Mr. Chubb is our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Chubb has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since 2013 and was elected our Chairman in 2015. Mr. Chubb served as our President starting in 2009, as our Executive Vice President from 2004 until 2009, and as our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 1999 to 2004. Mr. Chubb is a member of the Board of Directors and Audit and Finance Committees of Flowers Foods, Inc.
			Mr. Chubb has been an executive with our company for more than 20 years. Mr. Chubb was instrumental in our company’s transformation from its historical domestic private label manufacturing roots to becoming a leading portfolio company engaged in the design, sourcing, marketing and distribution of lifestyle branded apparel products. Mr. Chubb’s previous experience as our General Counsel also gives him key insights into the business, legal and regulatory environment in which we operate. Mr. Chubb’s long history with our organization, his leadership skills and his knowledge of our businesses and industry serve our Board well.
John R. Holder	67	2009	Mr. Holder is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Holder Properties, Inc., a commercial and residential real estate development, acquisitions, leasing and management company, and has held that position since 1989. He is a member of the Board of Directors and Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of Genuine Parts Company and also serves on the Board of Directors of SunTrust Bank’s Atlanta Region.
			Mr. Holder has demonstrated strategic leadership in growing Holder Properties, which has developed over 14 million square feet of commercial and student housing space valued in excess of $3 billion, and also has extensive involvement in the financial and marketing areas of that business. His service as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Holder Properties, together with various board affiliations, including civic organizations, has given him leadership experience, business acumen and financial literacy beneficial to our Board and Audit Committee.
Stephen S. Lanier	44	2018	Mr. Lanier is a Managing Partner of Fremantle Capital, LLC, a private investment firm that seeks to acquire or invest in mature, lower middle market companies primarily in the Southeastern U.S. and Texas. Prior to co-founding Fremantle Capital in 2017, Mr. Lanier spent seven years in leadership positions in operations, compliance, governmental affairs and the office of the general counsel of Southern Company, one of the nation’s largest energy companies. Before joining Southern Company, Mr. Lanier served in the Central Intelligence Agency during the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations. Mr. Lanier began his career as a securities analyst for Merrill Lynch. Mr. Lanier currently serves on the Board of Directors of Stonecreek Dental Care.
			Mr. Lanier has more than 15 years of private and public sector experience in multiple industries. Mr. Lanier has extensive middle market M&A experience and has worked internationally in various regions. He has a strong financial background, as well as insight into the global markets and regulatory environments in which we operate, all of which provides valuable insights to our Board and Audit Committee.
Dennis M. Love	66	2008	Mr. Love is the retired Chairman of Printpack Inc., a manufacturer of flexible and specialty rigid packaging, a position he held from 2005 until 2017. Mr. Love also served as Chief Executive Officer of Printpack Inc. from 1987 until his retirement from that position in 2016. Mr. Love served as a director of AGL Resources, Inc. from 1999 until that company’s merger with Southern Company in 2016.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name	Age	Director Since	Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications
			Mr. Love has approximately 30 years of experience as a chief executive and has extensive service as a director of public companies. The insight Mr. Love gained through these affiliations serves our Board well. In addition, Mr. Love’s stewardship of Printpack Inc.’s successful domestic and international acquisitions allows him to offer key insights into our operations and strategic decision making, making him a valuable asset to our Board and Audit Committee.
Clarence H. Smith	71	2003	Mr. Smith is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc., a full-service home furnishings retailer. Mr. Smith was elected Chairman of Havertys in 2012 and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since 2003. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Havertys from 2003 to 2021, and has served in various other senior management positions at Havertys since 1996. Mr. Smith also serves on the Executive Committee of Havertys.
			Mr. Smith has 25+ years of senior management experience at Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc., an Atlanta-based, publicly traded company with over 100 stores in 16 states, which affords our Board and our NC&G Committee valuable insight into compensation, governance and general business practices at a company with a brand management focus and retail and other direct-to-consumer business activities.
Clyde C. Tuggle	61	2011	Mr. Tuggle is a co-founder of Pine Island Capital Partners, a middle-market private equity investment firm. Mr. Tuggle retired as Senior Vice President, Chief Global Public Affairs and Communications Officer of The Coca-Cola Company in 2017, a position he held since 2009, and subsequently served as Senior Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of Coca-Cola until 2018. During his 30-year career at Coca-Cola, Mr. Tuggle held a number of senior management roles, including as Executive Assistant (chief of staff) to the CEO; Deputy Division President, Central Europe; Senior Vice President, Worldwide Public Affairs and Communication; and President of Coca-Cola’s Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Division. Mr. Tuggle serves on the Board of Directors of Georgia Power Company.
			Mr. Tuggle has broad executive management experience at a publicly traded company heavily focused on brand management, which serves our Board well. In addition, Mr. Tuggle’s experience at Coca-Cola, which includes oversight of investor relations and public communications issues, provides key insights to our Board and Audit Committee.
E. Jenner Wood III	70	1995	Mr. Wood served as Corporate Executive Vice President of SunTrust Banks, Inc. from 1994 until his retirement in 2016. He also served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlanta Division of SunTrust Bank from 2014 to 2015. During his 40+ year career at SunTrust Bank, Mr. Wood served in various corporate executive positions, including as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlanta/Georgia Division, the Georgia/North Florida Division, and SunTrust Bank Central Group. Mr. Wood is a director of Southern Company, where he serves on the Finance and Compensation and Management Succession Committees, and Genuine Parts Company, where he serves on the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee.
			Mr. Wood’s professional career includes more than 20 years in executive management positions with SunTrust Banks, Inc. and its various affiliates. Mr. Wood’s insights with respect to financial issues and the financial services industry generally, including as it relates to the retail and business aspects of SunTrust Banks’ operations, together with his extensive experience on the boards of directors and committees of various public and private companies, make him a valuable asset to our Board.

Name
Age Director Since Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications
Thomas C. Gallagher 68 2013 (previous service
1991 - 2007)
Mr. Gallagher is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Genuine Parts Company, a distributor of automotive replacement parts, industrial replacement parts, office products and electrical/electronic materials. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Genuine Parts Company in 2004 and Chairman of the Board of Genuine Parts Company in 2005. Mr. Gallagher served as President of Genuine Parts Company from 1990 to 2012 and Chief Operating Officer of Genuine Parts Company from 1990 until 2004.
Mr. Gallagher has more than 25 years of executive-level responsibilities with a NYSE-traded public company; brings extensive experience serving on the boards of directors of other companies, including having served on the board of directors of Genuine Parts Company for more than 20 years and having previously served on the boards of directors of STI Classic Funds, STI Classic Variable Trust and National Services Industries, Inc.; and is extremely familiar with our company, having previously served on our Board for more than 15 years, including at the outset of our transformation away from our historical domestic private label manufacturing roots. Mr. Gallagher's business acumen, financial expertise and leadership skills are a valuable asset to our Board and Audit Committee.

Virginia A. Hepner

58

Nominee

Ms. Hepner is President and Chief Executive Officer of The Woodruff Arts Center and has held that position since 2012. Prior to joining the Woodruff Arts Center, she served as a consultant to DMI Music and Media Solutions from 2011 until 2012. She is also currently a principal investor in GHL, LLC, a private real estate investment partnership for commercial assets. Ms. Hepner retired from Wachovia Bank in 2005 as an Executive Vice President. Ms. Hepner serves as a director of State Bank and Trust Company, as well as its holding company State Bank Financial Corporation.
In recommending Ms. Hepner to serve on our Board of Directors, our NC&G Committee noted Ms. Hepner's more than 25 years of corporate banking and capital markets experience, as well as her oversight of various aspects of The Woodruff Arts Center's operations, that are expected to serve our Board of Directors well.

John R. Holder

61

2009

Mr. Holder is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Holder Properties, Inc., a commercial and residential real estate development, leasing and management company, and has held that position since 1989. Mr. Holder has served as Chief Executive Officer of Holder Properties since 1980. He is a member of the Board of Directors and Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of Genuine Parts Company and also serves on the Board of Directors of SunTrust Bank's Atlanta Region.
Mr. Holder's strategic leadership in the growth of Holder Properties, as well as his extensive involvement in the financial and marketing areas of that business, serves our Board well. His service as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Holder Properties, together with various board affiliations which has included civic organizations and membership on the Audit and Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committees of Genuine Parts Company, has given him leadership experience, business acumen and financial literacy beneficial to our Board and Audit Committee.

~~Table of Contents~~

Name
Age Director Since Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications

J. Reese Lanier

73

1974

Mr. Lanier was self-employed in farming and related businesses until his retirement in 2009.
Mr. Lanier has been affiliated with our company in various official and unofficial capacities for more than 50 years, including having served as a director for more than 40 years. His father was one of the founders of our company. Mr. Lanier's deep knowledge of our business and industry, coupled with his business acumen as a sole proprietor, serves our Board well.

Dennis M. Love

60

2008

Mr. Love is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Printpack Inc., a manufacturer of flexible and specialty rigid packaging. Mr. Love was elected Chairman of Printpack Inc. in 2013, and has served as Chief Executive Officer of Printpack Inc. since 1987. Mr. Love also served as President of Printpack Inc. from 1987 until 2013. Mr. Love has been a director of AGL Resources, Inc. since 1999, currently serving as a member of its Audit and Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committees. Mr. Love is also a director of the Cleveland Group, Inc. and a member of the SunTrust Advisory Board.
Mr. Love has close to 30 years of experience as a chief executive and has extensive service as a director of public companies, including having served on the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee of AGL Resources, Inc. The insight Mr. Love gained through these board affiliations serves our Board and our NC&G Committee well. In addition, Mr. Love's stewardship of Printpack Inc.'s international operations, as well as successful domestic and international acquisitions, allows him to offer key insights into our operations and strategic decision making.

Clarence H. Smith

65

2003

Mr. Smith is Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc., a full-service home furnishings retailer. Mr. Smith was elected Chairman of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. in 2012 and has served as its President and Chief Executive Officer since 2003. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. from 2002 to 2003, Chief Operating Officer of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. from 2000 to 2002, and Senior Vice President, General Manager-Stores of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Smith serves on the Executive Committee of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
Mr. Smith has 20 years of senior management experience at Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc., an Atlanta-based, publicly traded company with over 100 stores in 16 states in the Southern, mid-Atlantic and Midwestern regions of the United States, which affords our Board and NC&G Committee valuable insight into compensation, governance and general business practices at a company with a brand management focus and retail and other direct-to-consumer business activities.

16 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Table of Contents~~

Name
Age Director Since Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications
Clyde C. Tuggle 54 2011 Mr. Tuggle is Senior Vice President and Chief Public Affairs and Communications Officer of The Coca-Cola Company. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Tuggle worked in Coca-Cola's Central European Division Office in Vienna where he held a variety of positions, including as Director of Operations Development, Deputy to the Division President and Region Manager for Austria. In 2000, Mr. Tuggle was elected Vice President of The Coca-Cola Company. In 2003, he was elected Senior Vice President of The Coca-Cola Company and appointed Director of Worldwide Public Affairs and Communications. From 2005 until 2008, Mr. Tuggle served as President of Coca-Cola's Russia, Ukraine & Belarus Business Unit. From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Tuggle served as Coca-Cola's Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Productivity. In 2009, Mr. Tuggle was named Coca-Cola's Senior Vice President, Global Public Affairs and Communications. Mr. Tuggle has served on the Board of Directors of Georgia Power Company since 2012.
Mr. Tuggle has more than 10 years of executive management experience at a publicly traded company heavily focused on brand management, including oversight of various aspects of Coca-Cola's international operations that serve our Board well. In addition, Mr. Tuggle's experience at Coca-Cola includes oversight of investor relations and public communications issues that provide key insights to our Board and Audit Committee.

E. Jenner Wood III

64

1995

Mr. Wood is Corporate Executive Vice President of SunTrust Banks, Inc. and has held that title since 1994. He also served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlanta Division of SunTrust Bank from 2014 to October 2015. Mr. Wood served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlanta/Georgia Division of SunTrust Bank from 2010 to 2013 and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Georgia/North Florida Division of SunTrust Bank from 2013 through March 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Wood had served as President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SunTrust Bank Central Group from 2002 to 2010. Mr. Wood is a director of The Southern Company and Genuine Parts Company. Mr. Wood serves on the Governance and Nuclear/Operations Committees of The Southern Company and on the Audit and Compensation and Governance Committees of Genuine Parts Company. Mr. Wood previously served as a director of Crawford & Company until his retirement from that position in July 2013. Mr. Wood also previously served as a director of Georgia Power Company until his election to the Board of Directors of that entity's parent company, The Southern Company, in 2012.
Mr. Wood's professional career includes more than 20 years in executive management positions with SunTrust Banks, Inc. and its various affiliates. Mr. Wood's insights with respect to financial issues and the financial services industry generally, including as it relates to the retail and business aspects of SunTrust Bank's operations, together with his extensive experience on the boards of directors and committees of various public and private companies, make him a valuable asset to our Board.

Director Skills and Qualifications

The following matrix highlights certain relevant qualifications, skills and experiences of our director nominees and continuing directors. The qualifications summarized in this matrix are not exhaustive, as each of our directors brings a broad array of insights and experiences that serve our Board well. We believe that each of our directors possesses the knowledge and skills necessary to contribute to the effective oversight of our business and operations.

Ballard

Chubb

Hepner

Holder

Lanier

Love

McGuirt

Smith

Tuggle

Wood

Executive Leadership Experience

Public Company Board Experience

Consumer Insights and Branding

Finance and Accounting

Risk Oversight

Mergers and Acquisitions

Product Development, Sourcing and Merchandising

ESG and Regulatory

Independence

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that we will have a majority of ~~"independent"~~“independent” directors under the ~~NYSE's~~New York Stock Exchange’s (“NYSE’s”) listing standards, as determined by the Board, and that, at least annually, our NC&G Committee will review each relationship that exists with a director and his or her related interests for the purpose of determining whether the director is independent. Based in part on our NC&G ~~Committee's~~Committee’s review, our Board annually considers the independence of each of our ~~directors, as well as upon learning about intervening events that may impact director independence.~~

directors.

~~Table of Contents~~

InAt its respective March ~~2016,~~2022 meeting, each of our NC&G Committee and full Board considered director independence. As part of this consideration, our NC&G Committee and Board broadly considered all relevant facts and circumstances, including the ~~NYSE's~~NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards and all relevant transactions and relationships between each director ~~(and his or her~~(including each director’s immediate family members and other affiliates) and our company ~~and~~and/or management to determine whether any relationship might impair the ~~director's~~director’s ability to make independent judgments.

Based on this review and consistent with the recommendation of our NC&G Committee, our Board affirmatively determined that all 10 of our non-employee directors (Mses. Ballard and Hepner and Messrs. Gallagher, Holder, Lanier, Love, McGuirt, Smith, Tuggle and Wood) are independent. In evaluating the ~~following nine~~independence of our directors, ~~are independent: Helen Ballard; Thomas C. Gallagher; George C. Guynn; John R. Holder; J. Reese Lanier; Dennis M. Love; Clarence H. Smith; Clyde C. Tuggle;~~our NC&G Committee and ~~E. Jenner Wood III. Additionally,~~Board gave particular consideration to director tenure, overlapping service on various other company boards of directors and personal and familial relationships among current and former executives and directors of our ~~Board~~company, deeming none of ~~Directors has determined that the new nominee, Ms. Virginia A. Hepner, is independent.~~

these relationships material to those individuals’ independence.

Mr. Chubb is currently our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and therefore not ~~independent.~~

~~In evaluating the independence of our directors, our Board and NC&G Committee gave particular consideration to the following relationships and transactions:~~

•: Mr. Thomas C. Gallagher served on our Board from 1991 until 2007, when he resigned in order to eliminate a director interlock relationship that existed based on service by our retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. J. Hicks Lanier, on the Compensation Committee of Genuine Parts Company; Mr. J. Hicks Lanier served as a member of the Board and chair of the Compensation Committee of Genuine Parts Company until his retirement from those positions in 2013; and two of our other directors, John R. Holder and E. Jenner Wood III, currently serve as directors of Genuine Parts Company;
•: Mr. J. Reese Lanier beneficially owns or has the ability to direct the voting of 1.3% of our outstanding common stock; and Mr. Lanier is a first cousin of Mr. J. Hicks Lanier, our retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
•: ~~Mr. Clyde C. Tuggle's employer, The Coca-Cola Company, is a vendor to our company, including providing products to our Tommy Bahama Group's restaurant division in the ordinary course of business; and~~
•: Mr. E. Jenner Wood III is Corporate Executive Vice President of SunTrust Banks, Inc.; during 2015, our company continued its long-standing banking relationship with SunTrust, which includes a syndicated, revolving credit facility that we maintain with SunTrust; the payments we made to SunTrust representedconsidered an ~~immaterial percentage of the Company's and SunTrust's revenues in 2015; and Mr. Wood did not personally participate in or benefit from this relationship.~~

Our Board determined that these payments and relationships were not material to a determination that the applicable directors were independent. As a result and taking into consideration, among other things, the objectivity of Messrs. Gallagher, J. Reese Lanier, Tuggle and Wood at previous meetings of our Board, our Board determined that each is independent.

independent director.

Corporate Governance Guidelines; Conduct Policies

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that set forth certain guidelines for the operation of the Board and its committees. In accordance with its charter, our NC&G Committee periodically reviews and assesses the adequacy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. As provided under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board annually conducts a ~~self-evaluation. Our~~self-evaluation, which our NC&G Committee ~~oversees our Board's self-evaluation process.~~oversees. Our Board has the authority to engage its own advisors and consultants.

Our Board has also adopted a Code of Conduct ~~for~~applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, as well as an ethical conduct policy that applies to our senior financial officers, ~~including~~specifically our chief executive officer and our chief financial ~~officer and controller.~~officer. We intend, if applicable, to disclose amendments to our Code of Conduct and our ethical conduct policy for our senior financial officers (other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments) and material waivers of (or failure to enforce) any provisions of these conduct policies (if applicable to any of our directors or executive officers) on our ~~Internet~~ website at www.oxfordinc.com.

Board Meetings and Committees of our Board of Directors

During fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, our Board held ~~five~~four meetings and committees of our Board held a total of ~~nine~~six meetings. During fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, each of our directors attended ~~at least 75%~~100% of the aggregate number of meetings of our Board ~~of Directors~~ and of all committees of which the director was a ~~member during the period he or she was a director or committee~~ member. Although we do not have a formal policy requiring attendance by directors at our annual meetings

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of shareholders, as stated in our

~~Table of Contents~~

Corporate Governance Guidelines, we encourage directors to attend our annual meetings of ~~shareholders in person. In order to facilitate attendance by our directors, we generally schedule our annual meetings of shareholders to coincide with the date of a quarterly meeting of our Board.~~shareholders. All of our directors attended our ~~2015~~2021 annual ~~meeting of shareholders.~~

meeting.

Our Board has a standing Executive Committee, Audit Committee and NC&G Committee. The following table identifies the members of each of these committees as of April ~~15, 2016~~14, 2022 and the number of ~~official~~ meetings (and actions taken by written consent in lieu of meetings) held by each of these committees during fiscal ~~2015.~~

2021.

Name	Executive Committee	Audit Committee	NC&G Committee
Helen Ballard*			X
Thomas C. Chubb III	chair
Thomas C. Gallagher*		X
Virginia A. Hepner*			X
John R. Holder*		X
Stephen S. Lanier*		X
Dennis M. Love*	X	chair
Milford W. McGuirt*		X
Clarence H. Smith*	X		chair
Clyde C. Tuggle*		X
E. Jenner Wood III*	X		X
Total Number of Meetings	0	4	2
Actions by Written Consent	0	1	2

Name
Executive Committee Audit Committee NC&G
Committee
Helen Ballard*
X
Thomas C. Chubb III
chair
Thomas C. Gallagher*
X
George C. Guynn*
chair
John R. Holder*
X
J. Reese Lanier*

Dennis M. Love*
X X
Clarence H. Smith*
X chair
Clyde C. Tuggle*
X
E. Jenner Wood III*
X

Total Number of Meetings
2 4 3

*

Independent Director

Executive Committee

Our Executive Committee has the power to exercise the authority of the full Board in managing the business and affairs of our company, except ~~that our Executive Committee does not have~~ certain powers that are reserved to our full Board under Georgia law. In practice, our Executive Committee serves as a means for taking action requiring our ~~Board's~~Board’s approval between its regularly scheduled meetings.

Audit Committee

~~Our~~

The purpose of our Audit Committee ~~was established in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (which we refer to as the "SEC")~~is to assist our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to ~~oversight of~~ the following: (1) the integrity of our financial statements, reporting processes and systems of internal controls; (2) our compliance with applicable laws and regulations; (3) the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; and (4) the performance of our internal audit department and our independent registered public accounting firm.

The principal duties and responsibilities of our Audit Committee are set forth in its charter. Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee has full access to our books, records, facilities and personnel, as well as the express authority to retain, at our ~~company's~~company’s expense, any outside legal, accounting or other advisors that it deems necessary or helpful to the performance of its responsibilities. ~~Our~~Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee is also charged with reviewing our guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including cybersecurity risks and major financial risk exposures, and the steps taken by our management to monitor and manage those risks. In addition, our Audit Committee may exercise additional authority prescribed from time to time by our Board.

Our Board annually evaluates the financial expertise and independence of the members of our Audit Committee. Following its review in March ~~2016,~~2022, our Board determined that Mr. ~~Guynn~~Holder and Mr. ~~Holder~~Love are ~~"audit~~“audit committee financial experts,"” as that term is defined by ~~SEC~~the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (which we refer to as the “SEC”), and that all of the members of our Audit Committee are financially literate in accordance with the ~~NYSE's~~NYSE’s governance listing standards and SEC rules and regulations.

Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee (or NC&G Committee)

The purpose of our NC&G Committee is to: (1) assist our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to the compensation of our executive officers; (2) recommend candidates for all directorships to be filled; (3) identify individuals qualified to serve as members of our Board; (4) review and recommend committee appointments; (5) take a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance; (6) develop and recommend our Corporate Governance Guidelines to our Board for adoption; (7) lead our Board in an annual review of its own performance; and (8) perform other functions that it deems necessary or appropriate. ~~Our Board has determined that all members of our NC&G Committee are independent in~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~accordance with the NYSE's corporate governance listing standards.~~ Pursuant to its charter, our NC&G Committee has the express authority to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, independent legal counsel or other advisor, at our ~~company's~~company’s expense.

18 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our NC&G Committee also has the following responsibilities, among others, related to compensation matters: (1) administering our restricted stock and stock option ~~and restricted stock~~ plans; (2) ~~administering our Executive Performance Incentive Plan, or "EPIP"; (3)~~ reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluating our Chief Executive ~~Officer's~~Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer based upon this evaluation; ~~(4)~~(3) reviewing and approving the compensation of our non-CEO executive officers; and ~~(5)~~(4) making recommendations to our Board regarding certain incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans. In addition, as part of its oversight of our overall compensation program, our NC&G Committee considers our compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may influence excessive risk taking.

~~In light of NYSE rules, our Board evaluated the independence of the members of our NC&G Committee.~~

Following its review in March ~~2016,~~2022, our Board determined that all of the members of our NC&G Committee are independent and meet the enhanced independence standards applicable to compensation committee members ~~in accordance with~~under the ~~NYSE's~~NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards and SEC rules and regulations.

Environmental, Social and Governance Oversight

~~For~~Our Board is ultimately charged with overseeing the risks to our business on behalf of our shareholders, and we believe that our Board’s active involvement in oversight of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and initiatives affords us tremendous benefits. Our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our enterprise risk management (ERM) program, and management reports quarterly to the Audit Committee on the status of various aspects of the ERM program. As part of our management’s execution of the ERM program, specific consideration is given to risks to our business associated with our supply chain, as well as the health and safety of employees and customers, privacy and data security and sustainability. In addition, our General Counsel reports quarterly to the Audit Committee about any questions relating to ethics or our Code of Conduct raised by individuals within our organization and/or externally. Our NC&G Committee has broad oversight responsibilities for, among other things, our governance structure, including expectations and requirements embedded in our charter, bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, and our executive compensation policies and practices. Within our Corporate team, we have a cross-functional steering committee comprised of our Senior Vice President of Operations, our Chief Human Resources Officer, our General Counsel/Treasurer, our Vice President of Strategic Planning and Business Development and our Corporate Social Responsibility Manager who, with input from others on our Executive Leadership Teams, assess ESG opportunities within our industry and collaborate with our brands on potential opportunities to execute brand-specific ESG initiatives. Additional information ~~about the role~~regarding oversight of ~~executive officers and compensation consultants in determining compensation, see "~~ESG matters within our company, as well as our company’s corporate social responsibility initiatives, may be found on our website at www.oxfordinc.com.~~Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis" below.~~

Meetings of Non-Employee Directors

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our non-employee directors periodically meet separately in executive sessions. Mr. Wood, as our ~~presiding independent~~lead director, chaired the meetings of our non-employee directors during fiscal ~~2015.~~

2021.

Board Leadership

Our Board is responsible for governing the affairs of our company ~~effectively~~ for the benefit of our shareholders. In discharging this responsibility, our Board relies on the judgment, business acumen and experience of our qualified management team. Our directors believe that the appropriate leadership structure for our Board may change from time to time. As stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board does not have a policy as to whether our Chief Executive Officer should also serve as chair of our Board. The Board makes this decision as it deems appropriate from time to time based upon the relevant factors applicable to each case. ~~At least annually, the Board deliberates on and discusses the appropriate leadership structure for our Board based on the needs of our company.~~

Our Board is currently comprised of ~~nine~~10 independent directors and one management director (our current Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Mr. Chubb). ~~At the time of Mr. J. Hicks Lanier's retirement from our Board of Directors at the conclusion of our 2015 annual meeting, our Board elected~~In electing Mr. Chubb as our ~~Chief Executive Officer and President, to also serve as the chair of our Board. In making its decision,~~Chairman in 2015, our Board considered Mr. ~~Chubb's~~Chubb’s leadership ~~qualities,~~qualities; management ~~capability,~~capability; knowledge of ~~the~~our business and ~~industry, the~~industry; long-term, strategic perspective ~~he has~~ demonstrated over the course of many ~~years, his~~years; and performance as our Chief Executive Officer and ~~his demonstrated focus on growing long-term shareholder value.~~

~~The Board also noted that we have, in~~President.

In Mr. E. Jenner Wood III, we also have an active, engaged ~~presiding independent~~lead (independent) director. In his capacity as the ~~presiding independent~~lead director, Mr. Wood sets the agenda for, and chairs, executive sessions of our non-employee directors; serves as a liaison between independent directors and Mr. Chubb; and serves as a liaison between our shareholders and our independent directors. As ~~presiding independent~~lead director, Mr. Wood is in regular contact with Mr. Chubb about our operating results and activities, risks to our business, management succession and our business prospects.

We also have a supermajority of independent directors, regular meetings of our non-employee directors in executive session and an Audit Committee and NC&G Committee (each of which reports to our full Board on a quarterly basis on significant committee activities) comprised solely of independent directors. Our Board believes the current leadership structure, comprised of an executive chair and CEO balanced with a strong lead ~~independent~~ director ~~role~~ tasked with significant specified duties, is in the best interests of our company and shareholders.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 19

~~Table of Contents~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS ~~Board's Role in Risk Oversight~~

Our Board is ultimately charged with overseeing our business, including risks to our business, on behalf of our shareholders. In order to fulfill this responsibility, our Audit Committee, pursuant to its charter, reviews our policies with respect to our company's risk assessment and risk management. At our Audit Committee's direction and with its oversight, we conduct an enterprise risk management program (which we refer to as the "ERM program") on an ongoing basis. At each quarterly meeting of our Audit Committee, a significant portion of time is devoted to a management report to the committee on the status of the ERM program and/or particular risks faced by our company. Our Audit Committee actively engages management on potential strategies for reducing, eliminating or mitigating the risks to our organization. Our Audit Committee regularly reports to our Board on our ERM program, and our management at least annually provides our Board with a full report on our ERM program. In addition to our ERM program, our Board examines specific business risks in its regular reviews of our operating groups and also on a company-wide basis as part of its regular strategic reviews.

As part of its oversight of our overall compensation program, our NC&G Committee considers our compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may influence excessive risk taking. In particular, our compensation program provides for short-term cash incentive payments to individuals throughout our company based on satisfaction of pre-established performance targets. For employees within our various operating groups, these performance targets may be based on performance by the operating group, as a whole, or a specific business unit or business location within that operating group. Each cash incentive award for an individual employee within our organization is subject to a maximum amount payable to the individual. Our senior management and, with respect to our executive officers, our compensation committee, approve applicable performance targets taking into consideration our detailed, internal budgets for upcoming fiscal periods. These members of senior management have access to daily retail sales data and receive monthly financial reports, and they review and analyze deviations from the budgeted plans to assess whether, among other things, the deviations were the result of inappropriate risk taking. We have concluded that our compensation policies and procedures are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

~~Website Information~~

We have posted our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Conduct, our ethical conduct policy for our senior financial officers, our Audit Committee charter and our NC&G Committee charter under the "Corporate Governance" link under the "Investor Relations" tab on our Internet website at www.oxfordinc.com.

Director Nomination Process

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our NC&G Committee periodically reviews the skills and characteristics required of our ~~directors in the context of the make-up of our Board.~~directors. This assessment includes issues such as independence, expertise, age, diversity, general business knowledge and experience, financial literacy, availability and commitment, ~~and~~as well as other criteria that our NC&G Committee finds to be relevant.

~~Consistent~~ We believe continuity in director service promotes stability and provides our company with ~~our Corporate Governance Guidelines,~~the benefit of accumulated familiarity and insight. Accordingly, our NC&G ~~Committee recognizes that a diversity of viewpoints and practical experiences can enhance~~Committee’s process for identifying nominees reflects our ~~Board's effectiveness. Accordingly, it is the~~company’s practice of ~~our NC&G Committee in evaluating~~re-nominating incumbent directors whom the ~~diversity of potential director candidates~~committee believes will continue to ~~give particular consideration to the diverse experiences and perspectives that a prospective candidate may bring~~beneficially contribute to our Board.

In order to accomplish its objectives, our NC&G ~~Committee's~~Committee’s evaluations of potential candidates generally involve a review of the ~~candidate's~~candidate’s background and credentials, interviews of a candidate by members of our Board and discussions among our directors. Based on its evaluation in light of the foregoing factors, our NC&G Committee recommends candidates to our full Board which, in turn, selects candidates to be nominated for election by ~~the~~ shareholders or to be elected by our Board to fill a vacancy.

Board Diversity

Although our Board does not follow any ratio or formula to determine the appropriate composition of directors, consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our NC&G Committee recognizes that a diversity of viewpoints and practical experiences can enhance our Board’s effectiveness. Accordingly, it is the practice of our NC&G Committee in evaluating the diversity of potential director candidates to give particular consideration to the diverse experiences and perspectives that a prospective candidate may bring to our Board, including diversity of age, gender, race or ethnicity and professional experiences and skills. Although our NC&G Committee and Board routinely reassess the Board’s composition, we believe our directors possess the diversity of backgrounds, experiences and qualifications necessary for effective oversight and strategic decision-making. A snapshot of certain characteristics of our directors is depicted in the charts below.

Director Compensation

Compensation Program for Fiscal ~~2015~~

~~During~~2021

For fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, our non-employee directors ~~received compensation~~were compensated in accordance with the following program guidelines:

•

an annual stock retainer in the form of restricted stock (subject to a vesting period generally coinciding with one year of service on our Board) granted to each non-employee director with a grant date fair value of ~~$55,000;~~$100,000;

20 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

an annual cash retainer of ~~$30,000~~$45,000 payable in quarterly installments to each non-employee director;

and

•

~~Table of Contents~~

•: an additional ~~$12,500~~ annual cash retainer of $12,500 payable in quarterly installments to our lead director and the chairs of our Audit ~~Committee~~ and ~~our~~ NC&G ~~Committee; and~~Committees.
•: ~~a $1,250 meeting fee for each committee or board meeting attended.~~

To further ~~encourage~~facilitate our directors ~~to enhance~~increasing their ownership of our stock, our non-employee directors are given the option to elect to receive ~~the $30,000~~their annual cash ~~retainer~~retainers in the form of a one-time restricted stock grant having a grant date fair value ~~of $30,000.~~equal to the retainer. For fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, two of our non-employee directors elected to receive ~~the $30,000 annual~~their cash ~~retainer~~retainers in the form of restricted stock.

Director compensation is paid for the 12-month period commencing with each annual meeting of shareholders. The number of shares of our restricted stock to be issued in respect of each non-employee director's annual stock retainer (and in respect of the annual cash retainer, if a director elected to receive that portion of his retainer in the form of stock) was based on the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE as of the grant date for the restricted stock.

Under our ~~deferred compensation plan,~~Deferred Compensation Plan, our non-employee directors are eligible to defer receipt of up to 100% of their cash ~~retainers and/or board and committee meeting fees.~~retainers. Non-employee directors are permitted to ~~"invest"~~“invest” their deferred fees among a platform of investment options that are available to our eligible employees who participate in the plan. Our ~~deferred compensation plan~~Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan, and ~~participants'~~participants’ account balances are subject to the claims of our ~~company's~~company’s creditors. In the event that our company becomes insolvent, participants in the plan would be unsecured general creditors with respect to their account balances, which we believe further aligns the interests of our participating directors with the long-term interests of our shareholders. ~~Three~~Because our Deferred Compensation Plan does not provide above-market, fixed rates of return, earnings under the plan are not included in the table below under “—Director Compensation for Fiscal 2021.” One of our non-employee directors ~~participated~~elected to participate in our ~~deferred compensation plan~~Deferred Compensation Plan during fiscal ~~2015.~~

~~Employee directors do~~2021.

Director compensation is paid for the 12-month period commencing with each annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, the fiscal 2021 director compensation program described above applies to the period starting with the 2021 annual meeting held on June 15, 2021 and concluding with this year’s annual meeting and does not ~~receive~~coincide with our 2021 fiscal year for which director compensation is reported in the table below under “—Director Compensation for Fiscal 2021.”

As an ~~annual retainer or meeting fees~~employee director, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Mr. Thomas C. Chubb III, is not compensated for ~~their~~his service on our Board.

Director Compensation for Fiscal ~~2015~~

2021

The table below summarizes the compensation for our non-employee directors for fiscal ~~2015.~~

2021.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		All Other Compensation ($)(2)		Total ($)(3)
Helen Ballard		45,073		99,927		1,904		146,904
Thomas C. Gallagher		45,073		99,927		1,904		146,904
Virginia A. Hepner		45,073		99,927		1,904		146,904
John R. Holder		2		144,998		2,430		147,430
Stephen S. Lanier		45,073		99,927		1,904		146,904
Dennis M. Love		48		157,452		2,575		160,075
Milford W. McGuirt		45,073		99,927		1,834		146,834
Clarence H. Smith		57,573		99,927		1,904		159,404
Clyde C. Tuggle		45,073		99,927		1,904		146,904
E. Jenner Wood III		57,573		99,927		1,904		159,404

Name
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash($) Stock
Awards
($)⁽¹⁾ All Other
Compensation
($)⁽²⁾ Total
($)
Helen Ballard
40,081 54,919 658 95,658
Thomas C. Gallagher
41,331 54,919 658 96,908
George C. Guynn
55,081 54,919 658 110,658
John R. Holder
12,586 84,914 879 98,379
J. Hicks Lanier⁽³⁾
12,500 — 187 12,687
J. Reese Lanier
37,581 54,919 658 93,158
Dennis M. Love
12,586 84,914 879 98,379
Clarence H. Smith
55,081 54,919 658 110,658
Clyde C. Tuggle
40,081 54,919 658 95,658
E. Jenner Wood III
42,581 54,919 658 98,158

(1): ~~The values for stock awards in this column represent~~

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock granted in fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic ~~718; however, pursuant to SEC regulations, no reduction has been applied for estimated forfeitures.~~718. Information about the assumptions used to value these awards can be found under the ~~captions "Equity Compensation" and "Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan"~~ caption “Equity Compensation” in Notes 1 and ~~7, respectively,~~8 in our ~~Fiscal 2015~~2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of January ~~30, 2016,~~29, 2022, Mr. Holder ~~and Mr. Love each~~ held ~~714~~1,125 restricted shares of our common ~~stock, while~~stock; Mr. Love held 1,156 restricted shares of our common stock; and each of our other non-employee directors ~~(with the exception of Mr. J. Hicks Lanier, who retired in June 2015)~~ held ~~628~~1,011 restricted shares of our common stock.

(2)

~~(2)~~

Represents the dollar value of dividends paid on unvested stock awards which was not factored into the grant date fair value for the stock.

(3)

In addition, from time to time, our directors receive discounted and complimentary meals, apparel and related merchandise. We do not believe that the aggregate incremental cost to us of these discounts and benefits exceeds $10,000 for any of our directors and, in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, have excluded them from this table.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Table of Contents~~

~~(3)~~: Among his many years of service to our company, Mr. J. Hicks Lanier served as the Chairman of our Board from 1981 until his retirement from our Board following the conclusion of our 2015 annual meeting on June 17, 2015. Accordingly, compensation paid to Mr. Lanier during fiscal 2015 is included in this table. In connection with Mr. Lanier's retirement, we previously entered into an arrangement with Mr. Lanier providing him certain limited office, secretarial and related support services. The aggregate value of these benefits did not exceed $10,000 during fiscal 2015 and, in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, have been excluded from this table.

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

To reinforce the alignment of the interests of our directors with the long-term interests of our shareholders, our Board has established stock ownership guidelines applicable to our non-employee directors. Under these guidelines, each of our non-employee directors is expected within four years to accumulate and hold shares of our common stock having a fair market value equal to 2.0x the ~~director's~~director’s annual retainer. ~~Our non-employee directors have four years from their appointment to meet their ownership guideline requirement.~~ Each of our ~~current non-employee~~ directors has either met or is on track to meet his/her ownership ~~guideline.~~

~~In addition, our~~guideline within the requisite time frame.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide for a retention guideline, or holding period, of one year for stock acquired upon the ~~exercise of options or~~ lapse of restrictions on restricted stock (net of funds reasonably expected to be necessary to satisfy applicable ~~taxes and/or pay the exercise price of stock options)~~taxes) that applies to our non-employee directors.

22 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

~~Table of Contents~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

All of our executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of our Board. The following table sets forth information, as of April 14, 2022, about our executive officers, aswith the exception of ~~April 15, 2016:~~

~~Name~~

~~Age~~

~~Title~~

~~Biography~~

~~Thomas C. Chubb III~~

our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President Mr. Chubb, whose biographical information is provided above under “Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Directors—Continuing Directors” on page 15:

Name

Age

Title

Biography

Thomas E. Campbell

Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Mr. Campbell is Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer and ~~President~~

was named to that position in 2021. Previously, Mr. ~~Chubb is our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. He has~~Campbell served ~~as our Chief Executive Officer and President since 2013 and was elected our Chairman in 2015. Mr. Chubb served as our President starting in 2009,~~ as our Executive Vice ~~President~~President-People & Technology from ~~2004~~2019 until ~~2009, and as our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 1999 to 2004.~~

~~Thomas E. Campbell~~

~~Executive Vice President-Law and Administration, General Counsel and Secretary~~

~~Mr. Campbell is~~2021; Executive Vice President-Law and Administration, General Counsel and Secretary ~~and has held that position since 2014. Prior~~from 2014 to ~~his promotion in 2014, Mr. Campbell served as our~~2019; Senior Vice President-Law and Administration, General Counsel and Secretary from 2011 to 2014; ~~as our~~ Senior Vice President-Law, General Counsel and Secretary from 2008 to 2011; and ~~as our~~ Vice President-Law, General Counsel and Secretary from 2006 to 2008.

K. Scott Grassmyer

Executive Vice ~~President-Finance,~~President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Grassmyer is Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and ~~Controller~~

Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Grassmyer iswas promoted to the additional role of Chief Operating Officer in March 2022 and has served in the capacity of Chief Financial Officer, including as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, ~~and has served in this capacity~~ since 2014. ~~Prior to his promotion in 2014,~~Previously, Mr. Grassmyer served as ~~our~~ Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Controller from 2011 to 2014; ~~as our~~ Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller from 2008 to 2011; ~~and as our~~ Senior Vice President and Controller from 2004 to ~~2008. From 2003 to 2004, he served as our~~2008; Vice President and ~~Controller. Mr. Grassmyer was appointed our~~ Controller ~~in 2002.~~from 2003 to 2004; and Controller from 2002 to 2003.

Michelle M. Kelly

Chief Executive Officer,
~~J. Wesley Howard, Jr.~~Lilly Pulitzer

~~President, Lanier Apparel~~

~~Mr. Howard~~Ms. Kelly is ~~President, Lanier Apparel~~Chief Executive Officer, Lilly Pulitzer (one of our operating ~~groups, previously referred to as Lanier Clothes)~~groups) and has held that position since 2011. Since becoming President, Lanier Slates for Lanier Clothes in 1997, Mr. Howard has served in various capacities for Lanier Clothes, including as President, Special Programs from 2005 to 2010; as President, Brands and Special Programs during a portion of 2010; and as President, Sales and Merchandising during a portion of 2011.

~~Michelle M. Kelly~~

~~CEO, Lilly Pulitzer Group~~

~~Ms. Kelly is Chief Executive Officer of our Lilly Pulitzer Group and has held that position since April~~ 2016. She served as President of Lilly Pulitzer from ~~March~~ 2015 until her promotion in ~~April~~ 2016. ~~She~~Ms. Kelly has worked for ~~our~~ Lilly Pulitzer ~~Group~~ for more than 1015 years and prior to her promotion in 2015, ~~she~~ served as Executive Vice President, Brand Distribution, Marketing & Merchandising from 2014 to 2015; as Senior Vice President, Brand Distribution, Marketing & Merchandising from 2013 to 2014; as Senior Vice President, Merchandising, Marketing and Retail from 2010 to 2013; and as Vice President, eCommerce, Online Marketing & Stores in 2010.

Suraj A. Palakshappa

Senior Vice President,
General Counsel, Treasurer and Secretary

Mr. Palakshappa is Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer and Secretary. Mr. Palakshappa was named Treasurer in March 2022 and has served as our General Counsel and Secretary, including as our Vice President-Law, General Counsel and Secretary, since 2019. Prior to being named General Counsel, Mr. Palakshappa served as our Vice President-Law, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from 2015 until 2019. Mr. Palakshappa has been a member of our legal department since 2006.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Name			Age			Title			Biography
	Douglas B. Wood		51	57	~~CEO,~~		Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Bahama ~~Group~~			Mr. Wood is Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Bahama (one of our ~~Tommy Bahama Group~~operating groups) and has held that position since ~~January~~ 2016. Prior to his promotion in 2016, heMr. Wood served as Tommy ~~Bahama's~~Bahama’s President and Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2016 and as its Chief Operating Officer from 2001 to 2008.

In addition to the above, Mr. Scott A. Beaumont served as CEO, Lilly Pulitzer Group until his retirement in April 2016; Mr. Mark Maidment served as CEO, Ben Sherman Group until his departure from our company in July 2015 when we sold the assets and operations of our former Ben Sherman Group; and Mr. Terry R. Pillow served as CEO, Tommy Bahama Group until his retirement in January 2016.

24 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

~~Table of Contents~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Introduction

~~Introduction~~

In this section of the proxy statement, we provide information about our executive compensation program specifically as it relates to our ~~"named~~“named executive officers,"” or NEOs. This information includes: (1) a Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) discussing, among other things, how and why our NC&G Committee (which we refer to in this section of the proxy statement as our ~~"compensation committee"~~“compensation committee”) made its fiscal ~~2015~~2021 compensation decisions for our ~~NEOs;~~NEOs in Spring 2021; (2) the compensation tables required by the ~~SEC's~~SEC’s rules and regulations; ~~and~~ (3) a summary of certain limited arrangements with our NEOs that provide for payments upon defined change of control events or upon termination of ~~employment.~~

employment; and (4) disclosure of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to that of our median compensated employee, as required by and determined in accordance with the SEC’s rules.

The CD&A primarily focuses on our 2021 compensation programs, actions and outputs. As described further in the CD&A, in making its fiscal 2021 compensation decisions in early fiscal 2021, our compensation committee engaged in thoughtful dialogue with our management and carefully reviewed our executive compensation programs to ensure that realized compensation outcomes strongly align with our company’s performance and our shareholders’ interests, including consideration of the challenges to our business presented by the COVID-19 pandemic and anticipated continued impacts on the retail apparel industry at that time.

Under the SEC’s rules, our NEOs for purposes of this proxy statement consist of our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving at the end of fiscal 2021. For fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, our NEOs ~~are~~were as follows:

•

Mr. Thomas C. Chubb III, ~~our~~ Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and ~~President;~~President (our principal executive officer);

•

Mr. K. Scott Grassmyer, ~~our~~ Executive Vice ~~President-Finance,~~President, Chief Financial Officer and ~~Controller;~~Chief Operating Officer (our principal financial officer);

•

~~Mr. Scott A. Beaumont~~~~, retired CEO, Lilly Pulitzer Group;~~

•

Mr. Thomas E. Campbell, ~~our~~ Executive Vice ~~President-Law~~President and ~~Administration, General Counsel and Secretary;~~Chief Information Officer;

•

~~Mr. Mark Maidment~~Ms. Michelle M. Kelly, ~~former CEO, Ben Sherman Group;~~Chief Executive Officer, Lilly Pulitzer; and

•

Mr. ~~Terry R. Pillow~~Douglas B. Wood, ~~retired CEO,~~Chief Executive Officer, Tommy ~~Bahama Group.~~Bahama.

Because Mr. Maidment first became an NEO in fiscal 2015, in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, we have not included his compensation information for periods prior to when he became an NEO. In addition, compensation paid to Mr. Maidment was denominated in pounds sterling; in this proxy statement, except as otherwise indicated, for ease of reference the compensation paid to Mr. Maidment during or in respect of fiscal 2015 has been restated to U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of pounds sterling 1.00 = U.S. $1.52. The exchange rate used to restate compensation paid to Mr. Maidment represents the average month-end exchange rate during the applicable fiscal year that was used for financial reporting purposes.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

We are a ~~global~~leading branded apparel company that designs, sources, markets and distributes products bearing the trademarks of our ~~owned~~ Tommy ~~Bahama®~~Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Southern Tide, The Beaufort Bonnet Company and Duck Head lifestyle brands. Tommy Bahama and Lilly ~~Pulitzer® lifestyle brands, as well as certain licensed and private label apparel products. We distribute our owned lifestyle branded products through our direct to consumer channel, consisting~~Pulitzer, in the aggregate, represent more than 90% of our retail stores and e-commerce sites, and our wholesale distribution channel. Our direct to consumer operations provide us with the opportunity to interact directly with our customers, present to them the full line of our current season products and provide an opportunity for consumers to be immersed in the theme of the lifestyle brand.net sales. During ~~Fiscal 2015, 91%~~fiscal 2021, 80% of our net sales were ~~from products bearing brands that we own,~~through our direct-to-consumer channels of distribution and ~~66%~~97% of our consolidated net sales were ~~sales of our products through our direct~~ to ~~consumer channels of distribution.~~

customers located in the United States.

Our business strategy is to develop and market compelling lifestyle brands and products that evoke a strong emotional response from our target consumers. We consider ~~"lifestyle"~~lifestyle brands to be those brands that have a clearly defined and targeted point of view inspired by an appealing lifestyle or attitude. Furthermore, we believe ~~that~~ lifestyle brands ~~like Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer,~~ that create an emotional connection ~~with consumers,~~ can command greater loyalty and higher price points at retail and create licensing ~~opportunities, which may result~~opportunities. We believe the attraction of a lifestyle brand depends on creating compelling product, effectively communicating the respective lifestyle brand message and distributing products to consumers where and when they want them.

Fiscal 2021 Overview and Highlights

While the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic continued to impact our operations in ~~higher earnings. In executing~~fiscal 2021, including supply chain disruptions, freight delivery issues and ongoing governmental restrictions affecting our ~~objectives,~~retail and food and beverage locations, the economic environment improved significantly during the year. Excellent execution at each of our operating groups allowed our company to capitalize on exceptionally strong consumer demand to achieve record performance in each of our brands and record net earnings as a company. Our compensation committee made decisions with respect to executive officer compensation early in fiscal 2021, largely in advance of visibility into the rebound in consumer demand for our products, and set what we ~~strive to develop businesses that can drive sustained profitable growth~~believed were meaningful performance goals consistent with our outlook and ~~enhance long-term shareholder value. In furtherance of advancing~~the challenges facing our business ~~objectives,~~at that time. As part of its decision making process, our compensation committee took into consideration market practice and retention considerations in ~~April 2016,~~light of measures taken to preserve liquidity during fiscal 2020, including base salary reductions and suspension of our annual incentive compensation program. Despite significant uncertainty at the start of fiscal 2021, each of our brands ultimately achieved strong growth, not only compared to fiscal 2020, but also as compared to pre-pandemic fiscal 2019 levels, including full-price e-commerce growth, strong full-price sales in our retail stores and growth in our Tommy Bahama

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

food and beverage business. This success builds on decisions we ~~acquired~~made during fiscal 2020 and prior to the ~~Southern Tide® lifestyle brand.~~

~~Overall,~~COVID-19 pandemic, including maintaining our focus on long-term strategic initiatives such as our initiative to improve the profitability of our Tommy Bahama business and investments in technology across the enterprise. We believe that our remarkable performance in fiscal 2021 is due in large part to our talented, highly engaged and motivated teams, who we believe ~~that fiscal 2015 was a good year for~~will continue to be key to our ~~company,~~success in spite of a challenging retail climate that saw significant declines in retail consumer traffic in traditional brick and mortar retail locations, and believe that the compensation and other actions affecting our NEOs were in keeping with our performance. Notably:

•: ~~for fiscal 2015, consolidated net sales rose 5%~~delivering long-term value to ~~$969.3 million from $920.3 million in fiscal 2014;~~shareholders.
•: ~~in fiscal 2015, Tommy Bahama's net sales increased 5% to $658.5 million, with a comparable store sales increase of 3%;~~

~~Table of Contents~~

•: Lilly Pulitzer experienced a stellar year, with a net sales increase of 22% in fiscal 2015 to $204.6 million reflecting a remarkable comparable store sales increase of 27%, and widespread consumer acceptance of Lilly Pulitzer's resort chic brand message; and
•: strategically, in the second fiscal quarter of fiscal 2015, we sold the operations of our former Ben Sherman operating group, which experienced a $10.8 million operating loss in fiscal 2014, for £40.8 million (or $63.7 million).

Our focus is to deliver long-term shareholder value. To that end, based on our $68.96 per share stock price at the end of fiscal 2015, we have delivered one-year and three-year total shareholder returns of 27% and 46%, respectively.

Consideration of Last ~~Year's~~Year’s Advisory ~~Shareholder Vote on NEO Compensation~~

Say-On-Pay Votes

At our ~~2015~~2021 annual meeting, ~~of shareholders,~~ we held an advisory vote seeking shareholder approval of a ~~"say-on-pay"~~“say-on-pay” proposal approving our NEO compensation program. At the ~~2015~~2021 annual meeting, over ~~99%~~99.7% of the votes cast on our say-on-pay proposal were ~~cast~~ in support of our NEO compensation program, as described in our ~~2015~~2021 proxy statement. ~~In light~~Our compensation committee values the input of our shareholders, and to the ~~overwhelming shareholder support on last year's~~extent there is any significant vote against the say-on-pay proposal, it will consider our ~~compensation committee has continued~~shareholders’ concerns and evaluate whether any actions are appropriate to ~~apply the same principles and general compensation programs for fiscal 2015. However, our~~address those concerns. Our compensation committee regularly evaluates market compensation practices, taking into consideration information relating to compensation paid by peers, and ~~information furnished by management and compensation consultants, and~~ implements changes as it deems appropriate.

The compensation committee invites our shareholders to communicate any concerns or opinions on executive pay directly to our Board of Directors. Please refer to “Additional Information—Communications to our Board of Directors” for information about communicating with our Board.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation programs are designed to:

•

maintain a strong link between pay and performance;

•

align our ~~executive officers'~~NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders; and

•

ensure that we are able to attract and retain talented individuals.

Consistent with these objectives, our NEO compensation practices ~~incorporate~~in recent years have factored in the following, which we believe are in ~~consideration of~~ the long-term best interests of our shareholders:

•: ~~we tie a meaningful percentage of each NEO's potential cash and total compensation opportunities to performance of our company and/or our operating groups;~~
•: ~~we do not provide our NEOs with tax gross-ups;~~
•: ~~our equity compensation awards are subject to a "double trigger" acceleration of vesting;~~
•: ~~we maintain a stand-alone recoupment or "clawback" policy with respect to incentive-based cash and equity compensation for our executive officers;~~
•: ~~we do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on performance-based equity compensation awards during the applicable performance period;~~
•: ~~repricing of stock options is prohibited under our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (which we refer to as the "LTIP") absent shareholder approval;~~
•: ~~we maintain stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers;~~
•: ~~we have a retention guideline, or holding period, on exercised stock options and vested restricted stock that applies to our executive officers;~~
•: ~~we have an anti-hedging policy prohibiting our directors and executive officers from hedging the economic risk of ownership of our company's stock;~~
•: ~~we have a formal anti-pledging restriction applicable to our directors and executive officers; and~~
•: ~~we generally provide only modest perquisites, namely complimentary or discounted availability of our products, that serve the best interests of our business and are common practice in our industry.~~

What We Do		What We Don’t Do
	We tie a significant percentage of each NEO’s potential total compensation opportunities to performance of our company and/or our operating groups		We do not have employment or severance agreements with our NEOs
	We provide a mix of short-term and long-term incentives with rigorous financial and non-financial performance requirements		We do not provide our NEOs with incentives that encourage excessive risk-taking
	Our equity compensation awards generally contain only a “double trigger” change in control acceleration of vesting		We do not provide our NEOs with excise or other tax gross ups
	We maintain a robust stand-alone recoupment or “clawback” policy for incentive-based cash and equity compensation paid to our NEOs		We do not permit the repricing or cash buyouts of stock options or SARs without shareholder approval
	Compensation decisions for NEOs are made by an independent compensation committee advised by an independent compensation consultant, with benchmarking against a thoughtfully assembled and representative peer group		We do not permit liberal share recycling or “net share counting” on equity awards
	We condition severance payments upon a release of claims		We do not permit our directors and executive officers to hedge the economic risk of ownership of our company’s stock
	We have meaningful stock ownership requirements for executives and retention guidelines, or holding periods, on exercised stock options and vested restricted stock that apply to our NEOs		We do not permit our directors and executive officers to pledge their interests in our company’s stock as a form of security
	We have an annual say-on-pay vote		We do not provide guaranteed incentive awards for executives
	We provide only modest perquisites, namely complimentary or discounted availability of our products, that serve the best interests of our business and are common practice in our industry		We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on performance-based equity awards during the applicable performance period

26 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Table of Contents~~

Compensation Decision Process

~~Compensation Committee;~~ Compensation Consultants. Pursuant to its charter, our compensation committee has the authority, with our ~~company's~~company’s funding, to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant to assist in the ~~evaluation~~performance of ~~among other things, chief executive officer and non-CEO executive officer compensation,~~its responsibilities, provided, that, it will retain such an advisor only after taking into consideration relevant factors relating to the ~~advisor's~~advisor’s independence from our management.

~~During fiscal 2015, our~~

Our compensation committee again retained Mercer (US) Inc. ~~("Mercer")~~ as its compensation consultant during fiscal 2021 to assist and advise with various executive compensation matters, including ~~proposals for~~ the total compensation paid to our executive officers ~~and~~relative to market data, the individual components of executive officer compensation and ~~market data, including~~ the peer group used ~~by management~~ in reviewing and formulating executive officer compensation and ~~influencing~~changes to our ~~Chief Executive Officer's recommendations~~executive compensation programs in response to the ~~compensation committee on compensation paid to our other NEOs for fiscal 2015.~~

COVID-19 pandemic.

In relation to our compensation ~~committee's~~committee’s retention of Mercer, our compensation committee considered various factors relating to ~~the advisor's~~Mercer’s independence, ~~from our management,~~ including those enumerated by the NYSE. As part of its evaluation, our compensation committee considered the following: ~~Mercer's~~Mercer’s parent company, ~~provides certain~~Marsh & McLennan Companies, and affiliates provide insurance and benefits brokerage services to our company; the fees paid to ~~Mercer's parent company~~Marsh & McLennan (including Mercer) in connection with those brokerage services represented a nominal amount of the revenues generated by that ~~entity; Mercer's~~company; Mercer’s policies and procedures relating to conflicts of interest; the fact that the Mercer consultants that work with our company do not ~~presently~~ own any of our common stock; and certain ~~present~~consulting services provided by Mercer to current and ~~historic business relationships between Mercer or its affiliates, on the one hand, and~~former employers of certain of our compensation committee members. Following its review, our compensation committee concluded that Mercer was ~~independent~~independent.

Roles of Compensation Committee and ~~that the engagement of Mercer did not raise a conflict of interest.~~

In addition, during fiscal 2013, our company's management retained Towers Watson to evaluate the short-term cash incentive programs throughout our company. Although the engagement was not focused on or specific to executive compensation, certain observations and recommendations by Towers Watson influenced certain management recommendations to, and decisions by, our compensation committee in respect of fiscal 2015.

~~Key Participant Roles.~~Independent Compensation Consultant. The following table summarizes the ~~significant~~respective roles of ~~the various key participants, including those of certain of~~ our ~~executive officers,~~compensation committee and its compensation consultant in the decision-making process with respect to NEO compensation, in particular for fiscal ~~2015:~~2021:

~~Participant~~		~~Roles~~
	Participant
~~Board of Directors~~		• Reviews and approves changes in equity and cash incentive plans available to our NEOs (other than those generally available to employees of our company on a non-discriminatory basis), including submission of plans to our shareholders for approval as may be required • ~~Appoints the members of our compensation committee~~ Roles
	Compensation Committee		• Establishes and communicates the performance objectives for our Chief Executive Officer • Evaluates the performance of our Chief Executive Officer • Determines and approves the base salary and cash incentive award opportunities for our Chief Executive Officer • Reviews our Chief Executive ~~Officer's~~Officer’s compensation recommendations for, and performance evaluation ~~and compensation recommendations for~~of, each of our other NEOs • Approves the base salary and cash incentive award opportunities for each of our other NEOs • Reviews and approves all equity compensation awards, including those to our NEOs • Oversees our ~~company's~~company’s risk profile that results from our compensation programs • Engages a compensation consultant, as it deems appropriate, to assist the committee
~~Committee's~~	Committee’s Compensation Consultant		• ~~Reviewed~~ Reviews compensation programs and recommendations for total and component compensation for our NEOs relative to market comparables • Reviews and ~~made recommendations for fiscal 2015 total and component NEO compensation~~ • ~~Reviewed and provided~~provides recommendations for peer group composition ~~for fiscal 2015~~ • ~~Provided~~ Reviews and provides recommendations for program design for equity compensation programs and cash incentive plans for our NEOs

~~Table of Contents~~

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS Roles of Executive Officers. Our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President reviews performance of our other executive officers, provides our compensation committee with base salary and target cash and equity incentive compensation recommendations for our other executive officers (without making recommendations with respect to his own compensation) and, together with our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer and other executive officers, recommends performance goals applicable to performance-based compensation. During fiscal 2021, our Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer and our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer and Secretary attended portions of our compensation committee meetings, at the invitation of the committee, assisted with the design and implementation of our compensation programs, including equity compensation programs, and reviewed and provided guidance on market data on executive officer compensation and key legal and corporate governance developments relating to compensation practices. ~~Participant~~		~~Roles~~

~~Executive Officers~~
~~Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President~~		• ~~Regularly attends portions of our compensation committee meetings, at the invitation of the committee~~ • ~~Reviews performance of our other NEOs~~ • ~~Provides our compensation committee with base salary and target cash and equity incentive compensation recommendations for our other executive officers~~ • ~~Together with our Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers, recommends performance goals applicable to performance-based compensation~~
~~Executive Vice President—Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Controller~~		• ~~Regularly attends portions of our compensation committee meetings, at the invitation of the committee~~ • Provides budget information and preliminary recommendations to our Chief Executive Officer and, ultimately, to our compensation committee on performance goals applicable to performance-based compensation • ~~Provides and certifies financial information used in determining satisfaction of performance targets~~ • ~~Assists with design and implementation of compensation programs, including equity compensation programs~~
~~Executive Vice President—Law and Administration, Secretary and General Counsel~~		• ~~Regularly attends portions of our compensation committee meetings, at the invitation of the committee~~ • ~~Prepares and provides agenda materials for our compensation committee meetings~~ • ~~Oversees review of market data on executive officer compensation, including applicable ranges of base salary and total cash compensation paid to comparable executives at comparator companies~~ • ~~Assists with design and implementation of compensation programs, including equity compensation programs~~ • ~~Updates and summarizes key legal and corporate governance developments relating to compensation practices~~

Market Data. We utilize market surveys to obtain a general understanding of compensation practices and trends, and in evaluating market comparisons of compensation paid to our NEOs when making compensation recommendations and decisions for our NEOs. For fiscal ~~2015~~2021 compensation reviews, we utilized the applicable ~~Kenexa~~IPAS Global Consumer Goods ~~Surveys; Mercer's Apparel and Retail Industry~~Survey; Mercer’s Executive Remuneration Surveys; and Willis Towers ~~Watson's~~Watson’s General Industry and Retail/Wholesale ~~Industry~~ Survey Reports on Executive Compensation. We do not have any input into the companies that make up these surveys.

In addition, our compensation committee reviews compensation data obtained from publicly available sources for peer ~~or comparator,~~ companies. For fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, our compensation committee reviewed relevant compensation data from the following companies:


~~Ann~~ The Buckle, Inc. ~~bebe stores, inc.~~Carter’s, Inc. ~~Carter's, Inc.~~The CATO Corporation ~~Chico's~~Chico’s FAS, Inc. ~~Children's~~The Children’s Place, Inc. Columbia Sportswear Company			Crocs, Inc. Deckers Outdoor Corporation Delta Apparel, Inc. G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. Guess?, Inc. ~~Kate Spade & Co.~~ J.Jill, Inc.			lululemon athletica inc.		~~Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.~~ ~~New York & Company, Inc.~~ ~~Perry Ellis International, Inc.~~ ~~Quiksilver, Inc.~~ Steven Madden, Ltd. Urban Outfitters, Inc. Vera Bradley, Inc. Zumiez Inc.

At Mercer’s recommendation, Zumiez Inc. was added to our peer company group for fiscal 2021 based on its revenue size and business offerings. RTW Retailwinds, Inc. was removed from our peer company group for fiscal 2021 following its bankruptcy.

~~Table of Contents~~

Elements of Executive Officer Compensation

Total compensation for our NEOs in recent years has generally consisted of the following ~~components:~~

elements:

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223445d1-fc_compensr4c.jpg]

In evaluating and approving our fiscal 2021 executive officer compensation program in March 2021 and May 2021, our compensation committee reviewed actions taken in fiscal 2020 to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and carefully reassessed each element of the program in light of our compensation philosophy and objectives, our company’s performance, retention considerations and the current economic environment and conditions in the retail apparel industry. The following table summarizes each component of our executive compensation program and key actions taken with respect to that component in fiscal 2021.

28 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Compensation Component~~		~~Overview~~		~~Purpose~~
	Compensation Component			Purpose			Actions Taken in Fiscal 2021
~~Base Salary~~		Base ~~salary provides a fixed amount of cash compensation to our NEOs.~~Salary			Base salary provides a competitive level of guaranteed cash compensation that allows us to attract and retain qualified executives and to compensate them for performing basic job responsibilities.			We restored base salaries to pre-COVID-19 levels and increased base salaries for certain of our NEOs.
	Short-Term/Annual Incentive Compensation ~~and Long-Term Cash Incentive Compensation~~			Cash incentive awards ~~including under the EPIP,~~ provide our NEOs with variable cash compensation opportunities based on company and/or operating group performance ~~or achievement of other strategic goals.~~		~~Cash incentive awards~~and are used, among other things, to attract and retain qualified executives; align the compensation paid to our executive officers with our ~~company's~~company’s performance; and motivate our executive officers to work to achieve and exceed specific company performance ~~goals or other strategic goals;~~goals.			We reinstated our short-term incentive compensation program with target awards based on the performance of our company as a whole and ~~where appropriate, facilitate~~our Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer operating groups during the ~~treatment~~first half of ~~elements of compensation as performance-based compensation under~~fiscal 2021 and, separately, the ~~Internal Revenue Code.~~full 2021 fiscal year.
	Long-Term Equity Compensation ~~(Both~~(both performance-vesting and time-vesting)			Long-term equity compensation awards provide our NEOs with equity compensation opportunities under our LTIP based on company performance and/or the satisfaction of multi-year service ~~requirements.~~		~~Equity compensation~~requirements, which further aligns the interests of our ~~NEOs~~executives with those of our shareholders by encouraging retention, motivating our executive officers to work to achieve and exceed performance goals and rewarding increases in stock price.			We continued our recent practice of issuing both time-based awards and performance-based awards, including issuing performance-based awards based on total shareholder return relative to peer companies in our industry over a three-year period.
~~Other Benefit Plan Participation Opportunities~~	Benefits and Modest Perquisites			Our NEOs ~~based in the United States~~ are generally eligible to participate in various health, life insurance, retirement, stock purchase, disability and ~~disability benefit~~merchandise discount plans we have established for ~~our U.S.-based~~other employees and/or executives.		These benefit plans and perquisites are designed to attract and retain key employees by providing benefits competitive with those generally available.
		~~Mr. Maidment, as~~	We reinstated a ~~U.K.-based executive officer,~~company match under our 401(k) retirement savings plan, which was ~~eligible~~suspended during the 2020 calendar year in response to participate in our Ben Sherman Group Personal Pension Scheme, our Ben Sherman private medical insurance plan, our Ben Sherman Income Protection Scheme and various other health and life insurance benefit plans we previously established for our U.K.-based employees.
~~Special Transaction Success Bonus Opportunities~~		In furtherance of ensuring a successful sale of our former Ben Sherman Group, we entered into a one-time Incentive and Settlement Agreement payable in connection with or following a sale and transitionthe impact of the ~~Ben Sherman Group's operations.~~COVID-19 pandemic.		Special success bonuses incent key executives to remain with the operations as we pursue and effectuate a strategic transaction to dispose of one of our businesses, and further align the interests of our company and the affected NEO with those of prospective acquirors.
~~Perquisites~~		From time to time, our NEOs receive discounts on merchandise purchased directly from our distribution centers or through our direct to consumer channels, as well as complimentary meals at our Tommy Bahama restaurants or allowances for apparel merchandise, and other minimal perquisites.		~~These perquisites are designed to attract and retain key employees by providing perquisites that are common practice within our industry.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Target Compensation ~~Levels / Mix.~~Levels. In establishing specific base salary amounts and cash incentive award target amounts payable to any individual NEO, our compensation committee takes into consideration a number of factors, such as the individual’s specific role, the individual’s performance and accomplishment of significant business strategies, the size of the individual’s operating group or business unit, the oversight and other responsibilities of the individual, the individual’s employment experience, the individual’s compensation history at our company, other factors related to the scope or unique nature of the position’s responsibilities and retention considerations. In recent years, our compensation committee has also generally utilized the median of total cash compensation (base salary and cash incentive awards) for similar positions identified using industry and general market data, as well as that of similarly situated executives at the peer company group, as a guideline for evaluating and approving the target total cash compensation for our executive officers generally. In establishing specific base salary amounts and cash incentive award target amounts payable to any individual executive officer, our compensation committee takes into consideration a number of factors, such as the specific individual's duration with our company and in a specific role, prior performance and accomplishment of significant business strategies, the size of an operating group or business unit, the oversight and other responsibilities of the individual, the individual's prior employment experience and compensation history, other factors related to the scope or unique nature of the incumbent's job responsibilities, retention considerations, and geographic distinctions. For reference, total target cash compensation approved by our compensation committee for our Chief Executive Officer for fiscal 2015 was below the median of industry and general market data studied by our compensation committee.NEOs.

In approving the amount of long-term equity compensation granted to our ~~executive officers,~~NEOs, our compensation committee reviews market data to understand trends and general compensation practices (for example, typical vesting periods, ~~and/or~~ types and values of equity ~~grants). In approving our fiscal 2015~~grants, the mix of guaranteed and performance-based compensation and/or the mix of cash and equity ~~compensation program, which is described under~~compensation).

Compensation Mix.~~"—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation, "~~ ~~our compensation committee also took into consideration market survey data on equity compensation ranges and recommendations made by the compensation consultant engaged by our compensation committee.~~

Our compensation committee reviews all components of the compensation payable to our ~~executive officers,~~NEOs, including base salaries, cash incentive awards and long-term equity compensation. In approving the total target compensation of our NEOs, our compensation committee does not expressly allocate a specified percentage of total compensation to base salary, short-term incentive compensation and/or long-term equity compensation.

~~Compensation Mix.~~ Our compensation committee generally increases target incentive award levels for an ~~executive officer~~NEO as such ~~officer's~~officer’s responsibilities within our organization increase, thereby more heavily weighting the ~~variable~~performance-based elements of compensation for our most senior ~~executive officers~~executives who are more likely to have a strong and direct impact in achieving strategic and financial goals that are most likely to affect shareholder value. Our compensation committee believes that the best interests of our shareholders are served by tying pay to performance and subjecting a meaningful proportion of our ~~NEOs'~~NEOs’ total compensation to the achievement of company and/or operating group ~~performance that benefits~~goals. Consistent with this philosophy, and after assessing market practices, our ~~company~~compensation committee has focused in recent years on increasing performance-based compensation elements as a percentage of the total target compensation for

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mr. Chubb and ~~shareholders. As illustrated below, a significant portion~~our other NEOs. When approving the total target compensation of our ~~NEOs'~~NEOs, our compensation committee takes into consideration the allocation of the total compensation to base salary, short-term incentive compensation and long-term equity compensation.

We have four primary elements of direct compensation for our NEOs, which are described in further detail below: base salary; short-term/annual (cash) incentive compensation; performance-based long-term equity awards with specified service requirements; and service-based long-term equity awards. The charts below illustrate the proportion of the total target direct compensation ~~for fiscal 2015 was performance based.~~


~~CEO~~		~~Other~~of our CEO and of our other NEOs

~~The information in the chart above for Other NEOs excludes (1) compensation approved for Mr. Maidment,~~ as a ~~significant portion of Mr. Maidment's fiscal 2015~~group which is “at risk” compensation ~~was~~ tied to ~~the successful sale of~~ our former Ben Sherman Group, and (2) cash long-term incentive compensation specifically approved for Mr. Beaumont during fiscal 2014 in anticipation of his pending retirement, all of which are described under~~"—Other Special Incentives."~~

company’s performance:

Base Salary

Our compensation committee utilizes base salaries to provide a fixed amount of compensation to our NEOs for the performance of their duties. Base salaries of our NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis. Our compensation committee determines the salary of our Chief Executive Officer and reviews and approves (with or without modification) our Chief Executive ~~Officer's~~Officer’s recommended salaries for our other executive officers.

~~Table of Contents~~

Base Salaries for Fiscal ~~2015~~

2021

~~Chief Executive Officer's Review.~~In ~~March 2016,~~April 2020, as part of an effort to preserve liquidity in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our compensation committee ~~evaluated~~approved voluntary reductions in the base salary of Mr. ~~Chubb's performance during fiscal 2015. As part~~Chubb, Mr. Grassmyer, Mr. Wood and Mr. Campbell for all or a portion of ~~its review, our compensation committee considered~~ the ~~company's performance and achievements during fiscal 2015, including in particular:~~

•: ~~the successful sale of our former Ben Sherman Group for a transaction price approaching $64 million;~~
•: successful implementation of executive succession plans at our key Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer operating groups, with Mr. Douglas B. Wood being promoted to CEO, Tommy Bahama Group at the beginningremainder of fiscal ~~2016 and Ms. Michelle M. Kelly being promoted to CEO, Lilly Pulitzer Group in April 2016 when their respective predecessors retired;~~
•: ~~increased top- and bottom-line performance for the company on a consolidated basis, despite an overwhelmingly challenging consumer retail environment; and~~
•: ~~execution and/or progress with respect to several other strategic initiatives for our organization.~~

~~Base Salaries for our NEOs~~

~~Following~~2020. In March 2021, following a review of ~~relevant market data with respect to each of our NEOs, individual performance and contributions to our company and~~ the financial performance of our company and various business units, which included consideration of the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the successful measures taken to preserve liquidity during fiscal 2020, our compensation committee determined that it was appropriate to restore the base salary of Mr. Chubb and Mr. Wood to their pre-pandemic levels. In addition, our compensation committee approved an increase of 3% in the ~~following merit-based increases~~base salaries of Mr. Grassmyer and Mr. Campbell, from $425,000 to $437,750, which our compensation committee believed was appropriate in ~~base salary (effective April 2015):~~

Base Salary

Percentage
Change
Name
Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2014
Thomas C. Chubb III
$ 800,000 $ 775,000 3.2 %
K. Scott Grassmyer
$ 385,000 $ 360,000 6.9 %
Scott A. Beaumont
$ 600,000 $ 550,000 9.1 %
Thomas E. Campbell
$ 385,000 $ 360,000 6.9 %
Mark Maidment
$ 319,200 $ 304,000 5.0 %
Terry R. Pillow
$ 875,000 $ 850,000 2.9 %

~~Short-Term Incentive Compensation~~

light of the contributions by Mr. Grassmyer and Mr. Campbell in developing and implementing strategic initiatives to position our company to successfully navigate the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and better position us for long-term success. Our compensation committee ~~utilizes~~also approved an increase in Ms. Kelly’s base salary of approximately 3.1%, from $567,250 to $585,000, in light of continued exceptional performance by Lilly Pulitzer.

Short-Term/Annual (Cash) Incentive Compensation

Our compensation committee has utilized cash incentive awards ~~under the EPIP~~in recent years to provide our NEOs with variable cash compensation opportunities based on company and/or operating group performance.

~~For fiscal 2015,~~

In March 2020, our compensation committee ~~approved~~suspended our annual cash incentive awards program for fiscal 2020 in response to the uncertain impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. In March 2021, after careful consideration of our financial performance, including actions taken during fiscal 2020 to mitigate the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, our company’s plans and strategic opportunities for fiscal 2021 and relevant market data with respect to incentive compensation, our compensation committee determined that the reinstatement of an annual cash incentive program for our ~~NEOs. The program set target awards and performance goals based exclusively on the performance of our company or applicable operating group during the year. The~~NEOs for fiscal ~~2015 program~~2021 was ~~generally similar in structure and operation to the program established in recent years.~~

appropriate.

30 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Consistent with the objective of motivating our NEOs to achieve and exceed performance goals, our compensation committee approved threshold, target and maximum award levels expressed as a percentage of each ~~NEO's~~NEO’s base salary for fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, as follows:

	Cash Incentive Awards (% of Base Salary)						Fiscal 2021 Base Salary ($)		Fiscal 2021 Target Cash Incentive Award ($)
Name	At Threshold		At Target		At Maximum		Fiscal 2021 Base Salary ($)		Fiscal 2021 Target Cash Incentive Award ($)
Thomas C. Chubb III		25%		100%		175%		880,000		880,000
K. Scott Grassmyer		12.5%		50%		87.5%		437,750		218,875
Thomas E. Campbell		12.5%		50%		87.5%		437,750		218,875
Michelle M. Kelly		15%		60%		105%		585,000		351,000
Douglas B. Wood		13.75%		55%		96.25%		742,500		408,375

Cash Incentive Awards (% of Base Salary)
Name
At Threshold At Target At Maximum
Thomas C. Chubb III
25 % 100 % 175 %
K. Scott Grassmyer
12.5 % 50 % 87.5 %
Scott A. Beaumont
12.5 % 50 % 87.5 %
Thomas E. Campbell
12.5 % 50 % 87.5 %
Terry R. Pillow
15 % 60 % 105 %

~~For cash incentive awards that could become payable to Mr. Chubb, Mr. Grassmyer and/or Mr. Campbell, our~~Our compensation committee approved individual performance measures for each of our NEOs based on profit before taxes, as adjusted for ~~specifically identified~~ non-recurring or unusual items (PBT), of our company and each of our operating groups. ~~The total cash incentive award for each of these individuals was comprised of distinct performance measure components tied to our company as a~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~whole, as well as each of our operating groups individually.~~ PBT is a performance measure which we believe drives shareholder value by focusing management on the profitability of our company and/or operating groups, taking into consideration the cost of the capital being deployed.

In an effort to further our pay for performance philosophy and better align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders, our compensation committee determined that setting separate performance goals for the first half of fiscal 2021 and the full fiscal year, with the development of goals for the full fiscal year delayed until later in the year, would allow the committee to most effectively set meaningful performance goals. In light of the significant uncertainty present in early fiscal 2021 with respect to the scope of the COVID-19 pandemic and its continued effects on our business, as evidenced by continued depression in consumer traffic at retail throughout February 2021, the committee concluded that in March 2021, neither the committee nor our management could confidently predict our performance during the year or set meaningful, yet realistic performance goals for fiscal 2021. Accordingly, the program adopted by our compensation committee for fiscal 2021 included separate award opportunities and performance goals based on the performance of our company or the applicable operating group for the first half of fiscal 2021 (comprising 50% of the total award opportunity) and for the full fiscal year (comprising the other 50% of the total award opportunity). Performance targets for the first half of fiscal 2021 were set in March 2021, and performance targets for the full fiscal year were subsequently set in May 2021 when the committee had better visibility into the retail environment and rebound in consumer demand in 2021.

For cash incentive awards that could become payable to Mr. ~~Beaumont,~~Chubb, Mr. Campbell and/or Mr. Grassmyer, the incentive award was based ~~entirely~~ on the PBT of our ~~Lilly Pulitzer Group's satisfaction of applicable PBT targets.~~company as a whole during the relevant periods. For cash incentive awards that could become payable to Ms. Kelly and Mr. ~~Pillow,~~Wood, the incentive award was based ~~entirely~~ on ~~Tommy Bahama Group's~~the satisfaction of applicable PBT ~~targets.~~

targets by our Lilly Pulitzer operating group and Tommy Bahama operating group, respectively, during the relevant periods.

For each of ~~these individuals,~~our NEOs, if the applicable threshold performance measure was not met for either the first half of fiscal 2021 or the full fiscal year, no cash incentive would be payable ~~under the EPIP unless the applicable threshold performance measure for the applicable operating group was satisfied.~~

~~Although a cash incentive award was approved by our compensation committee for Mr. Maidment~~ in respect of ~~fiscal 2015,~~that component of the ~~incentive award was superseded by the terms of his Incentive and Settlement Agreement approved in connection with us pursuing a sale of our former Ben Sherman Group.~~

bonus opportunity.

In establishing performance targets for ~~cash incentive award opportunities for each~~the first half of ~~our NEOs for~~ fiscal ~~2015,~~2021 and the full fiscal year, our compensation committee took into consideration our ~~original budgeted plans~~forecasts for the fiscal year at the time of setting the target, including the anticipated continued impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on returning our businesses to pre-pandemic levels and ~~anticipated changes in our business(es)~~implementing strategic initiatives designed to position them to emerge from the ~~prior year.~~

•: COVID-19 pandemic poised to achieve future growth.

Performance Targets—Total Company

For purposes of the cash incentive award for Mr. Chubb, Mr. ~~Grassmyer~~Campbell and Mr. ~~Campbell,~~Grassmyer, the table below sets forth the threshold, target and maximum performance targets for our company as a whole for the first half of fiscal 2021 and the full fiscal year; the performance of our company as a whole for the first half of fiscal 2021 and the full fiscal year relative to the performance targets; the applicable weighting allocated to performance for each of the first half of fiscal 2021 and the full fiscal year; and the weighted contribution to the actual incentive award earned by each of these executive officers.

	Performance Target ($ in 000s)									Actual Performance	Actual Achievement as a Percent of Target		Weighting for Composite Bonus		Weighted Contribution to Actual Composite Bonus Earned
Performance Measure(s)	Threshold			Target			Maximum			Actual Performance	Actual Achievement as a Percent of Target		Weighting for Composite Bonus		Weighted Contribution to Actual Composite Bonus Earned
PBT, Total Company – First Half		$	16,950		$	28,250		$	39,550	> Maximum		175%		50.0%		87.5%
PBT, Total Company – Full Year		$	41,000		$	53,500		$	68,000	> Maximum		175%		50.0%		87.5%
														100.0%		175%

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Performance Targets—Lilly Pulitzer

For purposes of the cash incentive award to Ms. Kelly, the table below sets forth the threshold, target and maximum performance targets established by our compensation committee for ~~each~~our Lilly Pulitzer operating group for the first half of fiscal 2021 and the full fiscal year; the performance of our Lilly Pulitzer operating ~~groups~~group for the first half of fiscal 2021 and ~~our company as a whole;~~ the ~~actual~~full fiscal year relative to the performance ~~of each of our operating groups and our company as a whole during fiscal 2015;~~targets; the applicable weighting allocated to performance for each of ~~our operating groups~~the first half of fiscal 2021 and ~~our company as a whole;~~the full fiscal year; and the weighted contribution to the actual incentive award earned by ~~each of these executive officers.~~Ms. Kelly.

	Performance Target ($ in 000s)									Actual Performance	Actual Achievement as a Percent of Target		Weighting for Composite Bonus		Weighted Contribution to Actual Composite Bonus Earned
Performance Measure(s)	Threshold			Target			Maximum			Actual Performance	Actual Achievement as a Percent of Target		Weighting for Composite Bonus		Weighted Contribution to Actual Composite Bonus Earned
PBT, Lilly Pulitzer – First Half		$	19,470		$	25,960		$	32,450	> Maximum		175%		50.0%		87.5%
PBT, Lilly Pulitzer – Full Year		$	31,556		$	37,868		$	45,231	> Maximum		175%		50.0%		87.5%
														100.0%		175%

Performance Targets—Tommy Bahama

•

For purposes of the cash incentive ~~awards~~award to Mr. ~~Beaumont and Mr. Pillow,~~Wood, the table below ~~includes~~sets forth the threshold, target and maximum performance targets established by our compensation committee for our ~~Lilly Pulitzer Group and~~ Tommy Bahama ~~Group, respectively,~~operating group for the first half of fiscal 2021 and the ~~actual~~full fiscal year; the performance of ~~each~~our Tommy Bahama operating group for the first half of ~~those operating groups during~~ fiscal ~~2015.~~

Weighting
for
Corporate
Composite
Bonus Weighted
Contribution to
Actual Corporate
Composite Bonus
Earned

Performance Target
Actual
Achievement
as a Percent
of Target

Actual
Performance
Performance Measure(s) ($ in 000s)
Threshold Target Maximum
PBT of total company
$ 54,403 $ 63,073 $ 71,743 $ 70,096 160.8 % 50.0 % 80.4 %
PBT of Tommy Bahama Group
$ 41,066 $ 48,313 $ 55,560 < Threshold 0 % 30.0 % 0 %
PBT of Lilly Pulitzer Group
$ 27,999 $ 32,940 $ 37,881 > Maximum 175 % 10.0 % 17.5 %
PBT of Lanier Clothes
$ 5,200 $ 7,900 $ 10,600 $ 7,593 91.5 % 6.0 % 5.5 %
PBT of Ben Sherman Group^*
— — — — 175 % 4.0 % 7.0 %

100.0 % 110.4 %

*: ~~The methodology for determining~~2021 and the ~~contribution of our Ben Sherman Group operations towards~~full fiscal year relative to the ~~composite cash incentive for Messrs. Chubb, Grassmyer and Campbell, as approved by our compensation committee, was adjusted based on our successful sale of~~performance targets; the ~~Ben Sherman Group.~~

~~The target PBT for each group and for total company were generally in line with our original forecast for fiscal 2015, except the component~~applicable weighting allocated to performance ~~targets~~ for each of ~~our operating groups~~the first half of fiscal 2021 and ~~our total company were set higher than our forecast (other than Lilly Pulitzer, which was based on our original budget), emphasizing for our executive management~~ the necessity to exceed our own plans in order to receive a target level incentive award. In addition, in furtherance of our objective to drive sustained, profitable growth within our organization, our total company, Tommy Bahamafull fiscal year; and ~~Lilly Pulitzer target performance goals were set at levels requiring improvement in PBT relative~~the weighted contribution to the actual ~~fiscal 2014 results.~~

incentive award earned by Mr. Wood.

	Performance Target ($ in 000s)									Actual Performance	Actual Achievement as a Percent of Target		Weighting for Composite Bonus		Weighted Contribution to Actual Composite Bonus Earned
Performance Measure(s)	Threshold			Target			Maximum			Actual Performance	Actual Achievement as a Percent of Target		Weighting for Composite Bonus		Weighted Contribution to Actual Composite Bonus Earned
PBT, Tommy Bahama – First Half		$	6,300		$	18,000		$	29,700	> Maximum		175%		50.0%		87.5%
PBT, Tommy Bahama – Full Year		$	29,617		$	34,843		$	40,941	> Maximum		175%		50.0%		87.5%
														100.0%		175%

Fiscal 2021 Incentive Awards

~~Table of Contents~~

Based on our fiscal ~~2015~~2021 performance, each of our NEOs earned the following cash incentives in respect of fiscal ~~2015:~~

2021:

Name	Bonus Award at Target ($)			Bonus Award Earned (as % of Target)		Bonus Award Earned ($)
Thomas C. Chubb III		$	880,000		175%		$	1,540,000
K. Scott Grassmyer		$	218,875		175%		$	383,031
Thomas E. Campbell		$	218,875		175%		$	383,031
Michelle M. Kelly		$	351,000		175%		$	614,250
Douglas B. Wood		$	408,375		175%		$	714,656

Name
Bonus Award
at Target ($) Bonus Award Earned
(as % of Target) Bonus Award
Earned ($)
Thomas C. Chubb III
$ 800,000 110.4 % $ 883,200
K. Scott Grassmyer
$ 192,500 110.4 % $ 212,520
Scott A. Beaumont
$ 300,000 175 % $ 525,000
Thomas E. Campbell
$ 192,500 110.4 % $ 212,520
Terry R. Pillow
$ 525,000 0 % $ 0

Although our compensation committee retains "downward discretion" to reduce (but not to increase) the total cash incentive awards payable to any of our NEOs, it did not exercise its discretion in respect of fiscal 2015.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

Our compensation committee utilizes stock-based incentive awards under the LTIP to incent our NEOs to remain with our company and further align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders. Our compensation committee typically considers and approves long-term equity incentive awards in March of each year.

Our compensation committee believes that a mix of performance-based and service-based equity awards furthers the program’s incentive and retention objectives. In ~~March 2015,~~fiscal 2020, after carefully considering the overall economic environment and market practice, our compensation committee approved performance-based awards based on a multi-year relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) metric, which represented a change from our prior practice of awarding performance-based restricted stock awards that vested contingent upon our achievement of one-year earnings per share performance goals. Our compensation committee believes that multi-year relative TSR awards continue to reflect market best practices and effectively

32 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

align the ~~equity~~interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders by tying the compensation of our executives to whether or not we deliver value to our shareholders relative to other companies in our industry.

For fiscal 2021, our long-term incentive compensation program ~~for fiscal 2015.~~

~~For fiscal 2015, the program consisted solely of~~ included two equity elements:

•

performance-based ~~restricted stock~~equity awards under the LTIP that provided participants the opportunity to earn ~~restricted shares~~RSUs contingent upon our achievement of certain ~~earnings per share~~ performance goals for our company ~~during fiscal 2015. Any restricted shares~~based on multi-year TSR relative to a representative set of comparator group companies, with any RSUs earned by recipients ~~would be~~vesting on, or shortly after, May 31, 2024, as further described below and in the applicable award agreements; and

•

service-based restricted shares under the LTIP, consisting of (i) service-based restricted shares that are subject to a ~~two year~~three-year vesting period, with the ~~shares subject to~~awards cliff vesting on May 31, 2024, and (ii) a one-time grant of service-based restricted shares to Ms. Kelly in light of Ms. Kelly’s strategic leadership and Lilly Pulitzer’s outstanding performance during the COVID-19 pandemic, consisting of 2,000 service-based restricted shares that were subject to a one-year vesting period and cliff vested on April ~~16, 2018.~~

8, 2022.

One of our company’s key strategic priorities in recent years, including prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, has been improving the operating performance of Tommy Bahama, our largest operating group, which has a significant impact on our company’s overall performance. In making decisions regarding long-term equity incentive compensation for fiscal 2021, our compensation committee determined that more heavily weighting Mr. Wood’s compensation toward performance-based elements was consistent with that focus. Accordingly, our compensation committee, taking into consideration Mr. Wood’s own views on emphasizing Tommy Bahama’s successful delivery of strong returns for our shareholders, awarded Mr. Wood only performance-based RSUs for fiscal 2021, rather than a combination of performance-based RSUs and service-based restricted shares, to more closely align Mr. Wood’s compensation with the performance of our company.

The table below sets forth the awards approved by our compensation committee for each ~~participating NEO~~of our NEOs for the fiscal ~~2015~~2021 LTIP program.

Name	Performance-Based RSUs at Target (# of shares)		Service-Based Restricted Shares (# of shares)
Thomas C. Chubb III		14,500		6,215
K. Scott Grassmyer		4,500		2,000
Thomas E. Campbell		4,500		2,000
Michelle M. Kelly		4,500		4,000
Douglas B. Wood		6,500		—

Performance-Based Restricted Shares
(# of shares)
Name
At Threshold At Target At Maximum
Thomas C. Chubb III
2,588 10,350 18,113
K. Scott Grassmyer
913 3,650 6,388
Thomas E. Campbell
913 3,650 6,388
Terry R. Pillow
1,813 7,250 12,688

The ~~2015 earnings per share~~number of shares that will actually be received by each NEO is subject to applicable vesting and performance ~~goals established~~criteria. Performance-based RSUs will vest based on our company’s TSR relative to the TSR of certain peer companies in a comparator group approved by ~~the~~our compensation committee ~~for~~(which comparator group includes certain companies included in our peer group set forth under “—Compensation Decision Process,” as well as certain industry participants with whom we regularly compare our stock performance) during the three-year performance period ending May 3, 2024.

For purposes of the performance-based ~~restricted stock~~equity awards, were as follows: threshold—$3.10; target—$3.65; and maximum—$4.20. Our actual fiscal 2015 earnings per share, as defined under the program, was $3.68. The earnings per share for our performance-based restricted stock awards differs from the adjusted earnings per share that we report in our earnings releasesa company’s TSR is determined based on the ~~earnings per share definition established by the compensation committee in connection with approving~~dividend-adjusted price appreciation of its common stock during the performance ~~goals and awards under the fiscal 2015 LTIP program.~~

~~As a result~~period. The actual number of ~~our performance, 104.1%~~performance-based shares that may be issued will range from 0% to 200% of the target award, based on the percentile rank of our TSR relative to the TSRs of the companies in the comparator group during the performance period, according to the following percentage vesting schedule:

Company TSR Percentile Rank	RSUs as Percentage of Target
<25%		0%
25%		25%
50%		100%
75%		150%
90%		200%

If our TSR percentile is between the points shown above, the percentage of performance-based ~~restricted shares~~RSUs that vest will be determined based on linear interpolation. RSUs will vest on or after May 31, 2024 based on, among other things, the timing of our compensation committee’s certification of our TSR relative to the TSR of the companies in our comparator group. One share of our common stock will be issued for ~~fiscal 2015 were earned. From~~each RSU earned and vested. If our absolute TSR is negative over the ~~actual grant~~performance period, the payout will not exceed 100% of the target number of performance-based RSUs. No performance-based RSUs will be earned ~~restricted shares in March 2016 through the applicable vesting date,~~if our ~~participating NEOs receive dividends on these restricted shares and are entitled to voting rights.~~ percentile rank is lower than 25%.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The fiscal ~~2015~~2021 equity awards would generally be forfeited if the recipient is not continuously employed by us through ~~April 16, 2018.~~the applicable vesting date. Accelerated vesting of the award ~~is limited to~~occurs in a ~~"double trigger"~~“double trigger” scenario (i.e., a change of control of our company ~~and~~followed by a termination of employment by the individual with ~~good reason~~“good reason” or by us or our acquiror without ~~cause). In addition, amounts received~~“cause”) or, ~~that may be received under the fiscal 2015 equity compensation program are subject to a clawback provision~~ in the ~~event~~case of ~~certain material restatements of our financial statements.~~

In light of the cash long-term incentive compensation approved for Mr. Beaumont during fiscal 2014 in anticipation of his pending retirement and the Incentive and Settlement Agreement approved for Mr. Maidment tied to a successful sale of our former Ben Sherman Group, all of which are described under~~"—Other Special Incentives,"~~ ~~our compensation committee did not approve~~performance-based equity awards, ~~to either Mr. Beaumont or Mr. Maidment~~ in ~~respect of fiscal 2015.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Other Special Incentives~~

~~Mr. Beaumont~~

~~In order to encourage~~ the retention of Mr. Beaumont, the now retired CEO of our Lilly Pulitzer Group, and ensure an orderly transition, our compensation committee approved two special cash long-term incentive opportunities for him during fiscal 2014.

Specifically, the compensation committee approved a cash long-term incentive compensation award based on Lilly Pulitzer's cumulative PBT performance over a seven-quarter performance period from the second quarter of fiscal 2014 through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. At the end of the performance period, the plan provided that Mr. Beaumont would be entitled to a one-time payout of up to $3 million at maximum PBT performance over the performance period, with a target payout of $1 million and a target PBT goal which we considered to be robust. Based on the actual performance of our Lilly Pulitzer Group over the applicable performance period, the maximum $3 million payout was paid to Mr. Beaumont in April 2016. In addition, our compensation committee approved a special succession planning bonus with a one-time payout of $750,000, which was also paid to Mr. Beaumont in April 2016 based on the successful implementation of an approved succession and transition plan.

Our compensation committee believed these award opportunities were appropriate as an effective retention incentive that took into consideration the conclusion of Mr. Beaumont's employment and earnout agreements during fiscal 2014 (both of which were entered into in connection with our 2010 acquisition of the Lilly Pulitzer Group operations) and in order to ensure a smooth transition with any future management succession.

~~Mr. Maidment~~

~~In connection with our pursuit~~case of a ~~sale~~change of ~~our former Ben Sherman Group during fiscal 2015, which we publicly announced in March 2015, our compensation committee approved us entering into~~control where the awards are neither continued following a ~~special Incentive and Settlement Agreement with Mr. Maidment, then the CEO~~change of our Ben Sherman Group. The aggregate amount payable to Mr. Maidment pursuant to this agreement was £535,500 (or $813,960) (inclusive of reimbursement of out-of-pocket legal fees incurred by Mr. Maidment in connection with entering into this agreement), with the specific amount to be received by him tied to, among other things, the successful sale of our Ben Sherman Group, certain amounts subject to Mr. Maidment's continued employment with Ben Sherman following the transaction to support transition efforts (if desiredcontrol nor assumed or converted by the acquiror), and certain amounts taking into consideration other factors such as the financial performance of our former Ben Sherman Group through the closing date of a sale transaction. The aggregate amount payable under Mr. Maidment's Incentive and Settlement Agreement was based, in part, on the cash incentive opportunity and previously unvested equity awards he would forfeit immediately upon the closing of a transaction. Our compensation committee believed that this agreement was appropriate and customary as a retention incentive to facilitate a smooth transaction process and to further align the interests of our company and our shareholders with that of potential acquirors. In connection with the sale transaction, the aggregate £535,500 (or $813,960) was paid to Mr. Maidment.

In addition, following the conclusion of our sale of our former Ben Sherman Group, Mr. Maidment resigned from his position as CEO of our former Ben Sherman Group. Subsequent to his departure from Ben Sherman, we engaged Mr. Maidment for a six month term to provide consulting services with respect to, among other things, providing insight into various lifestyle brands.

successor entity.

Other Benefit Plans and Perquisites

~~Retirement Savings Plan.~~ During fiscal 2015, we provided retirement benefits to our eligible employees, including our NEOs based in the United States, under the terms of our tax-qualified retirement savings plan (which we also refer to as our "401(k) plan"). Our 401(k) plan is intended to promote retirement savings by providing employees with an opportunity to save in a tax-efficient manner. During calendar year 2015, we made matching contributions to participants who had achieved a minimum of one year of service under the plan of (1) 100% of the first 3% of the participant's compensation that is deferred and (2) 50% of the next 2% of the participant's compensation that was deferred.

Our company contributions under the 401(k) plan are subject to limitations prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code. Our company contributions to the 401(k) plan vest immediately. Our eligible NEOs are permitted to make contributions to the plan solely from pre-tax compensation and participate in our 401(k) plan on the same terms as other "highly compensated employees" (determined under applicable Internal Revenue Service guidelines) of our company. During fiscal 2015, Messrs. Chubb, Grassmyer, Beaumont and Campbell participated in our 401(k) plan. Company contributions for each NEO

~~Table of Contents~~

~~during fiscal 2015 under our 401(k) plan are included in the table below under "—~~~~Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2015.~~~~" Mr. Maidment, as a U.K.-based executive officer, was not eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan.~~

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. We offer a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the ~~"Deferred~~“Deferred Compensation Plan,"” to certain highly compensated employees based in the United States, including our ~~U.S.-based~~ NEOs (other than ~~Mr. Beaumont,~~Ms. Kelly, who ~~was~~is an employee of our Lilly Pulitzer ~~Group,~~operating group, which does not ~~currently~~ participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan). Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, a participant may defer up to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of ~~an annual performance-based cash incentive award.~~any bonus. The eligible NEOs participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan on the same terms as our other eligible, participating employees. During fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, Messrs. Chubb, Grassmyer, Campbell and ~~Pillow~~Wood participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan. ~~Mr. Maidment, as a U.K.-based executive officer, was not eligible to participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan.~~

All deferral elections are irrevocable except in the case of a qualifying hardship. In respect of calendar year ~~2015,~~2021, we made a contribution to each ~~participant's~~participant’s account of (1) 4% of the amount that a ~~participant's~~participant’s compensation during the calendar year exceeded the IRS’ 401(k) compensation limit for the calendar year (which for calendar year ~~2015~~2021 was ~~$265,000)~~$290,000), and (2) 4% of any compensation that is excluded from receiving a company match in ~~the~~our tax-qualified 401(k) retirement savings plan due to participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan, provided in each case that the participant elects under the Deferred Compensation Plan to defer at least 1% of his or her base salary ~~following enrollment in~~for the ~~Deferred Compensation Plan.~~year. Company contributions for each NEO during fiscal ~~2015~~2021 under our Deferred Compensation Plan are included in the table below under "—“—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal ~~2015.~~2021.”

The Deferred Compensation Plan is intended to offer our highly compensated employees, including our eligible NEOs, a tax-efficient method for accumulating retirement savings, as well as to provide an opportunity for ~~our executives~~these employees to accumulate savings in a tax-efficient manner for significant expenses while continuing in service. The Deferred Compensation Plan constitutes an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan, and ~~participants'~~participants’ account balances are subject to the claims of our ~~company's~~company’s creditors. In the event that our company becomes insolvent, participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan would be unsecured general creditors with respect to their account balances, which we believe further aligns the interests of our participating NEOs with the long-term interests of our shareholders.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants may elect to have contributions during a given calendar year distributed as either: in-service distributions starting at least two years following the year of the applicable contributions in a single sum or in annual installment payments over a period of up to five years; or following a deemed retirement (which occurs when a participant reaches age 55 with at least five years of service) generally in a single sum or in annual installment payments over a period of up to 15 years. Distribution of account balances in a single sum is automatically made on termination for reasons other than a deemed retirement. Participants elect to invest their account balances among a variety of investment options in an array of asset classes, and earnings are based on the equivalent returns from the elected investment options. Accounts are 100% vested at all times.

Because ~~none of~~ our ~~NEOs received~~Deferred Compensation Plan does not provide above-market, fixed rates of return, ~~under the Deferred Compensation Plan,~~ earnings under the plan are not included in the table below under "—“—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal ~~2015.~~2021."” Earnings and related activity under the Deferred Compensation Plan by our NEOs during fiscal ~~2015~~2021 are described below under "—“—Compensation Tables—Fiscal ~~2015~~2021 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”

~~Ben Sherman Group Personal Pension Scheme.~~ Our former Ben Sherman Group established a group personal pension scheme registered with Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC). Participation in the plan was limited to management staff and certain other executives of our former Ben Sherman Group who are resident in the United Kingdom. Under the terms of Mr. Maidment's prior employment contract, our Ben Sherman Group contributed an amount equal to 5% of Mr. Maidment's base salary to his pension scheme account (which was the customary contribution rate for other participants of our former Ben Sherman Group).

Executive Medical Insurance ~~Plans.~~Plan. During ~~calendar year 2015,~~fiscal 2021, certain of our key employees, ~~based in the United States,~~ including Messrs. Chubb, Grassmyer and Campbell, were eligible to ~~receive reimbursement of qualified~~participate in a fully insured executive medical plan that covers medical expenses, ~~in an amount~~including deductibles, as well as dental, vision and similar coverage, not covered under a base medical plan. The plan provides for coverage of up to $100,000 per year with a limit of $10,000 per occurrence. ~~Our executive medical insurance plan reimburses eligible executives for reasonable, medically necessary expenses that are not covered under a base medical plan.~~ Our executive medical insurance also provides for a $100,000 accidental death and dismemberment benefit that will pay an eligible ~~executive officer's~~employee’s beneficiary the lump sum amount in the event of death as a result of a covered accident. ~~Starting with calendar year 2016,~~Our Lilly Pulitzer and Tommy Bahama operating groups do not participate in the executive medical insurance ~~was procured through a third party insurer providing substantially the same benefits as~~plan; accordingly, Ms. Kelly and Mr. Wood were not eligible to participate in ~~effect during calendar year 2015. In addition, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Beaumont's employment agreement when we acquired the Lilly Pulitzer brand~~this plan.

Premiums and ~~operations in 2010, we agreed to pay the health, dental, life and long-term disability insurance premiums for Mr. Beaumont and his dependents on his behalf.~~

Our former Ben Sherman Group maintained a private medical insurance plan for management staff and certain other executives, which Mr. Maidment participated in during fiscal 2015. The medical plan was a "top-up" plan providing access to private healthcare facilities for certain illnesses and surgical procedures.

~~Company contributions~~administration fees paid by us for each participating NEO during fiscal ~~2015~~2021 under ~~our~~the executive medical insurance plan ~~or the Ben Sherman Group private medical insurance plan (for the period during which we owned the Ben Sherman Group), as applicable, and the~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~payment of premiums for Mr. Beaumont and his dependents~~ are included in the table below under"“—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal ~~2015."~~2021.”

~~Income Protection Scheme.~~ Our former Ben Sherman Group maintained an income protection scheme insured by a third party that is available to individuals participating in the group's pension scheme. The income protection scheme provides eligible employees with a benefit of 100% of the employee's base salary in the event of long-term illness or disability which results in incapacity for work. Mr. Maidment was a participant in this health insurance scheme. Company contributions to Mr. Maidment during fiscal 2015 under this health insurance scheme, for the period during which we owned the Ben Sherman Group, are included in the table below under "—~~Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2015~~."

~~Car Allowance.~~ Consistent with the terms set forth in Mr. Maidment's prior employment agreement, Mr. Maidment was entitled to a car allowance of £8,000 (or $12,160) per year, which he received as cash compensation in monthly installments in respect of the use of his own personal vehicle.

Other Benefits. In addition to some of the other compensation policies discussed above, our NEOs are generally eligible to participate in and receive the same health, life insurance and disability benefits, and to participate in certain other benefit and retirement plans available to our employees generally, subject to distinctions in our plans that are applicable to employees of our ~~subsidiaries and/or~~subsidiaries. Company contributions to our tax-qualified 401(k) retirement savings plan are ~~based on residency requirements.~~included in the table below under “—

Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2021.”

34 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Merchandise ~~Discounts.~~Discounts. From time to time, our NEOs receive discounts on ~~merchandise purchased directly from~~ our ~~distribution centers or through our direct to consumer channels,~~company’s merchandise, as well as complimentary meals at our Tommy Bahama restaurants. Certain of these discounts and benefits are offered to other designated employees from time to time. We offer these discounts and benefits because they represent common practice in our industry.

Written Arrangements

Subject to the effect of local labor laws, all of our employees, including all of our NEOs, are “at-will” employees terminable at our discretion. We do not currently have a written employment or severance agreement with any of our ~~continuing~~ NEOs. However, certain of the terms of Mr. Beaumont's employment with our Lilly Pulitzer Group, such as our payment of the health, dental, life and long-term disability insurance premiums for Mr. Beaumont and his dependents, continued throughout fiscal 2015 consistent with the terms of an employment agreement we entered into with Mr. Beaumont in connection with our acquisition of the Lilly Pulitzer brand and operations in December 2010. The term of that employment agreement expired on January 31, 2015.

Clawback Policy

~~In March 2015, we adopted~~

We maintain a recoupment or ~~"clawback"~~“clawback” policy in order to further align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our shareholders and strengthen the link between total compensation and our performance. Under this policy, we may seek to recover certain incentive-based cash and equity compensation from ~~any~~ current orand former executive ~~officer who received incentive-based compensation during~~officers in the ~~three-year period preceding the date on which we announce that~~event we are required to restate any ~~previously issued~~of our financial statements due to material noncompliance with ~~any~~ financial reporting ~~requirement under federal securities laws.~~

requirements.

Under the policy, the amount to be recovered will be determined by the compensation committee taking into account such considerations as it deems appropriate, including the overpayment relative to the ~~incentive based-compensation~~incentive-based compensation that would have been paid to the employee if the financial statements had been as presented in the restatement. Incentive-based compensation is defined broadly to include bonuses, awards or grants of cash or equity under any of our ~~short or long-term~~ incentive compensation or bonus plans, including but not limited to the LTIP, ~~and the EPIP,~~ in each instance where the bonuses, awards or grants are based in whole or in part on the achievement of financial results. The policy gives the compensation committee discretion to interpret and apply the policy.

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines; Anti-Pledging/Hedging Policy

Our Board has established stock ownership guidelines for our executive ~~officers, including the NEOs.~~officers. The ownership guidelines specify a target number of shares of our common stock that our executive officers are expected to accumulate and hold within five years of appointment to the applicable position. Pursuant to these guidelines, each of our executive officers is expected to own or acquire shares of our common stock having a fair market value of a multiple of his or her base salary as follows: Chief Executive ~~Officer—~~Officer—4.0x; ~~President—~~President—2.5x; Executive Vice ~~Presidents—~~Presidents—2.0x; and All Other Executive ~~Officers—~~Officers—1.5x.

~~Table~~ Each of ~~Contents~~our executive officers has satisfied the applicable stock ownership guideline.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide for a retention guideline, or holding period, of one year for stock acquired upon the ~~exercise of options or~~ lapse of restrictions on restricted stock or exercise of options (net of funds reasonably expected to be necessary to satisfy applicable taxes and/or pay the exercise price of stock options) that applies to our executive ~~officers, including our NEOs.~~

officers.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our insider trading policy, our directors and executive officers ~~including our NEOs,~~ are prohibited from hedging the economic risk of ownership of our ~~company's~~company’s stock, including through the use of puts, calls, equity swaps or other derivative securities, or from entering into any pledge arrangements that use our ~~company's~~company’s stock as collateral for a loan or other purposes.

~~Tax Deductibility Considerations~~

It is the responsibility of our compensation committee to address the issues raised by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) generally prohibits us from deducting the compensation of certain NEOs that exceeds $1,000,000 during any year. The limitation does not apply to compensation based on achievement of pre-established performance goals if certain requirements are met. Our EPIP and LTIP are structured to permit certain awards to qualify as performance-based compensation to maximize the tax deductibility of such awards. Our compensation committee, as it deems appropriate, uses and intends to use performance-based compensation to limit the amount of compensation paid by us that would not be eligible for deductibility. However, our compensation committee believes that we must be able to attract, retain and reward the executive leadership necessary to develop and execute our strategic plans and that the loss of a tax deduction may be necessary and appropriate in some circumstances. Accordingly, our compensation committee may exercise its discretion to award compensation in excess of the Section 162(m) limits as it deems necessary or appropriate.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal ~~2015~~

2021

The table below shows the compensation for each of our NEOs for the applicable fiscal years:

Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year(1)		Salary ($)		Stock Awards ($)(2)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3)			All Other Compensation ($)(4)		Total ($)(5)
Thomas C. Chubb III Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President		2021		850,385		2,249,159		��	1,540,000		126,326		4,765,870
		2020		702,308		1,590,056			—		125,017		2,417,381
		2019		880,000		1,222,400			493,680		159,548		2,755,628
K. Scott Grassmyer Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer		2021		436,034		704,370			383,031		74,333		1,597,768
		2020		404,567		635,982			—		71,395		1,111,944
		2019		425,000		458,400			119,213		80,413		1,083,026
Thomas E. Campbell Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer		2021		436,034		704,370			383,031		74,735		1,598,170
		2020		404,567		635,982			—		71,796		1,112,346
		2019		425,000		458,400			119,213		80,413		1,083,026
Michelle M. Kelly Chief Executive Officer, Lilly Pulitzer		2021		582,611		882,870			614,250		39,502		2,119,233
		2020		567,250		665,832			—		35,006		1,268,088
		2019		564,928		397,280			500,995		44,984		1,508,187
Douglas B. Wood Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Bahama		2021		733,606		759,590			714,656		49,006		2,256,858
		2020		499,122		768,614			—		39,296		1,307,032
		2019		742,499		397,280			—		85,118		1,224,897

Name and Principal Position
Fiscal
Year Salary
($) Bonus Stock
Awards
($)⁽¹⁾ Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)⁽²⁾ All Other
Compensation
($)⁽³⁾ Total
($)
Thomas C. Chubb III
2015 796,154 — 605,061 883,200 86,978 2,371,393
Chairman, Chief Executive
2014 767,308 — 1,067,430 614,575 52,232 2,501,544
Officer and President
2013 725,000 — 544,800 167,475 69,107 1,506,382
K. Scott Grassmyer
2015 381,154 — 213,379 212,520 44,291 851,344
Executive Vice President-Finance,
2014 354,615 — 414,460 142,740 29,122 940,937
Chief Financial Officer
2013 320,000 — 272,400 37,538 42,200 672,138
and Controller

Scott A. Beaumont
2015 592,308 — — 3,525,000 18,457 4,135,765
Retired CEO, Lilly Pulitzer Group
2014 540,192 — — 481,250 20,879 1,042,321

2013 490,385 — — 53,500 18,275 562,160
Thomas E. Campbell
2015 381,154 — 213,379 212,520 54,395 861,448
Executive Vice President-Law and
2014 354,615 — 414,460 142,740 23,299 935,115
Administration, General Counsel
2013 320,000 — 272,400 37,538 28,226 658,164
and Secretary

Mark Maidment⁽⁴⁾
2015 149,551 813,960 — — 95,177 1,058,688
Former CEO, Ben Sherman Group

Terry R. Pillow
2015 871,152 — 423,835 — 53,097 1,348,084
Retired CEO, Tommy Bahama Group
2014 845,190 — 825,010 214,710 37,205 1,922,115
2013 800,199 — 544,800 54,450 71,261 1,470,710

(1): ~~The values~~

Compensation for ~~stock~~the fiscal years presented may not be comparable as (a) certain of our NEOs voluntarily took reductions in base salary during fiscal 2020 in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, (b) our compensation committee suspended our short-term cash incentive award program for fiscal 2020 in response to uncertainty regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and (c) performance-based equity awards in ~~this column represent~~fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021 were based on relative TSR rather than earnings per share and are valued using a different methodology than fiscal 2019 performance-based equity awards.

(2)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of ~~performance-based~~ equity incentive compensation awards approved in fiscal ~~2015,~~2021, fiscal ~~2014~~2020 and fiscal ~~2013,~~2019, as applicable, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718; however, pursuant to SEC regulations, no reduction has been applied for estimated forfeitures. Awards with performance conditions are computed based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the award.718. Information about the assumptions used to value these awards can be found under the ~~captions "Equity Compensation" and "Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan"~~ caption “Equity Compensation” in Notes 1 and ~~7, respectively,~~8 in our ~~Fiscal 2015~~2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. ~~For~~

With respect to the value of performance-based RSU awards included for fiscal ~~2013,~~2021, the ~~performance conditions~~following sets forth the grant date fair value that was included in the table above (as also set forth below under “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021”) and the corresponding grant date fair value of these ~~stock~~ awards ~~were not met and ultimately no amounts were received by our NEOs.~~

~~Assuming~~assuming the maximum level of performance conditions was met for the performance-based restricted share awards during fiscal 2015, the grant date fair value of these awards for our NEOs would be as follows: Mr. Chubb—$1,058,886; Mr. Grassmyer—$373,442; Mr. Campbell—$373,442; and Mr. Pillow—$741,740.

met:

Name	Fair Value included in Summary Compensation Table ($)		Fair Value Assuming Maximum Performance ($)
Thomas C. Chubb III		1,694,470		3,388,940
K. Scott Grassmyer		525,870		1,051,740
Thomas E. Campbell		525,870		1,051,740
Michelle M. Kelly		525,870		1,051,740
Douglas B. Wood		759,590		1,519,180

(3)

~~Table of Contents~~

~~(2)~~: Amounts reported under ~~"Non-Equity~~“Non-Equity Incentive Plan ~~Compensation"~~Compensation” reflect cash incentive awards earned by each of our NEOs under our short-term cash incentive program (which is described above under “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Short-Term/Annual Incentive Compensation”) in respect of company and/or operating group performance during the applicable fiscal ~~year under~~year. Based on our ~~EPIP, as described above under "~~strong fiscal 2021 financial performance, each NEO earned the maximum cash incentive award for which s/he was eligible.

(4)

~~—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Short-Term Incentive Compensation~~~~" and, with respect to Mr. Beaumont, as described above under "~~~~—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Special Incentives.~~"

~~(3)~~

Amounts reported under ~~"All~~“All Other ~~Compensation"~~Compensation” for fiscal ~~2015~~2021 reflect the following amounts:

Name
Company
Paid Life
Insurance
($) Executive
Health
Insurance
($) Company
Contributions
to Defined
Contribution
Plans
($) Company
Contributions to
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
($) Car
Allowance Dividends
on Unvested
Stock
Awards
($) Post-
Employment
Consulting
Arrangements
Thomas C. Chubb III
365 8,918 9,507 47,644 — 20,545 —
K. Scott Grassmyer
— 14,967 10,129 11,111 — 8,084 —
Scott A. Beaumont
— 3,642 10,718 — — 4,097 —
Thomas E. Campbell
— 25,178 10,022 11,111 — 8,084 —
Mark Maidment
614 1,663 7,478 — 5,622 — 79,800
Terry R. Pillow
163 — — 33,406 — 19,528 —

36 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name	Executive Health Insurance ($)		Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plan ($)		Company Contributions to Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan ($)		Dividends on Unvested Stock Awards ($)
Thomas C. Chubb III		35,868		12,927		23,580		53,951
K. Scott Grassmyer		35,868		11,766		6,544		20,155
Thomas E. Campbell		35,868		12,167		6,544		20,155
Michelle M. Kelly		—		12,723		—		26,779
Douglas B. Wood		—		8,656		18,233		22,117

In addition, our NEOs, from time to time, may receive discounts on merchandise purchased directly from our ~~distribution centers~~company or ~~through our direct to consumer channels and may, from time to time, receive~~ complimentary meals at our Tommy Bahama ~~restaurants or allowances for apparel merchandise.~~restaurants. We do not believe that the aggregate incremental cost to us of these discounts and benefits exceeds $10,000 for any of our NEOs and are excluded from this table.

~~(4)~~: ~~Compensation paid~~

(5)

Totals may not add due to Mr. Maidment is denominated in pounds sterling; the compensation paid to Mr. Maidment has been restated to U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of pounds sterling 1.00 = U.S. $1.52, which represents the average month-end exchange rate during fiscal 2015 that was used for fiscal 2015 financial reporting purposes.rounding.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal ~~2015~~

2021

The following table presents information for fiscal ~~2015~~2021 regarding equity awards granted under our LTIP and possible cash awards that could have been earned for fiscal ~~2015~~2021 performance, as described above under ~~our EPIP or other special cash long-term incentive opportunities.~~

“—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Short-Term Incentive Compensation.”

	Grant Date		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)						All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock (#)(3)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)(4)
Name	Grant Date		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)		All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock (#)(3)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)(4)
Thomas C. Chubb III				220,000		880,000		1,540,000
		3/17/21								3,625		14,500		29,000				1,694,470
		3/17/21														6,215		554,689
K. Scott Grassmyer				54,719		218,875		383,031
		3/17/21								1,125		4,500		9,000				525,870
		3/17/21														2,000		178,500
Thomas E. Campbell				54,719		218,875		383,031
		3/17/21								1,125		4,500		9,000				525,870
		3/17/21														2,000		178,500
Michelle M. Kelly				87,750		351,000		614,250
		3/17/21								1,125		4,500		9,000				525,870
		3/17/21														4,000		357,000
Douglas B. Wood				102,094		408,375		714,656
Douglas B. Wood		3/17/21								1,625		6,500		13,000				759,590

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾ Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽²⁾ Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)⁽³⁾

Grant
Date
Name
Threshold ($) Target ($) Maximum ($) Threshold (#) Target (#) Maximum (#)
Thomas C. Chubb III
200,000 800,000 1,400,000

3/19/15 2,588 10,350 18,113 605,061
K. Scott Grassmyer
48,125 192,500 336,875
3/19/15 913 3,650 6,388 213,379
Scott A. Beaumont
75,000 300,000 525,000
Thomas E. Campbell
48,125 192,500 336,875
3/19/15 913 3,650 6,388 213,379
Terry R. Pillow
131,250 525,000 918,750

3/19/15 1,813 7,250 12,688 423,835

(1)

Reflects potential cash incentive awards in respect of company and/or operating group performance during fiscal ~~2015~~2021 under ~~the EPIP,~~our short-term cash incentive program, which is described above under"“—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—~~Short-Term~~Short-Term/Annual Incentive Compensation."” Based on our strong fiscal 2021 financial performance, each NEO earned the maximum cash incentive award for which s/he was eligible.

(2)

~~(2)~~

Reflects ~~potential restricted~~performance-based RSUs granted under the LTIP. All of the awards vest on, or shortly after, May 31, 2024. These stock awards, ~~in respect of our performance during fiscal 2015 under~~including the ~~LTIP, which is~~vesting schedule, are described above under "“——Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.”

(3)

Reflects service-based restricted shares granted under the LTIP. All of the awards cliff vest on May 31, 2024, except for a one-time grant of 2,000 service-based restricted shares to Ms. Kelly that vested on April 8, 2022. These stock awards are described above under “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.”

(4)

~~(3)~~

The values for stock awards in this column are computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. ~~For~~Information about the assumptions used to value these awards ~~with performance conditions,~~can be found under the ~~grant date fair value assumes achievement at target performance. Pursuant to SEC regulations, no reduction has been applied for estimated forfeitures.~~

caption “Equity Compensation” in Notes 1 and 8 in our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Table of Contents~~

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal ~~2015~~2021 Year-End

The following table provides information with respect to unvested equity awards held by our NEOs as of January ~~30, 2016.~~29, 2022. Our NEOs did not hold any unexercised stock options at the end of fiscal ~~2015.~~

2021.

	Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(3)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(4)
Thomas C. Chubb III		33,099		2,679,364		9,307		753,402
K. Scott Grassmyer		12,365		1,000,947		3,398		275,068
Thomas E. Campbell		12,365		1,000,947		3,398		275,068
Michelle M. Kelly		16,429		1,329,928		2,972		240,583
Douglas B. Wood		13,569		1,098,411		3,757		304,129

Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)⁽¹⁾ Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)⁽²⁾
Thomas C. Chubb III
31,319 2,187,945
K. Scott Grassmyer
11,884 830,216
Scott A. Beaumont
4,097 286,216
Thomas E. Campbell
11,884 830,216
Terry R. Pillow
27,075 1,891,460

(1)

The unvested equity awards held by our NEOs at the end of fiscal ~~2015~~2021 consist of ~~performance-based restricted share units awarded in respect of fiscal 2012 performance,~~various three year service-based restricted ~~shares granted in March 2014,~~shares; performance-based restricted shares ~~awarded in March 2015 in respect of fiscal 2014 performance, and performance-based restricted shares awarded in March 2016 in respect of actual fiscal 2015 performance (all which~~(which are subject to additional service requirements prior to vesting); and special, limited service-based restricted shares granted to Ms. Kelly in March 2021, as follows:

	Thomas C. Chubb III			• 4,800 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2019 that vested on April 8, 2022 • 10,719 performance-based restricted shares granted following the conclusion of the end of fiscal 2019 in respect of actual fiscal 2019 performance that vested on April 8, 2022 • 11,365 service-based restricted shares granted in June 2020 that vest on July 28, 2023 • 6,215 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2021 that vest on May 31, 2024
	K. Scott Grassmyer			• 1,800 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2019 that vested on April 8, 2022 • 4,020 performance-based restricted shares granted following the conclusion of the end of fiscal 2019 in respect of actual fiscal 2019 performance that vested on April 8, 2022 • 4,545 service-based restricted shares granted in June 2020 that vest on July 28, 2023 • 2,000 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2021 that vest on May 31, 2024
	Thomas E. Campbell			• 1,800 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2019 that vested on April 8, 2022 • 4,020 performance-based restricted shares granted following the conclusion of the end of fiscal 2019 in respect of actual fiscal 2019 performance that vested on April 8, 2022 • 4,545 service-based restricted shares granted in June 2020 that vest on July 28, 2023 • 2,000 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2021 that vest on May 31, 2024

Name
Fiscal 2012
RSUs Vesting Date
for Fiscal
2012 RSUs Fiscal 2014
Service-Based
Restricted
Shares Fiscal 2014
Performance-
Based
Restricted Shares Vesting Date for
Fiscal 2014
Service-Based and
Performance-
Based
Restricted
Shares Fiscal 2015
Performance-
Based
Restricted
Shares Vesting Date
for Fiscal
2015
Performance-
Based
Restricted
Shares
Thomas C. Chubb III
6,553 March 31, 2016 3,300 10,692 April 14, 2017 10,774 April 16, 2018
K. Scott Grassmyer
2,663 March 31, 2016 1,650 3,771 April 14, 2017 3,800 April 16, 2018
Scott A. Beaumont
4,097 March 31, 2016 — — — — —
Thomas E. Campbell
2,663 March 31, 2016 1,650 3,771 April 14, 2017 3,800 April 16, 2018
Terry R. Pillow
8,738 March 31, 2016 3,300 7,490 April 14, 2017 7,547 April 16, 2018

38 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS Michelle M. Kelly • 1,560 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2019 that vested on April 8, 2022 • 3,484 performance-based restricted shares granted following the conclusion of the end of fiscal 2019 in respect of actual fiscal 2019 performance that vested on April 8, 2022 • 2,000 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2021 that vested on April 8, 2022 • 7,385 service-based restricted shares granted in June 2020 that vest on July 28, 2023 • 2,000 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2021 that vest on May 31, 2024 Douglas B. Wood • 1,560 service-based restricted shares granted in March 2019 that vested on April 8, 2022 • 3,484 performance-based restricted shares granted following the conclusion of the end of fiscal 2019 in respect of actual fiscal 2019 performance that vested on April 8, 2022 • 8,525 service-based restricted shares granted in June 2020 that vest on July 28, 2023 (2)

The market value of stock awards reported is computed by multiplying the number of shares of stock that have not vested by ~~$69.86,~~$80.95, the per-share closing price of our common stock on January ~~30, 2016.~~28, 2022.

(3)

~~Option Exercises~~The unearned equity awards at the end of fiscal 2021 consist of performance-based RSUs awarded in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021 pursuant to our LTIP as follows:

Fiscal 2020 Award
(target # of RSUs
under award) Fiscal 2021 Award
(target # of RSUs
under award)
Thomas C. Chubb III 22,725 14,500
K. Scott Grassmyer 9,090 4,500
Thomas E. Campbell 9,090 4,500
Michelle M. Kelly 7,385 4,500
Douglas B. Wood 8,525 6,500
The actual number of RSUs earned will range from 0% to 200% of the target award, based on our TSR relative to the TSRs of the peer companies in our comparator group during the three-year performance period ending July 13, 2023 for the fiscal 2020 awards and May 3, 2024 for the fiscal 2021 awards. In accordance with Item 402(f) of Regulation S-K, the unearned equity awards at the end of fiscal 2021 are reported assuming achievement at threshold performance, as described above under “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021.”
(4)
The market value of unearned equity awards reported is computed by multiplying the number of RSUs that would be earned based on threshold performance, which is 25% of the target number of RSUs awarded, by $80.95, the per-share closing price of our common stock on January 28, 2022.

Stock Vested During Fiscal ~~2015~~2021

The following table provides information concerning the vesting of restricted stock for each of our NEOs during fiscal 2021. The table reports the number of shares of stock that vested and the aggregate dollar value realized upon vesting of stock.

	Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1)
Thomas C. Chubb III		14,000		1,236,200
K. Scott Grassmyer		5,000		441,500
Thomas E. Campbell		5,000		441,500
Michelle M. Kelly		11,700		1,033,110
Douglas B. Wood		5,200		459,160

(1)

The dollar amount is determined by multiplying the number of shares of our common stock vested by the per-share closing price of our common stock of $88.30 on April 9, 2021, the vesting date for these awards.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

There were no stock options exercised ~~or restricted shares that vested for~~by any of our NEOs during fiscal ~~2015.~~

2021.

Fiscal ~~2015~~2021 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

The following table shows the activity under our Deferred Compensation Plan for each of our participating NEOs during fiscal ~~2015.~~

2021.

Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)(1)		Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)(2)		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)(3)		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)(4)(5)
Thomas C. Chubb III		17,928		23,580		19,509		—		759,707
K. Scott Grassmyer		27,781		6,544		22,604		—		674,881
Thomas E. Campbell		4,546		6,544		49,088		(27,297)		1,093,548
Douglas B. Wood		120,470		18,233		449,645		—		4,232,473

Name
Executive
Contributions in
Last FY
($)⁽¹⁾ Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY
($)⁽²⁾ Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($) Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)⁽³⁾ Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE
($)⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾
Thomas C. Chubb III
16,274 47,644 3,962 9,364 286,186
K. Scott Grassmyer
18,157 11,111 (15,140 ) — 254,814
Scott A. Beaumont
— — — — —
Thomas E. Campbell
22,038 11,111 (44,494 ) 13,292 615,614
Terry R. Pillow
8,833 33,406 1,262 — 352,041

(1)

The amounts reported in this column are also included in the ~~"Salary" column or the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column for fiscal 2015 in the~~ Summary Compensation Table above.

(2)

~~(2)~~

The amounts reported in this column are also included in the ~~"All~~“All Other ~~Compensation"~~Compensation” column for fiscal ~~2015~~2021 in the Summary Compensation Table above.

(3)

~~(3)~~

Represent in-service distributions received in accordance with the terms of our Deferred Compensation Plan.

(4)

~~Table of Contents~~

~~(4)~~: Reflects balances as of January ~~30, 2016.~~29, 2022.

(5)

~~(5)~~

The amounts reported in this column include amounts that are also reported as salary, non-equity incentive plan awards or all other compensation in the Summary Compensation Table above in fiscal ~~2015~~2021 and in prior years as follows:

Name	Amount Included in Both Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and Summary Compensation Table ($)		Amount Included in Both Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and Previously Reported in Prior Years’ Summary Compensation Table ($)		Total Amounts Included in Both Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and Current Year or Prior Years’ Summary Compensation Table ($)
Thomas C. Chubb III		41,508		710,219		751,727
K. Scott Grassmyer		34,325		335,046		369,371
Thomas E. Campbell		11,090		500,990		512,080
Douglas B. Wood		138,703		723,223		861,926

Name
Amount Included in
Both Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation Table
and Summary
Compensation Table
($) Amount Included in
Both Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation Table
and Previously
Reported in
Prior Years' Summary
Compensation Table
($) Total Amounts
Included in
Both Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
Table and
Current Year or
Prior Years' Summary
Compensation Table
($)
Thomas C. Chubb III
63,918 308,249 372,167
K. Scott Grassmyer
29,268 111,836 141,104
Scott A. Beaumont
— — —
Thomas E. Campbell
33,149 291,966 325,115
Terry R. Pillow
42,240 314,681 356,921

~~Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants may elect to have contributions during a given calendar year distributed as either:~~

•: ~~in-service distributions starting at least two years following the year of the applicable contributions in a single sum or in annual installment payments over a period of up to five years; or~~
•: following a deemed retirement (which occurs when a participant reaches age 55 with at least five years of service) generally in a single sum or in annual installment payments over a period of up to 15 years.

Distribution of account balances in a single sum is automatically made on termination for reasons other than a deemed retirement. Participants elect to invest their account balances among a variety of investment options in an array of asset classes, and earnings are based on the equivalent returns from the elected investment options. Accounts are 100% vested at all times.

Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control

~~LTIP Awards~~

~~The fiscal 2015~~Our NEOs are employed “at-will” and we have not entered into employment agreements or severance agreements with any of our NEOs. All of our NEOs’ outstanding equity awards ~~described under~~~~"—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation"~~ ~~above (as well as our fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2014 equity awards outstanding as of January 30, 2016),~~ provide for ~~"double trigger"~~“double trigger” vesting, meaning that the awards require a change of control of our company and a termination of the ~~individual's~~individual’s employment either by the individual for ~~good reason~~“good reason” or us or our acquiror without ~~cause (which~~“cause” (which we refer to as a ~~"change~~“change of control ~~termination"~~termination”) to accelerate ~~vesting.~~vesting, except as described in this paragraph below. Performance-based RSUs issued to our NEOs in June 2020 and March 2021 are not subject to “double trigger” acceleration of vesting in the event such awards are neither continued following a change of control nor assumed or converted by the successor entity. If such awards are terminated in connection with a change of control and not assumed or converted by the successor entity, the unvested equity awards would accelerate and vest as of the date of such change of control as follows: (i) if such change of control occurred within the first year of the three-year performance period, the target number of RSUs subject to the awards would vest, (ii) if such change of control occurred after the first year of the three-year performance period but prior to end of the applicable performance period, the number of RSUs that would vest would be determined based on our actual TSR relative to the TSR of our comparative peer group for the applicable performance period as if the applicable performance period had ended on the date of such change of control and (iii) if the change of control occurred on or after the end of the applicable performance period but prior to the date on which such awards would vest, the number of RSUs that would vest would be determined based on our actual TSR relative to the TSR of our comparative peer group for the applicable performance period.

40 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table summarizes the value of the shares of our common stock that would be realized by each NEO if a change of control termination had occurred on January ~~30, 2016 (which for this purpose assumes~~29, 2022:

Name	Equity Awards That Would Vest upon a Change of Control Termination (#)(1)(2)		Value Realized on Vesting Following a Change of Control Termination ($)(3)
Thomas C. Chubb III		70,324		5,692,728
K. Scott Grassmyer		25,955		2,101,057
Thomas E. Campbell		25,955		2,101,057
Michelle M. Kelly		28,314		2,292,018
Douglas B. Wood		28,594		2,314,684

(1)

For details on the outstanding equity awards that ~~the~~would vest upon a change of control ~~of our company occurred prior to the end of fiscal 2015):~~

Name
Fiscal 2012
RSUs That
Would Vest
upon a Change
of Control
Termination (#) Fiscal 2014
Performance-Based
Equity Awards
That Would
Vest upon
a Change of
Control
Termination
(#) Fiscal 2014
Service-Based
Restricted
Shares That
Would Vest
upon
a Change of
Control
Termination
(#) Fiscal 2015
Performance-Based
Equity Awards
That Would
Vest upon
a Change of
Control
Termination
(#)⁽¹⁾ Value Realized
on Vesting
Following
a Change of Control
Termination
($)⁽²⁾
Thomas C. Chubb III
6,553 10,692 3,300 10,774 2,187,945
K. Scott Grassmyer
2,663 3,771 1,650 3,800 830,216
Scott A. Beaumont
4,097 — — — 286,216
Thomas E. Campbell
2,663 3,771 1,650 3,800 830,216
Terry R. Pillow
8,738 7,490 3,300 7,547 1,891,460

termination, see Footnotes 1 and 3 under “—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2021 Year-End.”

~~(1)~~

(2)

Pursuant to the terms of ~~the~~our fiscal ~~2015 program,~~2020 and fiscal 2021 performance-based equity programs, if a change of control termination takes place where (a) the change of control occurs prior to completion of the ~~end~~first year of ~~fiscal 2015,~~the three-year performance period, the individual recipients would be entitled to receive ~~the greater of (a)~~ the number of shares of our common stock attributable to the ~~recipient's~~recipient’s target number of ~~restricted shares~~performance-based RSUs pursuant to the program, orand (b) the ~~actual~~change of control occurs after the first year of the three-year performance period but prior to end of the applicable performance period, the number of ~~restricted~~

~~Table~~shares of ~~Contents~~

our common stock which the individual recipients would be entitled to receive would be the greater of (i) the target number of performance-based RSUs pursuant to the award or (ii) the number of shares ~~certified by~~of our ~~compensation committee~~common stock which the individual would be entitled to pursuant to the award if the performance period ended as ~~having~~of the date of the change of control termination. As the full performance period for the fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021 performance-based equity awards had not been ~~earned. Accordingly,~~concluded as of the end of fiscal 2021, the table ~~assumes~~includes the ~~actual~~target number of ~~restricted~~ shares ~~certified by~~of our ~~compensation committee~~common stock pursuant to the fiscal 2021 program for each recipient, as ~~having been earned~~reflected as target under “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021”, which would ~~vest.~~

~~(2)~~: be the minimum number of shares the recipient would be entitled to receive in the event of a qualifying change of control termination.

(3)

The value is computed by multiplying the number of shares that would vest by ~~$69.86,~~$80.95, the per-share closing market price of our common stock on January ~~30, 2016.~~28, 2022.

~~Other Potential Post-Employment Payments~~

~~Executive Medical Insurance Plan; Other Benefit and Welfare Plans.~~ ~~Upon termination~~As of ~~employment, our NEOs are not eligible to continue participation under~~ the ~~Executive Medical Plan and our other benefit and welfare plans (subject to rights to participate in continuation coverage).~~

~~General.~~ Weend of fiscal 2021, we did not have any other arrangement, policy or plan that would provide payments or benefits to any of our NEOs as a result of a termination of any kind, including following a change of control, other than benefits payable to salaried employees of our company on a non-discriminatory basis.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Chubb, to that of our median-paid employee. The pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

To identify our median-paid employee for fiscal 2021, we examined the 2021 total compensation for all individuals, excluding our CEO, who were employed by us on December 31, 2021. For purposes of this calculation: we excluded approximately 3% of our workforce located in foreign jurisdictions under the de minimis exception to the pay ratio rule; for all employees based in foreign jurisdictions who were included in our determination of the median-paid employee, we applied a foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rate based on the average daily rate during the 12 months ended December 31, 2021; we elected not to annualize the compensation paid to employees who were not employed for all of 2021 (e.g., new hires); we included full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees for purposes of determining the median-paid employee; and we used gross earnings (or foreign equivalent amounts), meaning total amounts paid before deductions or adjustments, including wages, overtime, bonuses and the value of any equity awards that vested during the 2021 calendar year.

The median-paid employee used for purposes of this fiscal 2021 comparison was a non-exempt, retail employee located in the U.S. with total compensation for fiscal 2021 of $23,527, calculated in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K. The annual total compensation for fiscal 2021 for our Chief Executive Officer was $4,765,870, as discussed above under “—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2021.” Based on this information, for fiscal 2021, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the annual total compensation of our median-paid employee was 203 to 1.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We believe the pay ratio disclosure presented in this section is a reasonable estimate. Because the SEC’s rules for identifying the median-paid employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to use different methodologies, assumptions, adjustments and estimates, our pay ratio disclosure may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies. This information under “CEO Pay Ratio” is being provided solely for compliance purposes. Neither our compensation committee nor our management uses the pay ratio measure in making compensation decisions.

42 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOMINATING, COMPENSATION & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

~~In fulfilling its responsibilities, the~~

The Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the ~~Company's~~Company’s Compensation Discussion and ~~Analysis.~~Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on such review and discussions, the Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the ~~Company's~~Company’s Fiscal ~~2015~~2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Respectfully submitted,

Clarence H. Smith, Chairman
Helen Ballard
~~Dennis M. Love~~

Virginia A. Hepner
E. Jenner Wood III

This report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Helen Ballard, ~~Dennis M. Love,~~Virginia A. Hepner, Clarence H. Smith and E. Jenner Wood III served on our NC&G Committee during fiscal ~~2015.~~2021. None of them ~~are current officers~~was an officer or ~~employees~~employee of our company or any ~~subsidiary,~~of our subsidiaries during fiscal 2021; none of them are former officers of our company or any ~~subsidiary~~of our subsidiaries; and none of them ~~has~~had any ~~other~~ relationship during fiscal 2021 requiring disclosure ~~by us~~ under any paragraph of Item 404 of Regulation ~~S-K, except for Mr. Wood, who~~S-K. In fiscal 2021, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that had one or more of its executive officers serving on our ~~NC&G Committee for only a short duration during fiscal 2015 and is employed by SunTrust Banks, Inc., as further described below under "~~Board or our compensation committee.~~Certain Relationships and Related Transactions~~."

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Our Board or Executive Committee reviews all transactions that are disclosable under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. To help identify these related party transactions, our Legal Department maintains a list of companies and other persons with whom each director and executive officer has a potentially disclosable relationship and each director and executive officer is annually ~~completes~~expected to complete a questionnaire that requires the disclosure of any transaction or relationship that the individual, or any member of his or her immediate family, has or will have with our company. Our Legal Department, with the assistance of other members of senior management, also reviews contemplated transactions to consider whether one of our directors or executive officers ~~or a company with which one of our directors or executive officers is~~(or an affiliated entity) proposes to engage in a transaction that our Board should review.

Our Board or Executive Committee will only approve related party transactions that are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of our company and our shareholders. In determining whether to approve or reject a related party transaction, our Board considers such information as it deems important to determine whether the transaction is on reasonable and competitive terms and is fair to our company.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~SunTrust; Mr. Wood~~

~~Mr. E. Jenner Wood III, one of our directors, is Corporate Executive Vice President of SunTrust Banks, Inc. An affiliate of SunTrust acted as lead arranger and bookrunner~~During fiscal 2021, there were no related party transactions requiring disclosure in ~~connection with our syndicated, revolving credit facility, and certain other subsidiaries of SunTrust act as agent and lender and provide other services under~~ this facility. In addition, during fiscal 2015, we engaged an affiliate of SunTrust to provide us certain financial advisory services for which we paid SunTrust an aggregate of $50,000 and expect no further payments under such arrangement. The loan under our credit facility was made in the ordinary course of business, was made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the lender and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. Our aggregate payments to SunTrust, including in respect of the foregoing financial advisory services, were approximately $600,000 during fiscal 2015, and these payments represented an immaterial percentage of the Company's and SunTrust's revenues in 2015. Mr. Wood does not personally participate in or benefit from any aspect of our relationship with SunTrust.

proxy statement.

AUDIT-RELATED MATTERS

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee, which operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors of Oxford Industries, Inc., is composed entirely of independent directors and, among other things, oversees, on behalf of the Board of Directors, the ~~Company's~~Company’s financial reporting process and system of internal control over financial reporting.

Pursuant to the Audit Committee’s charter, the committee is also charged with reviewing the Company’s guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including cybersecurity risks. The Audit Committee’s charter is posted under the “Corporate Governance Library” link under the “Investor Relations” tab on our website at www.oxfordinc.com. The Audit Committee held four meetings during the Company’s 2021 fiscal year.

The Company’s management is responsible for its financial reporting process, including its system of internal control over financial reporting, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for auditing the Company’s consolidated financial statements and providing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States, as well as attesting and reporting on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to oversee these processes, as well as to appoint, retain, compensate, evaluate and, when necessary, terminate the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. It is not the Audit Committee’s duty or responsibility to conduct auditing or accounting reviews or procedures.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Consequently, in carrying out its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee shall not be charged with, and is not providing, any expert or special assurance as to the Company’s financial statements, or any professional certification as to Ernst & Young LLP’s work.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:

•

reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP the audited financial statements included in the ~~Company's~~Company’s Fiscal ~~2015~~2021 Annual Report on Form ~~10-K;~~10-K and the reports of management and of Ernst & Young LLP on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of fiscal 2021 contained therein;

•

discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the ~~Company's independent registered public accounting firm, the~~ matters required to be discussed ~~under Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (~~~~Communications with Audit Committees~~~~), as amended~~ by the ~~AICPA Professional Standards, Vol. 1 AU Section 380, as adopted by~~applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight ~~Board in Rule 3200T, which includes, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of the fiscal 2015 financial statements;~~Board;

•

received from Ernst & Young LLP the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Ernst & Young ~~LLP's~~LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, ~~and~~ considered whether the independent ~~auditors'~~auditors’ provision of other non-audit services to the Company (which are set forth below under “—Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”) is compatible with the ~~auditors'~~auditors’ independence, and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence;

•

concluded that Ernst & Young LLP is independent from the Company and its management; and

•

based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the ~~Company's~~Company’s Fiscal ~~2015~~2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Respectfully Submitted,

~~George C. Guynn,~~

Dennis M. Love, Chairman
Thomas C. Gallagher
John R. Holder
Stephen S. Lanier
Milford W. McGuirt
Clyde C. Tuggle

~~Table~~This report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of ~~Contents~~

1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table summarizes certain fees that we paid in respect of each of fiscal ~~2015~~2021 and fiscal ~~2014~~2020 to Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, for professional services:

Fee Category	Fiscal 2021 ($)		Fiscal 2020 ($)		Description
Audit fees		1,829,766		1,760,974	Fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting; reviews of our consolidated quarterly financial statements included in Forms 10-Q filed with the SEC; statutory audits of subsidiaries; services related to assistance with implementation of new accounting rules and regulations; and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings
Audit-related fees		3,220		—	Fees for audit-related services such as compliance with rules and regulations applicable to accounting matters
Tax fees		96,077		92,728	Fees for tax compliance, planning and advisory services
All other fees		—			—
Total fees		1,929,063		1,853,702

Fee Category
Fiscal 2015 ($) Fiscal 2014 ($)
Audit fees
1,370,124 1,321,958
Audit-related fees
1,915 10,135
Tax fees
84,455 85,525
All other fees
— —

Total fees
1,456,494 1,417,618

~~Audit Fees.~~ "Audit fees" are fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial statements included in Forms 10-Q filed with the SEC, statutory audits of subsidiaries and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

~~Audit-Related Fees.~~ "Audit-related fees" are fees for audit-related services such as services related to assistance with implementation of recently adopted rules and regulations, compliance with rules and regulations applicable to accounting matters and audits performed pursuant to certain lease agreements.

~~Tax Fees.~~ ~~"Tax fees" are fees for tax compliance, planning and advisory services, including fees associated with tax planning and related advisory services associated with business acquisitions.~~

~~The Audit Committee considered the effects that the provision of the services described above under the subheadings~~~~"Audit-related fees"~~ ~~and~~~~"Tax fees"~~ ~~may have on the auditors' independence and has determined that such independence has been maintained.~~

~~Audit Committee Pre-Approval~~Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

Our Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Unless a service to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm has received general pre-approval under the policy, it requires specific pre-approval by our Audit Committee or the chair of our Audit Committee before the commencement of the service. The pre-approval policy is detailed as to the particular services to be provided, and our Audit Committee is to be informed about each service provided.

Specific pre-approval is required for significant recurring annual engagements, such as engagements for the required annual audit and quarterly reviews (including the audit of internal control over financial reporting) and statutory ~~or employee benefit plan~~ audits. Any

44 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

individual engagement with an estimated cost of more than $75,000 must be specifically pre-approved before the commencement of the engagement, even if the service in question has received general pre-approval. In addition, further Audit Committee pre-approval is required if the aggregate fees for such engagements would exceed $200,000. At each Audit Committee meeting, the entire Audit Committee reviews services (including the nature and doller value of such services) performed since the prior meeting pursuant to the general pre-approvals granted under the policy, as well as services, if any, pre-approved by the chair of our Audit Committee.

~~The nature~~

All of the services described above under ‘‘Audit Fees,’’ ‘‘Audit-related fees’’ and ~~dollar value of services performed under the general pre-approval guidelines are reviewed with~~‘‘Tax fees’’ were approved by our Audit Committee ~~on at least an annual basis. All of the fees detailed above paid to Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 were pre-approved (either specifically or~~ pursuant to legal requirements and the ~~general pre-approvals granted under the policy) by our Audit Committee.~~

committee’s charter and pre-approval policy.

~~Table of Contents~~

COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP BY MANAGEMENT
AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

Management

~~Management~~

The table below sets forth certain information as of April ~~15, 2016 (except as noted),~~14, 2022 regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by our directors, ~~and director nominee;~~ our ~~NEOs;~~NEOs and our directors ~~director nominee~~ and executive officers as a group. Except as set forth below, the shareholders named below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as being beneficially owned by them. ~~Unless otherwise indicated, the~~The address for each ~~shareholder on~~individual in this table is c/o Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, Georgia 30309.

Beneficial Ownership of
Common Stock

Name

Number of
Shares(1)(2)

Percent of
Class(1)

Helen Ballard

14,229

Thomas E. Campbell

32,941

Thomas C. Chubb III(3)

120,845

Thomas C. Gallagher

16,014

K. Scott Grassmyer

32,473

Virginia A. Hepner

7,161

John R. Holder

31,254

Michelle M. Kelly

39,777

Stephen S. Lanier(4)

539,765

3.3%

Dennis M. Love

20,122

Milford W. McGuirt

2,525

Clarence H. Smith

16,864

Clyde C. Tuggle

12,738

Douglas B. Wood

41,656

E. Jenner Wood III

17,011

All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)

956,963

5.9%

Beneficial Ownership of
Common Stock
Name
Number of
Shares⁽¹⁾ Percent of
Class⁽¹⁾
Helen Ballard
7,583 *
Scott A. Beaumont
4,902 ^(a) *
Thomas E. Campbell
37,612 *
Thomas C. Chubb III
97,551 *
Thomas C. Gallagher
9,368 *
K. Scott Grassmyer
34,430 *
George C. Guynn
10,536 *
Virginia A. Hepner
1,000 *
John R. Holder
15,981 *
J. Reese Lanier
214,495 ^(b) 1.28
Dennis M. Love
14,812 *
Mark Maidment
0 ^(c) *
Terry R. Pillow
34,933 ^(d) *
Clarence H. Smith
11,915 *
Clyde C. Tuggle
3,992 *
E. Jenner Wood III
12,515 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)
532,071 ^(e)(f) 3.18

*

Less than 1%

(1)

~~(1)~~

Calculations based on an aggregate of ~~16,755,551~~16,345,358 shares of our common stock outstanding as of the close of business on April ~~15, 2016.~~14, 2022. The number of shares and percentage of the class beneficially owned ~~excludes unvested restricted share units awarded to our executive officers for which the individual does not have any voting rights but does~~ include unvested restricted shares for which the individual has voting rights as of the close of business on April ~~15, 2016. The~~14, 2022.

(2)

Shares reported exclude unvested ~~restricted share units and restricted shares held~~RSUs granted to executive officers by our ~~NEOs are disclosed above under "~~NC&G Committee.

(3)

~~Executive Compensation—Compensation Tables—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2015 Year-End~~."

~~(a)~~

Mr. Beaumont served as an executive officer of our company until the conclusion of fiscal 2015 and continued to serve as CEO of our Lilly Pulitzer Group until April 1, 2016, when he retired. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers, among others, file with the SEC certain reports with respect to such person's beneficial ownership of our equity securities. Mr. Beaumont's obligation to file such reports pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act generally terminated on January 30, 2016. Information regarding Mr. Beaumont's beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock is based on information filed by Mr. Beaumont with the SEC through January 30, 2016, as well as additional information known to our company with respect to the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units on March 31, 2016.

~~(b)~~

Consists of ~~126,096~~58,636 shares held individually by Mr. ~~J. Reese~~Chubb and 62,209 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Chubb is the trustee.

(4)

Consists of 76,068 shares held individually by Mr. Lanier, ~~51,899~~10,048 shares held in a trust of which Mr. Lanier is the primary beneficiary, 35,484 shares held in custodial accounts for the benefit of Mr. Lanier’s children, 860 shares held by Mr. Lanier’s wife and 417,305 shares held by a charitable foundation offor which Mr. Lanier ~~is a trustee, 36,000 shares held in a charitable remainder trust of which Mr. Lanier acts as trustee, and 500 shares held by Mr. Lanier's wife.~~has voting authority. Mr. Lanier disclaims beneficial ownership of the ~~reported~~ shares held by ~~the~~such charitable ~~foundation and by his wife, and except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein, disclaims beneficial ownership of the reported shares held by the charitable remainder trust.~~foundation.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~(c)~~: Mr. Maidment served as CEO of our Ben Sherman Group until July 17, 2015, when his employment with our company ended in connection with our sale of substantially all of the assets and operations of our former Ben Sherman Group. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers, among others, file with the SEC certain reports with respect to such person's beneficial ownership of our equity securities. Accordingly, Mr. Maidment's obligation to file such reports pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act generally terminated on July 17, 2015. Information regarding Mr. Maidment's beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock is based on information known to our company as of July 17, 2015.
~~(d)~~: Mr. Pillow served as an executive officer of our company until the conclusion of fiscal 2015 when he retired as CEO of our Tommy Bahama Group. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers, among others, file with the SEC certain reports with respect to such person's beneficial ownership of our equity securities. Mr. Pillow's obligation to file such reports pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act generally terminated on January 30, 2016. Information regarding Mr. Pillow's beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock is based on information filed by Mr. Pillow with the SEC through January 30, 2016, as well as additional information known to our company with respect to the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units on March 31, 2016.
~~(e)~~: The number of shares and percentage of the class beneficially owned by all directors and executive officers as a group exclude shares beneficially owned by Messrs. Beaumont, Maidment and Pillow because they were not executive officers of our company on April 15, 2016.
~~(f)~~: ~~Of this amount, the executive officers not listed by name hold an aggregate of 61,281 shares.~~

Certain Beneficial Owners

The table below sets forth certain information ~~as of April 15, 2016 (except as noted),~~ regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by ~~owners of~~persons we believe beneficially hold more than 5% ~~or more of our common stock. Except as set forth below, the shareholders named below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares~~ of our common stock ~~shown as being beneficially owned by them.~~

based solely on a review of SEC filings made in respect of ownership.

Beneficial Ownership of
Common Stock
Name
Number of
Shares⁽¹⁾ Percent of
Class⁽¹⁾
BlackRock, Inc.
1,449,203 ^(a) 8.65
J. Hicks Lanier
1,208,638 ^(b) 7.21
The Vanguard Group
1,139,959 ^(c) 6.80

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 45

TABLE OF CONTENTS Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock Name and Address Number of Shares(1) Percent of Class(1) BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 2,637,975(2) 16.1% The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 1,937,679(3) 11.9% (1)

Calculations based on an aggregate of ~~16,755,551~~16,345,358 shares of our common stock outstanding as of the close of business on April ~~15, 2016.~~14, 2022.

(2)

~~(a)~~

The shares reported are held by BlackRock, Inc. ~~("BlackRock")~~ in its capacity as a parent holding company or control person in accordance with Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G) of the Securities Exchange ~~Act. As reported by BlackRock, various persons have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt~~Act of ~~dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale~~1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of ~~the reported shares.~~December 31, 2021. BlackRock reported sole voting power over ~~1,406,733~~2,578,124 of the reported shares and sole dispositive power over all of the reported shares. ~~The address for~~As reported by BlackRock, ~~is 40 East 52~~^nd ~~Street, New York, NY 10022.~~one of the persons on behalf of which BlackRock holds the reported shares, iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, has an interest in more than 5% of our common stock. This information ~~was as of December 31, 2015 and~~ was obtained from a Schedule ~~13G/A~~13G filed on ~~January 27, 2016.~~February 7, 2022.

(3)

~~(b)~~

~~This information is based on correspondence with Mr. Lanier's financial advisors and those of a charitable trust of which he serves as trustee, and reflect ownership as of December 31, 2015.~~

~~(c)~~

The shares reported are held by The Vanguard Group ~~("Vanguard")~~ in its capacity as an investment adviser in accordance with Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E) of the Exchange ~~Act.~~Act as of December 31, 2021. Vanguard reported ~~sole voting power over 32,058 of the reported shares,~~ shared voting power over ~~1,300~~15,046 of the reported shares, sole dispositive power over ~~1,107,501~~1,908,269 of the reported shares and shared dispositive power over ~~32,458~~29,410 of the reported shares. ~~The address for Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.~~ This information ~~was as of December 31, 2015 and~~ was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 10, ~~2015.~~2022.

~~Table of Contents~~

Under the ~~SEC's~~SEC’s rules, a person may be deemed to beneficially own securities in which he or she has no pecuniary interest. The information set forth in the tables above shall not be construed as an admission that any such person is, for purposes of Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act or otherwise, the beneficial owner of any securities disclosed above.

Delinquent Section 16(a) ~~Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance~~

~~Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our~~Reports

Under U.S. securities laws, directors, certain officers and ~~directors, and~~ persons ~~who beneficially own~~holding more than 10% of our common stock must report their initial ownership of our common stock and any changes in their ownership to the SEC. The SEC has designated specific due dates for these reports, and we must identify in this proxy statement those persons who did not file these reports when due. Based solely on our review of copies of the reports filed with the SEC ~~certain reports,~~ and ~~to furnish copies thereof to us, with respect to each such person's beneficial ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities. Due to~~ the ~~complexity of the SEC's reporting rules, our Legal Department undertakes to file such reports on behalf~~written representations of our directors and executive officers, and has instituted procedures to assist them with these obligations. Based on a review of the company's records and other information, except as otherwise noted in our 2015 proxy statement in connection with our 2015 annual meeting of shareholders, we believe that all ~~reports required by our directors and executive officers~~reporting requirements for fiscal 2021 were complied with, except that, (i) a late Form 4 was filed on May 4, 2021 on behalf of Mr. Stephen S. Lanier to report a ~~timely basis~~sale of shares of our common stock held in ~~fiscal 2015.~~

a trust of which Mr. Lanier was the beneficiary executed at the direction of the trustee, who subsequently advised Mr. Lanier that the sale had been executed without his knowledge or direction and (ii) due to a communication error on the part of the Company, a late Form 5 was filed on March 22, 2022 on behalf of Mr. Dennis M. Love to report a charitable gift of 1,200 shares of our common stock.

46 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information concerning our equity compensation plans as of January ~~30, 2016:~~

29, 2022:

Plan Category	(a) Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1)		(b) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Employee Stock Purchase Plan(2)		—		312,233
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan		499,769		175,608
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—
Total				487,841

Plan Category
(a)
Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and Rights⁽¹⁾ (b)
Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

Employee Stock Purchase Plan⁽²⁾
— 464,583
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan
49,001 ⁽³⁾ 1,117,921
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
— —
Total
49,001 ⁽³⁾ 1,582,504

(1): As of January 30, 2016, we had no outstanding options, warrants or other rights with respect to shares of our common stock that require payment to us from the holder in exchange for the issuance of shares of our common stock.

Includes performance-based RSUs assuming achievement at maximum performance. Performance-based RSUs do not have an associated exercise price. Accordingly, information relating to the exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights is not included in this table.

(2)

~~(2)~~

The number of securities to be issued under our ~~ESPP~~Employee Stock Purchase Plan is not determinable as of any date other than the last day of the applicable quarterly purchase period since the weighted average purchase price under ~~our ESPP~~the plan is not determinable as of any date other than the last day of the applicable quarterly purchase period.

~~(3)~~

~~Reflects~~ Information about our Employee Stock Purchase Plan can be found under the ~~number of~~caption “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” in Note 8 to our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING

Shares Outstanding

You may vote at our 2022 annual meeting if you owned shares of our common stock ~~that,~~ as of ~~January 30, 2016, were to be granted pursuant to restricted share units granted under our LTIP.~~

~~PROPOSALS FOR SHAREHOLDER CONSIDERATION~~

~~Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors~~

~~Board of Directors~~

In accordance with our articles of incorporation, our directors are divided into three classes that are as nearly equal in size as possible. Directors in each class are elected to three-year terms, with director classes serving staggered terms. A director holds office until the annual meeting of shareholders held in the year during which the director's term ends and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Bylaws Relating to Retirement~~

~~Director Nominees~~

Our Board currently consists of three Class I directors (Messrs. J. Reese Lanier, Dennis M. Love and Clyde C. Tuggle), three Class II directors (Messrs. Thomas C. Chubb III, John R. Holder, and Clarence H. Smith) and four Class III directors (Ms. Helen Ballard, Mr. Thomas C. Gallagher, Mr. George C. Guynn and Mr. E. Jenner Wood III).

~~At our 2016 annual shareholders meeting, the terms of our Class III directors will expire. Mr. George C. Guynn is retiring from the Board effective at the conclusion of the annual meeting.~~

Our Board, on the recommendation of our NC&G Committee, has nominated each of Ms. Helen Ballard, Mr. Thomas C. Gallagher, Ms. Virginia A. Hepner, and Mr. E. Jenner Wood III for election at our annual meeting as Class III directors, each to serve for a three year term expiring in 2019 and until his or her respective successor is elected and qualified.

The terms of our Class I directors expire in 2017, and the terms of our Class II directors expire in 2018. Each of our Class I and Class II directors is expected to remain in office for the remainder of his or her respective term.

~~Required Vote~~

In an uncontested election at an annual meeting of shareholders, our bylaws require that each director be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director (number of shares voted "for" a director must exceed the number of votes cast "against" that director). In accordance with our bylaws, in order for a shareholder to have nominated a director for consideration at the 2016 annual shareholders meeting, we must have received the nomination not later than the close of business on ~~March 19, 2016.~~April 14, 2022, the record date for the annual meeting. As of April 14, 2022, there were 16,345,358 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. You are entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock that you owned on the record date.

Participating in the Meeting

Shareholders may access the annual meeting webcast, submit questions and electronically vote shares at the meeting by visiting www.meetnow.global/MSPW2TH. The live audio webcast of the annual meeting will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time. We ~~have not received~~encourage shareholders to access the webcast in advance of the designated start time.

If your shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with Computershare, our transfer agent, then you are a shareholder ~~nomination for~~of record. As a ~~director for consideration at~~shareholder of record, you may access the ~~2016 annual~~meeting webcast using the instructions and voter control number set forth in the Notice of Internet Availability.

If, like most of our shareholders, ~~meeting. Accordingly, the election~~your shares of ~~directors at the 2016 annual shareholders meeting is an uncontested election.~~

~~Under Georgia law, if,~~Oxford common stock are held in an ~~uncontested election~~account with a broker, you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. If your shares are held in an account with a broker and you wish to participate in the annual meeting, you must register in advance to participate in the meeting webcast and obtain a new control number from Computershare, our transfer agent. You may request registration by submitting proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your holdings of our common stock, along with your name and email address, to Computershare. Requests for registration may be directed to Computershare (i) by mail to the following address: Computershare, Oxford Industries, Inc. Legal Proxy, P.O. Box 43001, Providence, RI 02940-3001; or (ii) by email, by attaching an image of your legal proxy or forwarding the email from your broker to legalproxy@computershare.com. Requests for registration must be labeled “Legal Proxy” and received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 7, 2022. You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after your registration materials have been received.

Voting

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote using one of the following methods:

•

by voting on the Internet in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice of Internet Availability;

•

after requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials, by signing and returning a proxy card or voting by telephone; or

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

by participating in the annual meeting and voting electronically at the annual ~~meeting,~~meeting.

If you are a ~~nominee who is already serving~~shareholder of record and you sign and return your proxy card but do not include voting instructions, your proxy will be voted as ~~a director is not elected, the director would continue to serve on~~recommended by our Board ~~as a "holdover director." Under our bylaws, any holdover director who fails to be elected by a majority~~or, if no recommendation is given, in the discretion of the ~~votes cast with respect~~proxies designated on the proxy card, to ~~such director~~the extent permitted under applicable law.

However, if you are a shareholder of record, your shares will not be voted unless you submit a proxy (which can be accomplished by voting on the Internet, by telephone or by signing and returning a proxy card, as noted above) or participate in the annual meeting webcast and vote electronically at the meeting.

If your shares are held in an ~~uncontested election must offer to tender his or her resignation to our Board. Our Board, in consultation~~account with ~~any~~a broker, the broker holding your account is considered the shareholder of its committees so designated, would then determine whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. Under our bylaws, our Board is required to act on the resignation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. Ms. Ballard, Mr. Gallagher, and Mr. Wood are currently serving on our Board.

~~If a nominee who was not already serving as a director is not elected~~record for purposes of voting at the annual ~~meeting, that nominee would not become~~meeting. As a ~~director and would not serve~~beneficial owner, you may direct your broker on ~~our Board~~how to vote the shares in your account. Telephone and/or Internet voting may be available to direct your broker on how to vote the shares in your account, but the availability of Directors as a "holdover director." Ms. Hepner is not currently serving as a director. If Ms. Hepner fails to be elected by a majority of the votes cast, she would not be elected to our Board of Directors and theretelephone and/or Internet voting will be an additional vacancy on our Board of Directors; in that event, our Board of Directors may: (1) immediately fill the additional vacancy; (2) allow the vacancy to remain open until a suitable candidate is located and elected to serve on our Board of Directors; or (3) amend our bylaws to reduce the number of directors serving on our Board of Directors.

~~Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect~~depend on the ~~vote for~~voting processes of that firm. Please follow the ~~election of directors. Proxies cannot be voted for~~directions on your proxy card or voting instruction form carefully. Even if your shares are held in an account with a ~~greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.~~

Each nominee has consented to serve if elected, and our Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unwilling or unable to serve prior to the annual meeting, then at the recommendation of our Board: (1) proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee selected by or at the direction of our Board; (2) the vacancy created by the inability or unwillingness of a nominee to serve will remain open until filled by our Board; or (3) our bylaws may be amended to reduce the number of directors serving on our Board.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Recommendation of our Board of Directors~~

~~OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF MS. HELEN BALLARD, MR. THOMAS C. GALLAGHER, MS. VIRGINIA A. HEPNER AND MR. E. JENNER WOOD III AS A CLASS III DIRECTOR.~~

~~Proposal No. 2: Approval of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~

~~Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~

At the recommendation of our Audit Committee, our Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent auditors since May 2002. As of the date of this proxy statement, we have engaged Ernst & Young LLP to review our financial statements for the first three quarters of fiscal 2016 but we have not formally engaged an independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for fiscal 2016.

Our Board considers Ernst & Young LLP to be well qualified and recommends that our shareholders vote to approve their selection. Shareholder approval of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by law; however, our Board considers the solicitation of shareholder approval to be in our company's and our shareholders' best interests. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expectedbroker, you are invited to attend the annual meeting. ~~The representative will~~However, since you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote your shares electronically at the meeting unless you obtain a valid proxy card from your broker and, in order to gain access to the meeting webcast, register for the meeting with Computershare by following the instructions in “—Participating in the Meeting” above.

Broker Discretionary Voting; Broker Non-Votes

If you hold shares through an account with a broker, your shares may be ~~given~~voted by the ~~opportunity~~broker even if you do not provide voting instructions. Brokerage firms have the authority, under the NYSE’s rules, to ~~make a statement if he or she desires to~~vote shares in their discretion on certain “routine” matters when their customers do ~~so and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.~~

~~Required Vote~~

~~Approval of~~not provide voting instructions. Under the ~~selection~~NYSE’s rules, only Proposal No. 3 (ratification of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal ~~2016 requires the affirmative vote of at least~~2022) is considered a ~~majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present~~routine matter.

The other proposals to be addressed at the annual meeting ~~in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on~~are considered “non-routine” matters under the ~~proposal. Abstentions will have~~NYSE’s rules. When a brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from the same effect as a vote against this proposal. If at the annual meeting our shareholders do not approve the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016, our Board and Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016 and/or future years.

~~Recommendation of our Board of Directors~~

�� ~~OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP TO SERVE AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2016.~~

~~Proposal No. 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation~~

~~Executive Compensation~~

We are asking shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This "say-on-pay" proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our executive compensation practices. The vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

~~As further described above under "~~~~Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis~~," our executive compensation programs are designed to maintain a strong link between pay and performance for compensation paid to our named executive officers; align our named executive officers' interests with those of our shareholders by creating a strong focus on stock ownership; and ensure that we are able to attract and retain talented individuals who can deliver excellent business performance.

~~Proposed Resolution~~

~~We are asking our shareholders to vote on the following resolution at the annual meeting:~~

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Required Vote~~

~~Approval~~beneficial holder of the ~~say-on-pay resolution requires~~shares with respect to a non-routine matter, the ~~affirmative~~brokerage firm cannot vote ~~of at least~~the shares on that proposal. This is called a ~~majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Because broker~~“broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes ~~are~~will be counted as present at the annual meeting for quorum purposes but ~~are~~will not be counted as entitled to vote on ~~this proposal, they will have no effect~~the non-routine matter. Therefore, if your shares are held in an account with a broker, it is important that you provide voting instructions to your broker so that your vote on these proposals is counted.

Changing Your Vote

If your shares are held in an account with a broker, then you must follow the instructions provided by that firm in order to revoke or change your vote with respect to shares held in street name.

However, if you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke or change your vote with respect to the shares of our common stock that are registered directly in your name by doing any of the following:

•

delivering a written notice of revocation to our Secretary before the vote ~~on the resolution approving executive compensation. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.~~

~~The vote on this say-on-pay proposal~~ is advisory, and therefore the results of this proposal are not binding on our company, our NC&G Committee or our Board. The results of this proposal will not overrule any decision made by our Board or NC&G Committee. Our Board and our NC&G Committee value the input of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against this say-on-pay proposal, we will consider our shareholders' concerns and our NC&G Committee will evaluate whether any actions, in fiscal 2016 or in subsequent years, are necessary to address those concerns.

~~Recommendation of our Board of Directors~~

~~OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.~~

~~Other Matters~~

~~Our Board knows of no other matters that will be brought before the annual meeting, and our bylaws do not allow proposals to be presented~~taken at the annual meeting, ~~unless they were~~ such notice of revocation dated later than the proxy you want to revoke;

•

changing your vote using the Internet methods for voting described in the Notice of Internet Availability;

•

properly ~~presented to us prior to March 19, 2016. However, if any other question that requires~~executing and delivering a later-dated proxy before the vote is ~~properly presented~~taken at the ~~meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy as~~annual meeting;

•

if you have requested a printed copy of the proxy ~~holders will vote on such matters as recommended~~materials, voting by ~~our Board~~telephone; or ~~if no recommendation is given, in their discretion to the extent permitted under applicable law.~~

~~Approval of any other matter that properly comes before~~

•

voting electronically at the annual meeting ~~requires~~(your participation in the ~~affirmative vote~~annual meeting, in and of itself, will not revoke the earlier proxy).

Quorum

In order for us to conduct the annual meeting, the holders of a majority of the ~~outstanding~~ shares of our common stock ~~present at~~issued and outstanding as of the ~~annual meeting,~~record date must be present, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting. This is referred to as a quorum. Abstentions and ~~entitled to vote on~~broker non-votes, if any, will be counted as shares present at the ~~proposal (except as otherwise provided in our articles~~meeting for purposes of ~~incorporation or bylaws or applicable law for actions that require a greater percentage of votes in favor~~determining the presence of a ~~proposal).~~

quorum.

48 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Annual Report on Form 10-K

Our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K may be accessed through the date of the annual meeting by all shareholders under the “Investor Relations” tab of our website at www.oxfordinc.com. We will also provide without charge, at the written request of any shareholder of record as of April ~~15, 2016,~~14, 2022, a hard copy of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K, ~~for fiscal 2015,~~ including the audited financial statements, as filed with the SEC, excluding exhibits. We will provide copies of the exhibits if they are requested by eligible shareholders. We may impose a reasonable fee for providing the exhibits. Requests for copies of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K should be mailed to our ~~company's~~company’s headquarters at Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, Georgia 30309, Attention: Investor ~~Relations.~~

Relations or emailed to info@oxfordinc.com.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our Audit Committee actively engages management on potential strategies for reducing, eliminating or mitigating the risks to our organization. Our Audit Committee regularly reports to our Board on our ERM program, and our management at least annually provides our Board with a full report on our ERM program. In addition to our ERM program, our Board examines specific business risks in its regular reviews of our operating groups and also on a company-wide basis as part of its regular strategic reviews.

As part of its oversight of our overall compensation program, our NC&G Committee considers our compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may influence excessive risk taking. In particular, our compensation programs typically provide for short-term cash incentive payments to individuals throughout our company based on satisfaction of pre-established performance targets. For employees within our various operating groups, these performance targets may be based on performance by the operating group, as a whole, or a specific business unit or business location within that operating group. Each cash and/or equity incentive award for an individual employee within our organization is subject to a maximum amount that may be received by the individual. Our senior management and, with respect to our executive officers, our NC&G Committee, approve applicable performance targets taking into consideration our detailed, internal budgets for upcoming fiscal periods. These members of senior management have access to daily retail and ecommerce sales data and receive monthly financial reports, and they review and analyze deviations from the budgeted plans to assess whether, among other things, the deviations were the result of inappropriate risk taking. Our NC&G Committee has concluded that our compensation policies and procedures are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

Submission of Director Candidates by Shareholders

Pursuant to our bylaws, to be timely, a director nomination by a shareholder must generally be delivered to our Secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding ~~year's~~year’s annual meeting; however, if the annual meeting of shareholders is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after the first anniversary of the preceding ~~year's~~year’s annual meeting, a director nomination submitted by a shareholder to be timely must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of (1) the 90th day prior to the annual meeting or (2) the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made. Any recommendation received by our Secretary will be promptly forwarded to the chair of our NC&G Committee for consideration. In order for a shareholder to nominate a director candidate for consideration at our ~~2017~~2023 annual ~~shareholders~~ meeting, we must receive notice of such nomination between February ~~15, 2017~~14, 2023 and March ~~17, 2017~~16, 2023 (inclusive) unless the date of our ~~2017~~2023 annual ~~shareholders~~ meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after June ~~15, 2017.~~14, 2023. Any such nominations must comply with the other requirements for proper nominations pursuant to our bylaws.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our bylaws set out the specific requirements that a shareholder must satisfy in order to properly nominate a director candidate. Any shareholder filing a written notice of nomination for a director must describe various matters regarding the nominee and the shareholder, including, among other things, ~~such information as~~ name; address; occupation; shares, rights to acquire shares and other derivative securities held; and any relevant understandings or arrangements between the shareholder and affiliated parties, if any. A copy of the requirements for nominating a director candidate is available in print to any shareholder who so requests it. Requests for a copy of these requirements should be mailed to our ~~company's~~company’s headquarters at Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, GA 30309, Attention: Investor Relations.

In addition to candidates submitted by shareholders, our NC&G Committee will also consider candidates recommended by directors, management, third party search firms and other credible sources. Candidates recommended by any of these

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

sources will be equally evaluated and considered. Our NC&G Committee will compile a complete list of candidates recommended ~~from~~by any ~~viable~~credible source and evaluate each candidate. Each candidate will be evaluated in the context of the current composition of our Board, the current needs of our Board and the long-term interests of our shareholders. In making its evaluation of possible director candidates, our NC&G Committee will consider, among other things, issues such as a ~~candidate's~~candidate’s independence, expertise, age, diversity, general business knowledge and experience, financial literacy, availability and commitment. After evaluating each candidate, our NC&G Committee will determine which candidates it will recommend to the full Board.

To comply with the universal proxy rules (once effective), shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 no later than April 15, 2023.

Shareholder Proposals

Pursuant to our bylaws, in order for a shareholder proposal (other than a proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or director nomination) to be considered at an annual meeting, the proposal must be delivered to our Secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding ~~year's~~year’s annual meeting; however, if the annual meeting of shareholders is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after the first anniversary of the preceding ~~year's~~year’s annual meeting, in order to be timely, a shareholder proposal must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of (1) the 90th day prior to the annual meeting or (2) the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made. Accordingly, in order for a shareholder proposal (other than a director nomination) to be considered at our ~~2017~~2023 annual ~~shareholders~~ meeting, we must receive the proposal between February ~~15, 2017~~14, 2023 and March ~~17, 2017~~16, 2023 (inclusive) unless the date of our ~~2017~~2023 annual ~~shareholders~~ meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after June ~~15, 2017.~~

14, 2023.

Our bylaws set out the specific requirements that a shareholder must satisfy in order to properly make a proposal for consideration by our shareholders at an annual meeting. Any shareholder submitting a proposal must describe various matters regarding the shareholder, including, among other things, ~~such information as~~ name; address; occupation; shares, rights to acquire shares and other derivative securities held; and any relevant understandings or arrangements between the shareholder and affiliated parties, if any. A copy of the requirements for submitting a shareholder proposal is available in print to any shareholder who so requests it. Requests for a copy of these requirements should be mailed to our ~~company's~~company’s headquarters at Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, GA 30309, Attention: Investor Relations.

Our bylaws further contemplate that shareholders who wish to have a proposal included in our proxy statement may be permitted to do so in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, provided the proposal is otherwise in accordance with such Rule 14a-8. In order for a proposal to be included pursuant to Rule 14a-8 in the proxy statement for our ~~2017~~2023 annual meeting, it must be submitted in writing by January ~~6, 2017~~4, 2023 and comply with the requirements of Rule ~~14a-8.~~

14a-8, unless the date of our 2023 annual meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after June 14, 2023.

Communications to our Board of Directors

Mail can be addressed to our directors in care of the Office of the Secretary at our ~~company's~~company’s headquarters at Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. At the direction of our Board, all mail received will be opened and screened for security purposes. The mail will then be logged in. All ~~mail, other than trivial or obscene items,~~relevant communications to our directors will be forwarded. ~~Trivial items will be delivered to our directors at the next scheduled meeting of our Board.~~ Mail addressed to a particular director will be forwarded or delivered to that director. Mail addressed to ~~"Outside~~“Outside Directors,~~" "Non-Management Directors"~~” “Non-Management Directors” or the ~~"Presiding Independent Director"~~“Lead Director” will be forwarded or delivered to our ~~presiding independent~~lead director. Mail addressed to the ~~"Board~~“Board of ~~Directors"~~Directors” will be ~~forwarded or~~ delivered to our Chairman.

~~Table of Contents~~

Proxy Solicitation

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies by our Board in connection with the annual meeting. We will reimburse brokers, fiduciaries and custodians for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock held in their names. Our employees may solicit proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile, electronic mail and personal interview. We have also engaged Okapi Partners to act as our proxy solicitor and have agreed to pay it ~~$6,500~~$7,000 for the year, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, for such services.

Shareholder List

We will maintain a list of shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting at our headquarters located at 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. A list of the shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for examination by any shareholder for a period of 10 days prior to the meeting. Any shareholder wishing to schedule an appointment to examine the shareholder list during this period may do so by sending an e-mail to generalcounsel@oxfordinc.com. The shareholder list will also be available during the annual meeting on the virtual meeting website.


		~~By Order of the Board of Directors~~

		~~Thomas E. Campbell~~ ~~Executive Vice President-Law and Administration,~~ ~~General Counsel and Secretary~~

50 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Website Information

We have posted our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, ethical conduct policy for senior financial officers and Audit Committee and NC&G Committee charters under the “Corporate Governance Library” link under the “Investor Relations” tab on our website at www.oxfordinc.com.

Information contained on our website shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Suraj A. Palakshappa
Senior Vice President, General Counsel,
Treasurer and Secretary

Our ~~Fiscal 2015~~2021 Annual Report ~~to Shareholders,~~on Form 10-K, which includes audited financial statements, is available ~~over~~on the Internet at http://www.edocumentview.com/~~OXM.~~oxford. Any shareholder may request a printed copy of the ~~Fiscal 2015~~2021 Annual Report ~~to Shareholders~~on Form 10-K by following the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDIX A

OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED
LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
(as of March , 2022)

1. Purpose. ~~Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one~~The purpose of the ~~voting methods outlined below~~Oxford Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to attract and retain employees and directors for Oxford Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries and to provide such persons with incentives and rewards for superior performance.

2. Definitions. The following terms shall be defined as set forth below:

(a) “Award” means any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Share, Restricted Share Unit, or Other Stock-Based Award.

(b) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d) “Committee” means a committee of the Board charged with administering the Plan as described in Section 4.

(e) “Company” means Oxford Industries, Inc., a Georgia corporation, or any successor corporation.

(f) “Director” means a member of the Board.

(g) “Employee” means any person, including an officer, employed by the Company or a Subsidiary.

(h) “Fair Market Value” means the fair market value of the Shares as determined by the Committee from time to time in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Unless otherwise specified in the terms of an Award, Fair Market Value shall mean the closing price for the Shares reported on a consolidated basis on the New York Stock Exchange on the last day prior to the date in question or, if there were no sales on such date, the closing price on the nearest preceding date on which sales occurred.

(i) “Grant Date” means the date specified by the Committee on which a grant of an Award shall become effective, which shall not be earlier than the date on which the Committee completes the corporate action with respect thereto.

(j) “Option” means any option to purchase Shares granted under Section 5 of this Plan.

(k) “Optionee” means the person so designated in an agreement evidencing an outstanding Option.

(l) “Other Stock-Based Award” means a right granted under Section 9 of this Plan.

(m) “Participant” means an Employee or nonemployee Director who is selected by the Committee to receive benefits under this Plan, provided that nonemployee Directors shall not be eligible to receive grants of incentive stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Code.

(n) “Performance Objectives” means the performance criteria that may be established pursuant to this Plan for Participants who have received grants of Restricted Shares, Restricted Share Units or Other Stock-Based Awards. Performance Objectives may include, but are not limited to, the achievement of a specified target, or target growth in, one or more of the following: (i) earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”); (ii) earnings before interest expense and taxes (“EBIT”); (iii) net earnings; (iv) net income; (v) operating income; (vi) earnings per share; (vii) book value per share; (viii) return on shareholders’ equity; (ix) capital expenditures; (x) expenses and expense ratio management; (xi) return on investment; (xii) improvements in capital structure; (xiii) profitability of an identifiable business unit or product; (xiv) maintenance or improvement of profit margins; (xv) stock price; (xvi) market share; (xvii) revenues or sales; (xviii) costs; (xix) cash flow; (xx) working capital; (xxi) return on (net) assets; (xxii) economic value added; (xxiii) gross or net profit before or after taxes; (xxiv) objectively determinable goals with respect to service or product delivery, service or product quality, inventory management, customer satisfaction, meeting budgets and/or retention of employees; or (xxv) total shareholder return or relative total shareholder return. Performance Objectives may relate to the Company and/or one or more of its subsidiaries, one or more of its divisions or units or any combination of the foregoing, on a consolidated or nonconsolidated basis, and may be applied on an absolute basis or be relative to one or more peer group companies or indices, or any combination thereof, all as the Committee determines.

(o) “Performance Period” means a period of time established under Sections 7 and 8 of this Plan within which the Performance Objectives relating to a Restricted Share or Restricted Share Unit are to be achieved.

(p) “Restricted Share” means a Share granted under Section 7 of this Plan.

A-1 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(q) “Restricted Share Unit” means a bookkeeping entry that records the equivalent of one Restricted Share awarded pursuant to Section 8 of this Plan.

(r) “Shares” means shares of the Common Stock of the Company, $1.00 par value, or any security into which Shares may be converted by reason of any transaction or event of the type referred to in Section 11 of this Plan.

(s) “Stock Appreciation Right” means a right granted under Section 6 of this Plan.

(t) “Subsidiary” means a corporation or other entity (i) more than 50 percent of whose outstanding shares or securities (representing the right to vote ~~your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted~~for the election of Directors or other managing authority) are, or (ii) which does not have outstanding shares or securities (as may be the case in a partnership, joint venture or unincorporated association), but more than 50 percent of whose ownership interest (representing the right generally to make decisions for such other entity) is, now or hereafter owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the ~~Internet~~Company, provided that for purposes of determining whether any person may be a Participant for purposes of any grant of incentive stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Code, “Subsidiary” means any corporation in which the Company owns or ~~telephone must~~controls directly or indirectly more than 50 percent of the total combined voting power represented by all classes of stock issued by such corporation at the time of such grant.

3. Shares Available Under the Plan.

(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 11 of this Plan, the number of Shares that may be ~~received~~(i) issued or transferred upon the exercise of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, (ii) awarded as Restricted Shares and released from substantial risk of forfeiture, or (iii) issued or transferred in payment of Restricted Share Units or Other Stock-Based Awards shall not in the aggregate exceed 2,500,000 Shares. In no event, however, shall the number of Shares issued upon the exercise of incentive stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Code exceed 200,000 Shares, as adjusted pursuant to Section 11. Such Shares may be Shares of original issuance, Shares held in Treasury, or Shares that have been reacquired by ~~1:00 a.m.~~the Company.

(b) With respect to Awards for which Shares were transferred to Participants upon payment of the Option price upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option by the transfer to the Company of Shares or upon satisfaction of tax withholding obligations under the Plan by the transfer or relinquishment of Shares, there shall be deemed to have been issued or transferred only the number of Shares actually issued or transferred by the Company, less the number of Shares so transferred or relinquished. Upon the payment in cash of a benefit provided by any Award under the Plan, any Shares that were subject to such Award shall again be available for issuance or transfer under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, after March 24, 2015, for any Shares which are (i) subject to an Award that are tendered to, or withheld by, the Company in payment of the exercise price of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, (ii) subject to an Award and are relinquished, forfeited or otherwise tendered to the Company in satisfaction of tax and related withholding obligations, including as contemplated pursuant to Section 13 of this Plan, (iii) subject to a Stock Appreciation Right (to the extent that it is exercised and settled in Shares, without regard to the number of Shares issued to the Participant upon exercise), ~~Central Time,~~or (iv) repurchased by the Company with the proceeds from the exercise of an Option, all such Shares shall be deemed to have been issued for purposes of the limitations set forth in the first sentence of Section 3(a) of this Plan.

(c) No Participant may receive Awards representing more than 300,000 Shares (as adjusted pursuant to Section 11) at the time the grant is made in any one calendar year.

4. Administration of the Plan. This Plan shall be administered by one or more committees appointed by the Board. The interpretation and construction by the Committee of any provision of this Plan or of any agreement or document evidencing the grant of any Award and any determination by the Committee pursuant to any provision of this Plan or any such agreement, notification or document, shall be final and conclusive. No member of the Committee shall be liable to any person for any such action taken or determination made in good faith.

5. Options. The Committee may from time to time authorize grants to Participants of Options upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine in accordance with the following provisions:

(a) Each grant shall specify the number of Shares to which it pertains.

(b) Each grant shall specify an Option price per Share, which shall be equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value on the Grant Date.

(c) Each grant shall specify the form of consideration to be paid in satisfaction of the Option price and the manner of payment of such consideration, which may include (i) cash in the form of currency or check or other cash equivalent acceptable to the Company, (ii) nonforfeitable, unrestricted Shares owned by the Optionee which have a value at the time of exercise that is equal to the Option price, (iii) any other legal consideration that the Committee may deem appropriate on such basis as the Committee may determine in accordance with this Plan, or (iv) any combination of the foregoing.

(d) [Intentionally Deleted.]

2022 PROXY STATEMENT A-2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(e) Each Option grant may specify a period of continuous employment of the Optionee by the Company or any Subsidiary (or, in the case of a nonemployee Director, service on the Board) that is necessary before the Options or installments thereof shall become exercisable, and any grant may provide for the earlier exercise of such rights in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement. Without limitation of the foregoing but subject to the Committee’s discretion to include a provision permitting earlier exercise in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement, no Option grant to an Employee on or after March 24, 2015 shall permit such Employee to exercise any portion of the Option prior to the one year anniversary of the Grant Date of the Option.

(f) Options granted under this Plan may be incentive stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Code, nonqualified stock options (i.e., any option that is not designated as intended to qualify as an incentive stock option), or a combination of the foregoing, provided that only nonqualified stock options may be granted to nonemployee Directors. Each grant shall specify whether (or the extent to which) the Option is an incentive stock option or a nonqualified stock option. Notwithstanding any such designation, to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares with respect to which Options designated as incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by an Optionee during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company) exceeds $100,000, such Options shall be treated as nonqualified stock options. No Option granted under this Plan may be exercised more than ten years from the Grant Date.

(g) Each grant shall be evidenced by an agreement or other form of notice of the Award delivered to the Optionee and containing such terms and provisions as the Committee may determine consistent with this Plan.

6. Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may from time to time authorize grants to Participants of Stock Appreciation Rights. A Stock Appreciation Right is the right of the Participant to receive from the Company an amount, which shall be determined by the Committee and shall be expressed as a percentage (not exceeding 100 percent) of the difference between the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the Grant Date and the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of exercise. Any grant of Stock Appreciation Rights under this Plan shall be upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine in accordance with the following provisions:

(a) Any grant may specify that the amount payable upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right may be paid by the Company in cash, Shares or any combination thereof and may (i) either grant to the Participant or reserve to the Committee the right to elect among those alternatives or (ii) preclude the right of the Participant to receive and the Company to issue Shares or other equity securities in lieu of cash.

(b) Any grant may specify that the amount payable upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right shall not exceed a maximum specified by the Committee on the Grant Date.

(c) Each grant shall be evidenced by an agreement or other form of notice of the Award delivered to the Participant, which shall describe the subject Stock Appreciation Rights, state that the Stock Appreciation Rights are subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Plan and contain such other terms and provisions as the Committee may determine consistent with this Plan.

(d) Each grant shall specify in respect of each Stock Appreciation Right the Fair Market Value on the Grant

Date.

(e) Successive grants may be made to the same Participant regardless of whether any Stock Appreciation Rights previously granted to such Participant remain unexercised.

(f) Each grant shall specify the period or periods of continuous employment (or, in the case of a nonemployee Director, service on the Board) of the Participant by the Company or any Subsidiary that are necessary before the Stock Appreciation Rights or installments thereof shall become exercisable, as well as the permissible dates or periods on or during which Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable. Any grant may provide for the earlier exercise of such rights in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement. Without limitation of the foregoing but subject to the Committee’s discretion to include a provision permitting earlier exercise in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement, no Stock Appreciation Right granted to an Employee on or after March 24, 2015 shall permit such Employee to exercise any portion of the Stock Appreciation Right prior to the one year anniversary of the Grant Date of the Stock Appreciation Right.

7. Restricted Shares. The Committee may from time to time authorize grants to Participants of one or more Restricted Shares upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine in accordance with the following provisions:

(a) Each grant shall constitute a transfer of the ownership of Shares to the Participant in consideration of the performance of services.

A-3 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(b) Each grant may be made without additional consideration from the Participant or in consideration of a payment by the Participant that is less than the Fair Market Value on the Grant Date.

(c) Each grant may provide that the Restricted Shares covered thereby shall be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code for a period to be determined by the Committee on the Grant Date, and any grant or sale may provide for the earlier termination of such risk of forfeiture in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement. Without limitation of the foregoing but subject to the Committee’s discretion to include a provision permitting earlier exercise in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement, Restricted Shares granted to an Employee on or after March 24, 2015 shall be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture for at least one year following the applicable Grant Date except for any performance awards to an Employee which is settled in Restricted Shares, for which the foregoing one year period shall be inclusive of any performance period with respect to such award combined with any period of a substantial risk of forfeiture.

(d) Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, an award of Restricted Shares shall entitle the Participant to dividend, voting and other ownership rights, during the period for which such substantial risk of forfeiture is to continue.

(e) Each grant shall provide that, during the period for which a substantial risk of forfeiture is to continue, the transferability of the Restricted Shares shall be prohibited or restricted in the manner and to the extent prescribed by the Committee on the Grant Date. Such restrictions may include, without limitation, rights of repurchase or first refusal in the Company or provisions subjecting the Restricted Shares to a continuing substantial risk of forfeiture in the hands of any transferee.

(f) Any grant or the vesting thereof may be conditioned upon or further conditioned upon the attainment of Performance Objectives during a Performance Period as established by the Committee.

(g) Any grant may require that any or all dividends or other distributions paid on the Restricted Shares during the period of such restrictions be automatically sequestered and reinvested on an immediate or deferred basis in additional Shares, which may be subject to the same restrictions as the underlying Award or such other restrictions as the Committee may determine.

(h) Each grant shall be evidenced by an agreement or other form of notice of the Award delivered to the Participant and containing such terms and provisions as the Committee may determine consistent with this Plan. Unless otherwise directed by the Committee, all certificates representing Restricted Shares, together with a stock power that shall be endorsed in blank by the Participant with respect to such Shares, shall be held in custody by the Company until all restrictions thereon lapse.

8. Restricted Share Units. The Committee may from time to time authorize grants of Restricted Share Units upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine in accordance with the following provisions:

(a) Each grant shall specify the number of Restricted Share Units to which it pertains, which may be subject to adjustment to reflect changes in compensation or other factors.

(b) The Performance Period with respect to each Restricted Share Unit, if any, may be subject to earlier termination in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement.

(c) Each grant may specify in respect of the specified Performance Objectives a minimum acceptable level of achievement below which no payment will be made and may set forth a formula for determining the amount of any payment to be made if performance is at or above such minimum acceptable level but falls short of the maximum achievement of the specified Performance Objectives.

(d) Each grant shall specify the time and manner of payment of Restricted Share Units that shall have been earned, and any grant may specify that any such amount may be paid by the Company in cash, Shares or any combination thereof and may either grant to the Participant or reserve to the Committee the right to elect among those alternatives. Without limitation of the foregoing but subject to the Committee’s discretion to include a provision permitting earlier settlement in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement, Restricted Share Units granted to an Employee on or after March 24, 2015 shall not be settled for a period of at least one year following the applicable Grant Date except for any performance award to an Employee which is settled in Restricted Share Units, for which the foregoing one year period shall be inclusive of any performance period with respect to such award combined with any additional period prior to settlement.

(e) Any grant of Restricted Share Units may specify that the amount payable, or the number of Shares issued, with respect thereto may not exceed maximums specified by the Committee on the Grant Date.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT A-4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(f) Any grant of Restricted Share Units may provide for the payment to the Participant of dividend equivalents thereon in cash or additional Shares on a current, deferred or contingent basis.

(g) If provided in the terms of the grant, the Committee may adjust Performance Objectives and the related minimum acceptable level of achievement if, in the sole judgment of the Committee, events or transactions have occurred after the Grant Date that are unrelated to the performance of the Participant and result in distortion of the Performance Objectives or the related minimum acceptable level of achievement.

(h) Each grant shall be evidenced by an agreement or other form of notice of the Award delivered to the Participant, which shall state that the Restricted Share Units are subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Plan and such other terms and provisions as the Committee may determine consistent with this Plan.

9. Other Stock-Based Awards. The Committee may from time to time authorize grants of Shares and other Awards that are payable in cash or Shares and are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based in whole or in part on Shares or the value of Shares upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine in accordance with the following provisions:

(a) Each grant shall specify the number of Shares to which it pertains, which may be subject to adjustment to reflect changes in compensation or other factors.

(b) The Performance Period with respect to each Other Stock-Based Award, if any, may be subject to earlier termination in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement.

(d) Each grant shall specify the time and manner of payment of Other Stock-Based Awards that shall have been earned, and any grant may specify that any such amount may be paid by the Company in cash, Shares or any combination thereof and may either grant to the Participant or reserve to the Committee the right to elect among those alternatives. Without limitation of the foregoing but subject to the Committee’s discretion to include a provision permitting earlier exercise in the event of a change in control of the Company or other similar transaction or event or the Participant’s termination of employment due to death, disability, or normal or early retirement, Other Stock-Based Awards shall not be settled for a period of at least one year following the applicable Grant Date except for any performance award to an Employee which is settled in Other Stock-Based Awards, for which the foregoing one year period shall be inclusive of any performance period with respect to such award combined with any additional period prior to settlement.

(e) Any grant of an Other Stock-Based Award may specify that the amount payable, or the number of Shares issued, with respect thereto may not exceed maximums specified by the Committee on the Grant Date.

(f) Any grant of an Other Stock-Based Award may provide for the payment to the Participant of dividend equivalents thereon in cash or additional Shares on a current, deferred or contingent basis.

(h) Each grant shall be evidenced by an agreement or other form of notice of the Award delivered to the Participant, which shall state that the Other Stock-Based Award is subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Plan and such other terms and provisions as the Committee may determine consistent with this Plan.

10. Transferability.

(a) Except as provided in Section 10(b), no Award granted under this Plan shall be transferable by a Participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable during a Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant or, in the event of the Participant’s legal incapacity, by his guardian or legal representative acting in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of the Participant under state law. Any attempt to transfer an Award in violation of this Plan shall render such Award null and void.

(b) The Committee may expressly provide in an Award agreement (or an amendment to an Award agreement) that a Participant may transfer such Award (other than an incentive stock option as defined in Section 422 of the Code), in whole or in part, to a spouse or lineal descendant (a “Family Member”), a trust for the exclusive benefit of Family Members, a partnership or other entity in which all the beneficial owners are Family Members, or any other entity affiliated with the Participant that may be approved by the Committee. Subsequent transfers of Awards shall be

A-5 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

prohibited except in accordance with this Section 10(b). All terms and conditions of the Award, including provisions relating to the termination of the Participant’s employment or service with the Company or a Subsidiary, shall continue to apply following a transfer made in accordance with this Section 10(b).

(c) Any Award made under this Plan may provide that all or any part of the Shares that are (i) to be issued or transferred by the Company upon the exercise of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or upon payment under any grant of Restricted Share Units, or (ii) no longer subject to the substantial risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer referred to in Section 7 of this Plan, shall be subject to further restrictions upon transfer.

11. Adjustments. The Committee shall make or provide for such adjustments in the (a) number of Shares covered by outstanding Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units granted hereunder, (b) prices per share applicable to such Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, and (c) kind of Shares covered thereby, as the Committee in its sole discretion may in good faith determine to be equitably required in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants that otherwise would result from (x) any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization or other change in the capital structure of the Company, (y) any merger, consolidation, spin-off, spin-out, split-off, split-up, reorganization, or partial or complete liquidation or other distribution of assets (other than a normal cash dividend), or (z) any other event which would constitute an equity restructuring (as contemplated pursuant to the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder). Without limiting the foregoing, the Committee may make or provide for such adjustments in the (a) number of Shares covered by outstanding Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units granted hereunder, (b) prices per share applicable to such Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, and (c) kind of Shares covered thereby, as the Committee in its sole discretion may in good faith determine to be equitably required in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants that otherwise would result from (x) any combination or exchange of Shares, (y) any issuance of rights or warrants to purchase securities or (z) any other corporate transaction or event having an effect similar to any of the foregoing. Moreover, in the event of any such transaction or event, the Committee may provide in substitution for any or all outstanding Awards under this Plan such alternative consideration as it may in good faith determine to be equitable under the circumstances and may require in connection therewith the surrender of all Awards so replaced. The Committee may also make or provide for such adjustments in the number of Shares specified in Section 3 of this Plan as the Committee in its sole discretion may in good faith determine to be appropriate in order to reflect any transaction or event described in this Section 11. Any actions taken under this Section 11 shall be made in accordance with any applicable provisions of Section 409A of the Code, including without limitation restrictions with regard to the adjustment of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights that are considered exempt from Section 409A of the Code.

12. Fractional Shares. The Company shall not issue any fractional Shares pursuant to this Plan and shall settle any such fractional Shares in cash.

13. Withholding Taxes. To the extent that the Company is required to withhold federal, state, local or foreign taxes in connection with any payment made or benefit realized by a Participant or other person under this Plan, it shall be a condition to the receipt of such payment or the realization of such benefit that the Participant or such other person make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for payment of all such taxes required to be withheld. At the discretion of the Committee, such arrangements may include relinquishment of a portion of such benefit.

14. Certain Terminations of Employment, Hardship and Approved Leaves of Absence. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, in the event of termination of employment by reason of death, disability, normal retirement, early retirement with the consent of the Company or leave of absence approved by the Company, or in the event of hardship or other special circumstances, of a Participant who holds an Option or Stock Appreciation Right that is not immediately and fully exercisable, any Restricted Shares as to which the substantial risk of forfeiture or the prohibition or restriction on transfer has not lapsed, any Restricted Share Units that have not been fully earned, or any Shares that are subject to any transfer restriction pursuant to Section 10(c) of this Plan, the Committee may in its sole discretion take any action that it deems to be equitable under the circumstances or in the best interests of the Company, including, without limitation, waiving or modifying any limitation or requirement with respect to any Award under this Plan.

15. Foreign Employees. In order to facilitate the making of any grant or combination of grants under this Plan, the Committee may provide for such special terms for Awards to Participants who are foreign nationals, or who are employed by the Company or any Subsidiary outside of the United States of America, as the Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy or custom. Moreover, the Committee may approve such supplements to, or amendments, restatements or alternative versions of, this Plan as it may consider necessary or appropriate for such purposes without thereby affecting the terms of this Plan as in effect for any other purpose, provided that no such supplements, amendments, restatements or alternative versions shall include any provisions that are inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as then in effect, unless this Plan could have been amended to eliminate such inconsistency without further approval by the stockholders of the Company.

16. Amendments and Other Matters.

(a) This Plan may be amended from time to time by the Board, but no such amendment shall increase any of the limitations specified in Section 3 of this Plan, other than to reflect an adjustment made in accordance with Section 11, without the further approval of the stockholders of the Company.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT A-6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(b) The Committee shall not re-price any Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted under the Plan or purchase, cancel or buy out an underwater Option or Stock Appreciation Right, except with the approval of the affirmative vote of the majority of Shares voting at a meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

(c) This Plan shall not confer upon any Participant any right with respect to continuance of employment or other service with the Company or any Subsidiary and shall not interfere in any way with any right that the Company or any Subsidiary would otherwise have to terminate any Participant’s employment or other service at any time.

(d) To the extent that any provision of this Plan would prevent any Option that was intended to qualify under particular provisions of the Code from so qualifying, such provision of this Plan shall be null and void with respect to such Option, provided that such provision shall remain in effect with respect to other Options, and there shall be no further effect on any provision of this Plan.

17. Effective Date and Stockholder Approval. This Plan (a) was originally approved by the Board on July 27, 2004 and became effective upon its approval by the stockholders of the Company on October 4, 2004; (b) was subsequently amended by the Board on August 3, 2006 and, giving effect to the amendment referenced in clause (c) below, was approved by the stockholders of the Company on October 10, 2006; (c) was amended by the Board on September 26, 2006; (d) was thereafter amended by the Board on March 26, 2009, and subsequently approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 15, ~~2016. Vote~~2009; (3) was thereafter amended by ~~Internet • Go~~the Board on March 27, 2014, and subsequently approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 18, 2014; and (4) was thereafter amended by the Board on March 24, 2015. This Plan as herein amended and restated shall become effective upon its approval by the stockholders of the Company on , 2022.

18. Governing Law. The validity, construction and effect of this Plan and any Award hereunder will be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia.

19. Section 409A of the Code. Except as otherwise may be provided in an agreement evidencing a grant, all Awards under the Plan are intended to be exempt under Section 409A of the Code. It is the intent of the Company that the operation and administration of the Plan and all agreements evidencing Awards under the Plan not cause the acceleration of taxation, or the imposition of penalty taxes or interest, under Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Award agreement to the contrary, if a Participant is a “specified employee” as such term is used in Section 409A of the Code, then any payment to the Participant described in the Plan or an Award agreement upon his or her termination of employment that is not exempt from Section 409A of the Code, and that constitutes “deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Code that is payable on account of “separation from service” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code), and that is otherwise payable within 6 months after Participant’s separation from service, shall instead be made on the date 6 months after such separation from service.

A-7 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223445d1-px_oxford4c.jpg]

Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card.onlineGo to www.envisionreports.com/~~OXM • Or scan~~Oxford orscan the QR code ~~with your smartphone • Follow~~— login details arelocated in the ~~steps outlined on the secure website Vote by telephone • Call~~shaded bar below.Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery atwww.envisionreports.com/OxfordPhoneCall toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) ~~within the~~withinthe USA, US territories &and Canada ~~on a touch tone telephone • Follow~~Y2022 Annual Meeting Proxy Card2. Approve the ~~instructions provided by~~Oxford Industries, Inc. Long-Term Stock IncentivePlan, as amended and restated, to, among other things,authorize 500,000 additional shares of common stock forissuance under the recorded message Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 1. Proposal to elect the four nominees listed below. If a nominee becomes unwilling or unable to serve, the Proxy will be voted for a substitute nominee or will not be voted, as recommended by the Board of Directors. + For Against Abstain For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 01 - Helen Ballard 02 - Thomas C. Gallagher 03 - Virginia A. Hepner 04 - E. Jenner Wood III For Against Abstain ForAgainst Abstain 2. Proposal to approveplan3. Ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as ~~the Company’s~~theCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm forfiscal 20221. Election of Class III directors to be elected for ~~fiscal 2016. 3. Proposal to approve, on an~~a three-year term expiring in 2025:For Against Abstain4. Approve, by a non-binding, advisory ~~(non-binding) basis, a resolution approving~~vote, the compensation ~~of the~~ofthe Company’s named executive ~~officers. The proxies~~officersFor Against Abstain000004MR A SAMPLEDESIGNATION (IF ANY)ADD 1ADD 2ADD 3ADD 4ADD 5ADD 6ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________1234 5678 9012 345MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM5 4 0 8 9 2MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE ANDMR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE ANDMR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE ANDC 1234567890 J N TC123456789MMMMMMMMMMMMM

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223445d1-px_import4c.jpg]

Small steps make an impact.Help the environment by consenting to receive electronicdelivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/OxfordNotice of 2022 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersProxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — June 14, 2022Thomas C. Chubb III, K. Scott Grassmyer and Suraj A. Palakshappa, or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to representand vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholdersof Oxford Industries, Inc. to be held on June 14, 2022 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR the electionof the Board of Directors and FOR items 2, 3 and 4.In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote ~~in their discretion~~ upon ~~all~~ such other ~~matters~~business as may properly come before the ~~annual meeting, as recommended by the Board of Directors. B Non-Voting~~ meeting.(Items Change of Address — Please print new address below. Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below Please date this proxy and sign exactly as your name or names appear. If shares are jointly owned, both owners should sign. If signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If signing as a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If signing as a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. + 1 U P X 02D1GB Annual Meeting voted appear on reverse side)Proxy ~~Card X IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION~~

~~. q~~- Oxford Industries, Inc.q IF ~~YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,~~VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ~~ENVELOPE. q Proxy~~ENVELOPE.qChange of Address — Oxford Industries, Inc. ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 15, 2016 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The executing shareholder(s) appoints THOMAS C. CHUBB III, THOMAS E. CAMPBELL and K. SCOTT GRASSMYER, and eachPlease print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below.C Non-Voting Items++Important notice regarding the Internet availability of ~~them, proxies, with full power~~proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of ~~substitution, for and in the name~~Shareholders.The material is available at: www.envisionreports.com/OxfordThe 2022 Annual Meeting of ~~the executing shareholder(s), to vote all shares of the common stock~~Shareholders of Oxford Industries, Inc. will be held onTuesday, June 14, 2022 at 2:00 P.M. Eastern time, virtually via the internet at www.meetnow.global/MSPW2TH.To access the virtual meeting, you must have the information that is printed in the ~~executing shareholder(s)~~shaded barlocated on the reverse side of this form.Small steps make an impact.Help the environment by consenting to receive electronicdelivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/OxfordNotice of 2022 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersProxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — June 14, 2022Thomas C. Chubb III, K. Scott Grassmyer and Suraj A. Palakshappa, or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to representand vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would ~~be entitled to vote~~possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of ~~Shareholders~~Shareholdersof Oxford Industries, Inc. to be held on ~~Wednesday,~~ June ~~15, 2016, at 3:00 p.m., local time, at The Fifth Floor Conference Center, located at 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309, and~~14, 2022 or at any postponement or adjournment ~~or postponement thereof,~~thereof.Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR the electionof the Board of Directors and FOR items 2, 3 and 4.In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon ~~the matters described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, receipt of which is acknowledged, and upon any~~such other business ~~that~~as may properly come before the ~~meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Said persons are directed~~meeting.(Items to ~~vote as indicated~~be voted appear on ~~the~~ reverse ~~side, and otherwise in their discretion, as recommended by the Board of Directors, upon any other business. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR~~side)Proxy - Oxford Industries, Inc.q IF ~~NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” EACH OF~~VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE ~~DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1, “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, AND~~BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ~~DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. See reverse~~ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.qChange of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below.C Non-Voting Items++Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for ~~voting instructions.~~the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.The material is available at: www.envisionreports.com/Oxford


~~Filed by the Registrant~~ý(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
~~Filed by a Party other than the Registrant~~o
~~Check the appropriate box:~~
o		~~Preliminary Proxy Statement~~
o		~~Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))~~
ý		~~Definitive Proxy Statement~~
o		~~Definitive Additional Materials~~
o		~~Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12~~


~~Oxford Industries, Inc.~~
~~(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)~~

~~(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)~~
~~Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):~~
ý	~~No fee required.~~
o	~~Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.~~
	~~(1)~~	~~Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:~~
	~~(2)~~	~~Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:~~
	~~(3)~~	~~Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):~~
	~~(4)~~	~~Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:~~
	~~(5)~~	~~Total fee paid:~~
o	~~Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.~~
o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	~~(1)~~	~~Amount Previously Paid:~~
	~~(2)~~	~~Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:~~
	~~(3)~~	~~Filing Party:~~
	~~(4)~~	~~Date Filed:~~

Name		Director Since	Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications

Thomas C. Gallagher	68	2013 (previous service 1991 - 2007)	Mr. Gallagher is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Genuine Parts Company, a distributor of automotive replacement parts, industrial replacement parts, office products and electrical/electronic materials. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Genuine Parts Company in 2004 and Chairman of the Board of Genuine Parts Company in 2005. Mr. Gallagher served as President of Genuine Parts Company from 1990 to 2012 and Chief Operating Officer of Genuine Parts Company from 1990 until 2004. Mr. Gallagher has more than 25 years of executive-level responsibilities with a NYSE-traded public company; brings extensive experience serving on the boards of directors of other companies, including having served on the board of directors of Genuine Parts Company for more than 20 years and having previously served on the boards of directors of STI Classic Funds, STI Classic Variable Trust and National Services Industries, Inc.; and is extremely familiar with our company, having previously served on our Board for more than 15 years, including at the outset of our transformation away from our historical domestic private label manufacturing roots. Mr. Gallagher's business acumen, financial expertise and leadership skills are a valuable asset to our Board and Audit Committee.
Virginia A. Hepner	58	Nominee	Ms. Hepner is President and Chief Executive Officer of The Woodruff Arts Center and has held that position since 2012. Prior to joining the Woodruff Arts Center, she served as a consultant to DMI Music and Media Solutions from 2011 until 2012. She is also currently a principal investor in GHL, LLC, a private real estate investment partnership for commercial assets. Ms. Hepner retired from Wachovia Bank in 2005 as an Executive Vice President. Ms. Hepner serves as a director of State Bank and Trust Company, as well as its holding company State Bank Financial Corporation. In recommending Ms. Hepner to serve on our Board of Directors, our NC&G Committee noted Ms. Hepner's more than 25 years of corporate banking and capital markets experience, as well as her oversight of various aspects of The Woodruff Arts Center's operations, that are expected to serve our Board of Directors well.
John R. Holder	61	2009	Mr. Holder is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Holder Properties, Inc., a commercial and residential real estate development, leasing and management company, and has held that position since 1989. Mr. Holder has served as Chief Executive Officer of Holder Properties since 1980. He is a member of the Board of Directors and Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of Genuine Parts Company and also serves on the Board of Directors of SunTrust Bank's Atlanta Region. Mr. Holder's strategic leadership in the growth of Holder Properties, as well as his extensive involvement in the financial and marketing areas of that business, serves our Board well. His service as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Holder Properties, together with various board affiliations which has included civic organizations and membership on the Audit and Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committees of Genuine Parts Company, has given him leadership experience, business acumen and financial literacy beneficial to our Board and Audit Committee.

Name		Director Since	Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications

J. Reese Lanier	73	1974	Mr. Lanier was self-employed in farming and related businesses until his retirement in 2009. Mr. Lanier has been affiliated with our company in various official and unofficial capacities for more than 50 years, including having served as a director for more than 40 years. His father was one of the founders of our company. Mr. Lanier's deep knowledge of our business and industry, coupled with his business acumen as a sole proprietor, serves our Board well.
Dennis M. Love	60	2008	Mr. Love is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Printpack Inc., a manufacturer of flexible and specialty rigid packaging. Mr. Love was elected Chairman of Printpack Inc. in 2013, and has served as Chief Executive Officer of Printpack Inc. since 1987. Mr. Love also served as President of Printpack Inc. from 1987 until 2013. Mr. Love has been a director of AGL Resources, Inc. since 1999, currently serving as a member of its Audit and Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committees. Mr. Love is also a director of the Cleveland Group, Inc. and a member of the SunTrust Advisory Board. Mr. Love has close to 30 years of experience as a chief executive and has extensive service as a director of public companies, including having served on the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee of AGL Resources, Inc. The insight Mr. Love gained through these board affiliations serves our Board and our NC&G Committee well. In addition, Mr. Love's stewardship of Printpack Inc.'s international operations, as well as successful domestic and international acquisitions, allows him to offer key insights into our operations and strategic decision making.
Clarence H. Smith	65	2003	Mr. Smith is Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc., a full-service home furnishings retailer. Mr. Smith was elected Chairman of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. in 2012 and has served as its President and Chief Executive Officer since 2003. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. from 2002 to 2003, Chief Operating Officer of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. from 2000 to 2002, and Senior Vice President, General Manager-Stores of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Smith serves on the Executive Committee of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. Mr. Smith has 20 years of senior management experience at Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc., an Atlanta-based, publicly traded company with over 100 stores in 16 states in the Southern, mid-Atlantic and Midwestern regions of the United States, which affords our Board and NC&G Committee valuable insight into compensation, governance and general business practices at a company with a brand management focus and retail and other direct-to-consumer business activities.

Name		Director Since	Positions Held and Specific Experience and Qualifications

Clyde C. Tuggle	54	2011	Mr. Tuggle is Senior Vice President and Chief Public Affairs and Communications Officer of The Coca-Cola Company. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Tuggle worked in Coca-Cola's Central European Division Office in Vienna where he held a variety of positions, including as Director of Operations Development, Deputy to the Division President and Region Manager for Austria. In 2000, Mr. Tuggle was elected Vice President of The Coca-Cola Company. In 2003, he was elected Senior Vice President of The Coca-Cola Company and appointed Director of Worldwide Public Affairs and Communications. From 2005 until 2008, Mr. Tuggle served as President of Coca-Cola's Russia, Ukraine & Belarus Business Unit. From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Tuggle served as Coca-Cola's Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Productivity. In 2009, Mr. Tuggle was named Coca-Cola's Senior Vice President, Global Public Affairs and Communications. Mr. Tuggle has served on the Board of Directors of Georgia Power Company since 2012. Mr. Tuggle has more than 10 years of executive management experience at a publicly traded company heavily focused on brand management, including oversight of various aspects of Coca-Cola's international operations that serve our Board well. In addition, Mr. Tuggle's experience at Coca-Cola includes oversight of investor relations and public communications issues that provide key insights to our Board and Audit Committee.
E. Jenner Wood III	64	1995	Mr. Wood is Corporate Executive Vice President of SunTrust Banks, Inc. and has held that title since 1994. He also served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlanta Division of SunTrust Bank from 2014 to October 2015. Mr. Wood served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlanta/Georgia Division of SunTrust Bank from 2010 to 2013 and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Georgia/North Florida Division of SunTrust Bank from 2013 through March 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Wood had served as President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SunTrust Bank Central Group from 2002 to 2010. Mr. Wood is a director of The Southern Company and Genuine Parts Company. Mr. Wood serves on the Governance and Nuclear/Operations Committees of The Southern Company and on the Audit and Compensation and Governance Committees of Genuine Parts Company. Mr. Wood previously served as a director of Crawford & Company until his retirement from that position in July 2013. Mr. Wood also previously served as a director of Georgia Power Company until his election to the Board of Directors of that entity's parent company, The Southern Company, in 2012. Mr. Wood's professional career includes more than 20 years in executive management positions with SunTrust Banks, Inc. and its various affiliates. Mr. Wood's insights with respect to financial issues and the financial services industry generally, including as it relates to the retail and business aspects of SunTrust Bank's operations, together with his extensive experience on the boards of directors and committees of various public and private companies, make him a valuable asset to our Board.

Name

Helen Ballard	40,081	54,919	658	95,658
Thomas C. Gallagher	41,331	54,919	658	96,908
George C. Guynn	55,081	54,919	658	110,658
John R. Holder	12,586	84,914	879	98,379
J. Hicks Lanier⁽³⁾	12,500	—	187	12,687
J. Reese Lanier	37,581	54,919	658	93,158
Dennis M. Love	12,586	84,914	879	98,379
Clarence H. Smith	55,081	54,919	658	110,658
Clyde C. Tuggle	40,081	54,919	658	95,658
E. Jenner Wood III	42,581	54,919	658	98,158